Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi With the Section 21 Notice I do hope the Landlord issued you with: Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the Property How to Rent Guide A current Gas Safety Certificate (if gas in the Property) If above have not been provided to the Tenant by the Landlord then they can't use a Section 21 Notice until the above have been provided (note you don't warn the Landlord of this until but put it in your defence) Have a good read of this link: Evicting tenants in England: Section 21 and Section 8 notices - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Information for landlords in England on tenant eviction: assured shorthold tenancies, including eviction notices, Section 21, Section 8, accelerated possession, possession orders, bailiffs  
    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
    • Hello All,  I’m hoping someone can help me urgently here. Firstly, I’d like to say I have read multiple other threads and have some what an idea of what I should be doing, however my case might be slightly different so coming with my own questions here.    my situation is I lived in Dubai and had a credit card and a loan, loan with HSBC and credit card with Emirates (or the other way round), I lost my job and was forced to leave the country as I was staying in the country on my companies visa.    since coming back, after a few years 2 different debt collections agencies have been approaching me (one being IDRW and the other J&P). I’ve never answered IDRWW and they constantly chase me by calling and messaging me and my employer. My current company is ok with this as I explained the situation but I’m soon to be joining a new company who definitely won’t be ok with being messaged and called. I’m afraid to continue to ignore them as they may message and calm the new employer as they have before and I’ll lose my job. However, it seems clear from these forums that dealing with the debt collection agencies is never a good idea. You shouldn’t agree to the amount or pay anything.    j&p caught me on my phone but I still haven't sent them any money or confirmed the amount they’re saying is owed, they keep pushing to pay off the “principal” amount by making monthly payments, from reading these forums it seems like if I make one of those payments (they have provided bank details for ENBD), then it’ll just be paying off interest and not actually clearing the principle debt and the bank won’t even approve receipt of payment or that it’s coming off principle.    this is my predicament as ignoring them might not be an option if they chase my new employer. Maybe there’s a way to ensure the debt collection agency don’t contact my new employer?? I don’t know? Massively appreciate peoples help here. Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Putting the record straight


Guest perky88
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6027 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This thread was linked to on pepipoo hence all the trolls joining just to disrupt the forum and attack its members.

 

 

So pepipoo members are trolls are they? I actually believe they offer some sound advice on that board, I have also read some very sound advice on this board, equally, there has been some poor advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 233
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm sorry but that is just not the case. On pepipoo hundreds, if not thousands of people, have been helped to defend themselves against unjust parking tickets, whether council or PPC issued. The level of analysis is outstanding IMHO. If however you have no grounds to challenge nobody will waste your time or money doing so.

 

This place on the other hand, although I have only been around for a day, appears to be populated with people who like to argue the toss but provide no real help, as well as representatives of the private parking companies and their associates who lurk around and try to put people off challenging tickets. When that happens on pepipoo they are quickly seen off so that those looking for help will receive it.

 

I thought this was a consumer rights forum but it appears I was misled, sadly. One good aspect of this is that I am sure some pepipooers will stick around here to balance up the debate and that can only be a oggd thing.

 

IM WITH YOU LEGALADVISER.im going know where till i let everyone know

Link to post
Share on other sites

What question?

 

How can a signage that is not seen, or even seen create an acceptance, while Felthouse v. Bindley clearly states that any acceptance must be clearly communicated. What legal authority overruled Felthouse v. Bindley? Or, if not, why does it not apply to PPCs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but that is just not the case. On pepipoo hundreds, if not thousands of people, have been helped to defend themselves against unjust parking tickets, whether council or PPC issued. The level of analysis is outstanding IMHO. If however you have no grounds to challenge nobody will waste your time or money doing so.

 

This place on the other hand, although I have only been around for a day, appears to be populated with people who like to argue the toss but provide no real help, as well as representatives of the private parking companies and their associates who lurk around and try to put people off challenging tickets. When that happens on pepipoo they are quickly seen off so that those looking for help will receive it.

 

I thought this was a consumer rights forum but it appears I was misled, sadly. One good aspect of this is that I am sure some pepipooers will stick around here to balance up the debate and that can only be a good thing.

 

Hear hear!

Link to post
Share on other sites

How can a signage that is not seen, or even seen create an acceptance, while Felthouse v. Bindley clearly states that any acceptance must be clearly communicated. What legal authority overruled Felthouse v. Bindley? Or, if not, why does it not apply to PPCs?

 

 

I have not got a clue what you are on about or care for that matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but that is just not the case. On pepipoo hundreds, if not thousands of people, have been helped to defend themselves against unjust parking tickets, whether council or PPC issued. The level of analysis is outstanding IMHO. If however you have no grounds to challenge nobody will waste your time or money doing so.

 

This place on the other hand, although I have only been around for a day, appears to be populated with people who like to argue the toss but provide no real help, as well as representatives of the private parking companies and their associates who lurk around and try to put people off challenging tickets. When that happens on pepipoo they are quickly seen off so that those looking for help will receive it.

 

I thought this was a consumer rights forum but it appears I was misled, sadly. One good aspect of this is that I am sure some pepipooers will stick around here to balance up the debate and that can only be a good thing.

 

Hear hear!

Link to post
Share on other sites

oops he stumped.should have checked out pepipoo.or sorry we are all trolls.what a laugh.who needs help now then?

 

If you are going to try and insult me at least try and get a grasp of the English language and punctuation!

I don't care because I never said there was a contract. I don't even drive a car so there is little point in me losing sleep over it is there?

You have added nothing constructive to this debate other than call someone a fat pig and make an untrue statement that parking fines are covered by criminal law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

excuse me but fpn.s parking fines are covered by law.ie mag courts.invoices are not.you cant take me to mag court over an invioce now can you.or am i stupid.please correct me if im wrong.and if you dont drive then why are you looking at this thread? PPC.I THINK

Link to post
Share on other sites

excuse me but fpn.s parking fines are covered by law.ie mag courts.invoices are not.you cant take me to mag court over an invioce now can you.or am i stupid.please correct me if im wrong.and if you dont drive then why are you looking at this thread? PPC.I THINK

 

well you think wrong.i didnt say i didnt drive or cant you read as well as write?no you cant take an invoice to magistrate court so that kind of ruins your theory about being guilty or cant you remember your own stupid remarks?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kindly substitute the word "Guilty" for "liable" and "innocent" for "otherwise"

then we can all go back to being mates.

 

Parking fines are covered by criminal law when issued by a police officer, a traffic warden or a PCSO, referring to a Penalty charge under contract as a fine is also covered by criminal law. btw

All posts by myself are without prejudice and do not constitue legal advice, they are purely for the discussion of points of law and consumer rights.

I am however not affiliated in any way shape or form with any financial institution or parking company. And if i am elected I will make it mandatory that all persons posting on this forum make such a declaration just so we can all see who the trolls are :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kindly substitute the word "Guilty" for "liable" and "innocent" for "otherwise"

then we can all go back to being mates.

 

Parking fines are covered by criminal law when issued by a police officer, a traffic warden or a PCSO, referring to a Penalty charge under contract as a fine is also covered by criminal law. btw

 

thanks for putting me right.cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6027 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...