Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Steel Framed properties and Halifax


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6091 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I do not know where to post this one, but General Knowledge is as good as starting place as I can think…

 

I have a friend who bought a house 2 years ago. He tried to buy the one he was living in, but because it was Steel framed his Mortgage Broker talked him out of it as there could be problems later on in selling it or even remortgaging it, which in general is very true.

 

Well he found another house and bought it. Two years on it turns out that this house is also steel framed. He claims he never received a copy of the valuation that was done and so was not aware it was steel framed. If he had he would not have bought it. He spoke to his Mortgage Broker who was also shocked as he had told him not to buy that sort of building as well. The broker felt that the Halifax (that was his lender) did not accept steel framed properties two years ago and so wondered if there was a case here to ask the Lender for compensation as he should have been informed of the type of property and if they had noticed they would not have lent on it anyway.

 

Where should he being his enquiries and how? Or is he just stuck now?

 

Any ideas or advice would be appreciated,

 

Penfold

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not familiar with steel framed houses or whether that would be obvious to the valluer but there may be a few things to consider here.

 

there is a big difference between a valuation for lending purposes and a survey. It needs to be clarified what was paid for.

 

A copy of the valuation and any comments should also have been sent to his solicitor - who should have advised on any adverse comments.

 

Although a steel frame house may not be obvious on just a valuation( not sure on this point) a valuer should have some local knowledge of this type of property.

 

If the BS has lent with full knowldege of this fact - then presumably it should not be too much of a problem for other lenders..

 

just food for thought

 

 

jan

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Actually lenders vary a lot on steel framaed houses and the different types too (there are a few apparently). He paid for a valuation for mortgage purposes, so I guess the main thing is for him to SAR the lender, this should provide information regarding the valuation etc and he could also ask for their lending criteria at that time. Only 2 years ago and at this stage the lender is not being accused of anything.

 

Any other ideas please?

 

Thanks,

 

Penfold

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just another thought - was the buildings insurance arranged through the lender - and are they aware it is steel framed?

 

I dont know whether this would affect the premium or insurance - but what I do know ( having worked for a BS and insurance company) that unfortunately in the event of a claim thay would look for any non- disclosure of material facts - whether or not it affects the claim. therefore if either the solicitor or BS were aware of the construction they should have made your friend aware of the fact - otherwise he may have completed his insurance form incorrectly.

 

So I would definitely approach the solicitor ( they are paid enough!) for clarification of what was known at the time of purchase.

 

Jan:)

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jan,

 

Yes I agree that is another point. I think SAR the Halifax to find out what they know then hit them with why they did not notify the client of this major issue which means they would not have insured the property properly. I will need to ask him to look carfully at all paperwork including the sols letters regarding the buildings insurance

 

Thanks,

 

Penfold

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure that a SAR will be useful as this only obliges them to send personal information held on a person. Not details regarding a house valuation. Although I would imagine they would comply with an enquiry for information.

 

I used to own a steel framed property, the only way you could tell was from the steel beams in the loft. Incidentally it was also mortgaged to the Halifax, although the mortgage would have been taken out about 4 years ago. There are some lenders that refuse to lend on steel framed buildings, although they are as robust as traditional built houses.

 

 

When we first purchesed the house it was a repossession owned by the Woolwich. When the valuation revealed that it was a steel framed building they conducted a full structural survey and showed us the pictures of the steel frame which was in perfect condition despite being 40 years old. There were several houses built on the estate in the same way and they had always kept their prices in line with other houses on the estate built in a traditional manner.

 

There are some restrictions on what you can do such as you can not have certain types of cavity wall insulation, but otherwise we did not really see any difference and had no problems selling the property.

 

Valuations for lending purposes are not too thorough, although I would imagine that a look in the loft would be required. The trouble is it is the lender who chooses the type of valuation required. These can range from simple drive by surveys where the valuer does not even enter the property to more in depth valuations. Although lenders do not generally undertake structural surveys that is the responsibility of the purchaser should they wish to have that level of piece of mind.

 

Another problem is that the contract is between the lender and the valuer (although the lender will charge the borrower) the borrower is not privy to the contract and so has no right to sue on the contract. An action in tort law may be available. The case of Smith V Eric Bush established that a surveyer engaged by a lender may owe a duty of care to the purchaser provided the property was of a modest value and it was reasonable to assume that the purchaser would rely upon the valuation. The question as to whether the valuer would be liable is whether another reaonable valuer would have identified the house as being of steel framed. This would ultimately depend on the level of service which the lender had asked for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zoot,

 

Yes I agree with your point. These is a reason lenders do not like steel framed, but that escapes me at the moment. Also it depends on the loan to value. There are many lenders that will lend, but only to 75% LTV. I will have a think and see what documentation he was given. Then decide from there.

 

Penfold

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...