Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Account history info required!


gjkendall
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6031 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Bit of a long story this, but I'll try to be brief...

 

My father in law has had a stroke and has sadly been left in a state that means he cannot run his account properly...this has meant that some low life family mambers are starting to take liberties. My mother in law, is somewhat old school in her thinking, and trusts everyone (her husband was the one that controlled the money). My sister in law has somehow put herslef in a position where she now controls the money (she is awful with money and has massive debts). She should not be in control of the card! Since she has been in control, they seem to of had lots of holidays, buying loads of clothes etc etc. She has just gone on another holiday and has apperently left my father in laws card in her locked house (we reckon she has taken the card with her)..leaving my parent in law with a scrap of paper with the card number on.

 

Is there any way that myself or my wife can get the last few years bank statements to try and prove to my mother in law that she and her husband are being fleeced?

 

My mother in law is so trusting she really does believe that she is being paid back for any monies that are taken. (well, the money that she is aware of being taken anyway).

 

There is another family member that claims he paid a large cash amount into the account two years ago, but there is no prove that we are aware of, that he has done this. So another reason we would like to see the statement!

 

Is there anything we can do to try and stop this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does your sister in law (or anyone else for that matter) have power of attorney over your father in laws affairs? If your mother in law has power of attorney she can send a SAR to get statements for the history of the account.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does your sister in law (or anyone else for that matter) have power of attorney over your father in laws affairs? If your mother in law has power of attorney she can send a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to get statements for the history of the account.

 

No one has Power of Attorney...does that mean we have fallen at the first fence?

 

Looks like I am going to have a wade in without any hard proof!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't state how badly your FiL has been affected, but he is clearly in need of a Guardian to look after his affairs, and that person will be able to obtain these statements as formal paperwork is completed.

 

If you want to pre-empt this, you could advise the bank that you believe your FiL card is being misused and that family members may be responsible. This will allow them to cancel the card and block other debits until security is re-established.

 

If you have a family solicitor go to them for advice, or take a look here:

 

Home - Office of the Public Guardian

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes he clearly does need a Guardian...the SIL has taken it on herself to take this position. The SIL was also the one who poo pooed the POA option, when it was first mentioned. She would not of been the one chosen.

 

My wife is somewhat hesitant to report "mis-use" as she does not have 100% proof that this is going on (although it almost certainly is).

Link to post
Share on other sites

She doesn't need to even suspect foul play with her father's affairs - she's simply ensuring his affairs will be effectively managed in his twilight years. Having a card access to the account can be a useful stop-gap, but a veritable minefield should he die and probate is to be obtained. I could hit the fan big time. A POA at least is open to scrutiny and protects everyone involved.

 

As for the bank - again, the misuse claim can be modified somewhat that will require the revalidation of security on the account. If the signatures don't match or there is anything underhand going on to force the issue of validation it becomes a criminal offence, rather than just 'borrowing' the card that exists.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without a third party authorization or POA registered with the bank it will be difficult to obtain any information about the account but not impossible.

 

First step will be to notify the bank about FIL's mental incapacity, the bank should then stop all debit activity on the account until such time that the bank's investigations prove one way or another FIL's ability to run the account. Previous account spending patterns will be looked at as part of this process.

 

Another way would be to get the police involved and report your suspicions to them, this however does have it's own set of problems. The banks will still make it difficult to obtain the information required even though they have police liaison teams, and there can be no guarantee of any criminal prosecution. The other aspect to consider before going down this route is impact on family relationships.

 

In the absence of a criminal prosecution it would then become a civil matter between you, the family member(s) concerned and the bank. This will become a long and drawn out process, but is not insurmountable provided you have a lot of patience and are prepared to fight against the bank.

 

I wish you the best in what you decide to do.

The advice I give in relation to benefits should be viewed as general advice and not specific to your individual claim circumstances. I cannot give specific advice on your claim as I cannot access the claim.

 

If you find the advice useful please click on my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your FinL has sadly become mental incapable of looking after his affairs then any ordinary PoA will become void. An Enduring PoA (before 1 Oct 2007) or Lasting PoA (post 1 Oct 2007) will be required. To get these approved all near family members would be contacted for comment on the assignment of the attorneys (usually two - jointly and severally).

 

If neither of these exist then the Guardianship Agency (previously the Court of Protection) would step in and assign an Attorney, but control the dealing of the estate.

 

However, with a living spouse (MinL) that is mentally capable financial institutions will deal with them for joint accounts. I am not sure for personal non-joint accounts, but they probably would deal with the still-capable spouse. Your other family members are probably just helping her to deal with these institutions.

 

The attorneys are only able to deal with the estate on behalf of the donor (FinL). However, limited Gifts are allowed under strict rules. If you feel that the other family members are abusing the system then contact the Guardianship Agency, social services, police to see who can help.

 

You will need real evidence of wrong doing, rather than just because you are left out in the cold - sorry to sound unfeeling but most cases are just misunderstandings and sore grapes.

 

Good luck and do let us know how you get on,

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

If an enduring POA or a lasting POA exists, it is still possible that these may be void on a technicality.

 

Further to that read the bank's own T&C in relation to mental incapability and suspicion of fraudulent transactions.

 

9.3.1 Our liability

We will be responsible for any money lost due to

unauthorised transaction(s) unless you are liable under

clause 9.3.2. We will add back to your account any amount

deducted including any related interest (if applicable) and

charges. We will have no further liability to you.

 

10.3.2 If instructions are not actually given by you or with your

authority, unless clause 10.3.3 applies, we will refund the

amount of the unauthorised transaction including any

related interest (if applicable) and charges. We will have no

further responsibility to you.

 

10.3.5 We may refuse to carry out any instruction which involves a

transaction exceeding a particular value or if we feel there

is a reason to do so, such as a suspected breach of security.

We will tell you about this.

 

Taken from a well known banks T&C.

 

The bank has a duty of care under their own T&C to your FIL, and whilst no bank will give specific details of their own fraud prevention policies they do exist and it may be possible to claim any unauthorized transactions back from the bank. However you will need to deal with the bank at senior management level and with their fraud investigation department, which in itself is no easy task.

The advice I give in relation to benefits should be viewed as general advice and not specific to your individual claim circumstances. I cannot give specific advice on your claim as I cannot access the claim.

 

If you find the advice useful please click on my scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...