Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Northern Rock loan and Link Financial


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6049 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

Just a quicky as i am new to this.

 

I held an account with Northern Rock for a loan i took out 3 years ago.

 

The original amount was £18k, after about 2 years i got into trouble after losing my job and defaulted on the loan.

 

I approached a debt management company (Baines & Earnst) big mistake i know, Northern Rock were stubborn with the offers put forward and eventually took me to court to get a CCJ registered.

 

They then took me to court to have a charging order placed on my property, which they succeeded in doing.

 

Now it seems they have sold the debt (which now stands at £33k, the total amount i would have paid back) to Link Financial.

 

Am i right in understanding that when they bought this debt, they also bought the CCJ and the Charging Order?

 

I am currently going down the channels of requesting a signed agreement from them, and the CCA etc etc.

 

Any help/info/advice would be gratefully received.

 

Thanks

 

Dave M:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps a Mod could move this to Debt collectors to attain a better response

 

 

 

Thanks

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Davy what was agreed at the time of the original CCJ being granted I asssume you didnt Defend? wWhat did you agree by way of payments?

Need more info from the outstart to advise

 

 

Regards

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, what happened was when i got a court summons regarding northern rock i had to get it changed to my home town court which i did.

 

I did try to defend myself as i had asked northern rock for help but they had shunned me and were adamant on getting the judgement.

 

In court the judgement was passed as the judge didn't believe that with my other creditors and my current (then) income i could maintain the contracted payments so he passed th CCJ and the charging order.

 

In court no payment arrangement was met, it was merely to get the charging order passed. I made an offer to the solicitor acting on behalf on Northern Rock but when he phoned them they refused.

 

So, in court on the day all that happened was they got the CCJ and the charging order, as far as i know that was it. Their solicitor said they would send a letter in due course.

 

All i got was a letter from the land and property register saying a charge had been placed on my home.

 

Then i got a letter from Link Financial saying they were now in control of the debt. So i am a bit stuck because if they have bought the debt, have they also bought the CCJ and Charging Order?

 

Can these things be transferred between 3rd parties freely?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Now it seems they have sold the debt (which now stands at £33k, the total amount i would have paid back) to Link Financial."

 

What exactley have you recieved to confirm this?

Have you recieved any N.O.A Notice of assignment from N.R?

 

Has far as I was aware once Judment has been attatined Tranfer was unlawful but will clarify shortly,

You say you have CCA Link ? What about penalty charges from N.R?

You may have grounds to have the Judgements set aside,

 

Regards

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well when i received the letter from Link i automatically phoned them up to clarify what and who they were.

 

I am quite good on the phone and the guy i spoke to told me they had bought the debt from Northern Rock and were in control of it, as well as the Charging Order and only they have the power to remove it once the debt is satisfied.

 

I haven't had any letters/correspondence/phone calls from Northern Rock since the early part of this year and that was before the court case.

 

Out of curiosity i phoned Northern Rock as if i was still a customer and enquired as to the balance of my loan, but it was weird as the chap i spoke to said there was two accounts, one had a balance of £3k and the other he didn't know, it was weird, then he gave me another number to call as they would have more details (it was a different department)

 

All in all i thought that when NR sold the account i would be wiped from their database, don't think this has happened.

 

So, i don't know what to do. I have requested a copy of the signed agreement from Link (who have said it takes a while) and am just stalling them at the moment.

 

I haven't CCA (what that mean?) Is it Consumer Credit Act?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly

You have to establish that

1. Link have the legal right to do what ever they intend to do with the account Have they Requested payment?

 

2 .The account has been tranfered to Link lawfully i.e N.O.A

 

3.You have asked Link for the Signed agreement that is what I said ie CCA

 

Would be wise to request Full S.A.R (subject access request) from N.R see what info they hold on you Enclose £10.00 P.O dont sign the request.

Just backtrack abit Davy Did you make payments to the loan A/C from a C/A with N.R?

 

 

Regards

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once Judjement has been set you would have had to propose your inteneded offer of payment. They cant get a CCJ and Charging order in one go you would of had to default on the CCJ for them to proceed

 

To be honest its a bit like "Closing the stable door after the horse has bolted" Link cant continue to chase the debt because said Charging order has been granted

 

Post the following letter to Link and dont ring them again everything in writing now

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

I DO NOT AKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (Link).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully (Dont Sign)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Northern Rock loan and Link Financial
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...