Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Anybody Fancy Some Fun ?


surreyscouse
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5932 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Morning SS... Was beginning to wonder where this mornings update had got to !

If you have found this post (or any other post) useful ensure you click on the scales in the top right of that post to give credit where credit is due.:D

 

DO YOU HAVE A WEBSITE AND WANT TO PROVIDE A VALUABLE LINK TO THIS FORUM ? Go to this thread:-http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?p=52854

 

As ever, with (I believe most if not) all advice given on this website, I am not qualified to give any advice and you are duly warned that any decisions are your own decisions made on your own account and no liability will be accepted for any advice followed ! Use your own judgment.

Seek advice of a qualified, insured, professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 371
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

And you let her go out and miss the delivery ???

 

eusa_snooty.gif

If you have found this post (or any other post) useful ensure you click on the scales in the top right of that post to give credit where credit is due.:D

 

DO YOU HAVE A WEBSITE AND WANT TO PROVIDE A VALUABLE LINK TO THIS FORUM ? Go to this thread:-http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?p=52854

 

As ever, with (I believe most if not) all advice given on this website, I am not qualified to give any advice and you are duly warned that any decisions are your own decisions made on your own account and no liability will be accepted for any advice followed ! Use your own judgment.

Seek advice of a qualified, insured, professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done to you surreyscouse. I hope everything turns out well. I have to admit though you are a lucky as the Garcia in the CL semi at Anfield in getting a response from MBNA. All I’ve had is a hand written postcard (covered in footballs) from someone in Ireland – I can’t make out the signature but they are apparently going to call me this week. Generally their responses to me are “the greatest work of fiction since laws of fidelity were included in the French marriage service…”

 

Keep us all posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had the DPA stuff. Sent the LBA. Had some letters from “Head ofs” some threatening me with collection agencies, default notices etc which I responded to indicating my intentions to litigate. Could n’t afford to go to court at that time as I did n’t have the fees at that time of the month so held off. Going to file my claim next Tuesday. Why they sent me a postcard Christ knows! It has a phone number on it so I’ll ring it when I get home. I’ve written to them at

 

MBNA Europe Bank Ltd

PO Box 1004

Chester Business Park

Wrexham Road

Chester

CH4 9WW

 

Anyway today I’ve just sent copies of all my letters to

 

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

 

with a read receipt

 

Oh ……………and my “friends” on the redandwhitekop forum sent me the following message.

 

“An Error Has Occurred! Sorry Guest, you are banned from using this forum! Gayboy “

 

I'm gutted!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Timing a bit out of sinc here but thank you. I will keep you updated.

 

You have my express permision to continue stalking me.

 

I left a message on Michael Rhodes Voicemail last night for Stuart Johnson to call me to see what action he is going to take with regards to the DPA breaches. I read through all the info they sent to me, about 50 pages and not in date order so took me ages to get that sorted. Loads of mistakes, still oads of info missing and curiously no mention at all of any of my conversations/emails with the advocates office. even when I threaten them with court action they can't get it bloody right !

 

Will update later when Stuart Johnson calls !

 

Hello! Sorry, been off forum for a day due to going out and drinking too much, oh and having my purse nicked on train! Perfect!:sad:

 

Thanks for permission to continue stalking - what a relief! Saves me having to find somebody else!;)

 

Can't wait to hear what SJ says!

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning Dinghy ! Hope you are well mate.

 

Dunno how I ended up with a stalker, I suppose it's my charismatic scouse charm !

 

It was................;):D

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You know what, I'd phone mbna Michael Rhodes 01244 672040 and ask them why they aren't taking you seriously. I mean, you are threatening court action and they send you a bloddy postcard !!!!! If it was me, I would go mental at them !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Email response from Stuart Johnson:

 

Dear surreyscouse

 

I'm afraid I don't have personal voicemail, so I was unaware of any message. Given the previous mis-understandings over your requirements when discussed over the phone, I think it is prudent that we stick to written communications. There is a response to your previous email going out to you today.

 

Kind regards,

 

Stuart

 

 

I have left numerous messages for Stuart/Gavin for them to email their letter. Gavin has left for the day and the last he left for me is that they are not entering any verbal or email communication. that is not what they are stating above.

 

I have just spoken to Michael Rhodes P.A. who said that i will just have to wait to get the letter. Not having that was put through to Stuart Johnson. He was in a pretty bad modd let me tell you. He will not email or fax the letter to me. Would not give a reason and said he was very busy and was terminating the call. He hung up. I was not agressive, abusive or confrontational. I am now going to email Michael Rhodes to request he emails it to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

email to michale rhodes

 

Dear Mr Rhodes,

I have been in recent communication with Gavin Theobald and Stuart Johnson. Both of whom have always been professional and courteus towards me.

I am fully aware that a prompt response has been issued to my email dated 23rd May 2006. Stuart informed me that a response was going out last night which was correct. Unfortunately he did not inform me it was being sent by recorded delivery so I did not know I should make arrangements for somebody to be at home to sign for it. At present the letter is sitting in our local post office waiting to be collect which I am unable to do until Wednesday next week.

I have asked on numerous occasions for the letter to be emailed or faxed to me. Most recently about 10 minutes ago when I spoke to Stuart Johnson who was unwilling without reason to forward a copy to me citing his reason as being very busy and terminating our call. He could have easily emailed the letter to me in the time we were speaking.

I see no valid reason why this letter cannot be emailed to me, after all, you have accepted and sent countless emails to me in the past.

Please can you arrange for the letter to be emailed to me before 5pm today so I can consider whatever comments have been made.

Yours sincerely,

surreyscouse

 

 

Nothing will come of it !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems this is starting to get to SJ !!!! eusa_boohoo.gif

 

Keep it up !

 

smiley20.gif

If you have found this post (or any other post) useful ensure you click on the scales in the top right of that post to give credit where credit is due.:D

 

DO YOU HAVE A WEBSITE AND WANT TO PROVIDE A VALUABLE LINK TO THIS FORUM ? Go to this thread:-http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?p=52854

 

As ever, with (I believe most if not) all advice given on this website, I am not qualified to give any advice and you are duly warned that any decisions are your own decisions made on your own account and no liability will be accepted for any advice followed ! Use your own judgment.

Seek advice of a qualified, insured, professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, even another staff member asid to me earlier that they are just really busy at present.

 

Anyway, here is what I think has prompted him to be so short, either:

 

A. He has already given me a massive refund and has had to give me more and is really peeved about the fact that he has given in to me ! and that's why he is being awkward

 

B. He has sent a real agressive letter and just wants me to read it and has really left the ball in my court.

 

C. They really are that busy that he just can't be bothered to take any more letters off me this week and is trying to clear what he already has.

 

Regardless of this, I have never experienced somebody going from being very hospitable to being so very rude and uncompromising in such a short space of time. Oh, and they have definately switched off their read receipt for emails from me ! 8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, and they have definately switched off their read receipt for emails from me ! 8)

 

Switched off their read receipts for you ?

 

Or just not reading your emails ?

If you have found this post (or any other post) useful ensure you click on the scales in the top right of that post to give credit where credit is due.:D

 

DO YOU HAVE A WEBSITE AND WANT TO PROVIDE A VALUABLE LINK TO THIS FORUM ? Go to this thread:-http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?p=52854

 

As ever, with (I believe most if not) all advice given on this website, I am not qualified to give any advice and you are duly warned that any decisions are your own decisions made on your own account and no liability will be accepted for any advice followed ! Use your own judgment.

Seek advice of a qualified, insured, professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Either way mate, I have printed off confirmation they have received them so they can't use the "we mustn't have received it " gag on me ! You may be right, perhaps they are just deleting them. It would be different I bet if my heading was "payment details inside this email" :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Either way mate, I have printed off confirmation they have received them so they can't use the "we mustn't have received it " gag on me ! You may be right, perhaps they are just deleting them. It would be different I bet if my heading was "payment details inside this email" :lol:

 

Thats odd... When I emailed them last week I didn't get a delivery confirmation, just a read receipt... Which (I believe) is quite common with large companies - it stops confirms of good email address if someone scans/spams their network... In fact a lot of large companies also switch off read receipts for the same reason...

If you have found this post (or any other post) useful ensure you click on the scales in the top right of that post to give credit where credit is due.:D

 

DO YOU HAVE A WEBSITE AND WANT TO PROVIDE A VALUABLE LINK TO THIS FORUM ? Go to this thread:-http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?p=52854

 

As ever, with (I believe most if not) all advice given on this website, I am not qualified to give any advice and you are duly warned that any decisions are your own decisions made on your own account and no liability will be accepted for any advice followed ! Use your own judgment.

Seek advice of a qualified, insured, professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I get both a delivery and read receipt, although you are quite correct that a lot of companies switch it off for the very reason you pointed out. Maybe it's not just me and that their server can't cope with sending the messages back out

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got home and I have a couple of standard letters from Matthew Mc Grath - yes you've guessed it he's another "Head of " so I am including him on every email with a delivery AND a read receipt.

 

The letters are pretty standard

 

One starts - "Act Now, Before it's too late. The above account will soon be written off as a bad debt, unless you call to make payment arrangement.............

 

The other (much the same tone)

 

"Only a small amount of our customers set out to deliberately avoid making paymments and when we have eviidence that this is the case, we apply sufficient resources to pursue them..........."

 

 

Any advice before I respond?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Eric,

 

I would drop them an email saying that you have received their postcard. I take it their 14 days after the LBA is up so I would email them and say to them that you are willing to extend your deadline until noon on 30th May for them to comply with your request or you will issue a summons without further notice. See where I'm going, bank holiday Monday so it means that they will need to action your request today. Make it clear that you will not offer a further extension under any circumstances. This will rattle as we now know that they are well and truly on the ropes !

 

What do you think ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5932 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...