Not sure if this is in the right place, please move if not. Yesterday I received a 'Sorry there's a fee to be paid card' put through the letter box. I paid the fee of £5.00 online and received the item today. It was a Card from a friend. It had been posted using a 2nd class stamp. I was confused that it had attracted a not sufficient postage fee so without opening it I took it to my local post office had it weighed and put through the slot they use to test for thickness - clerk said that it should not have attracted the fee. Neither of us noticed at the time that the box ticked was for a 'Counterfeit' stamp. I go

Nail. On. Head. Hit.

The first thing is to let the surgery know that you didn't enter your car registrtaion when you visited and ask them to confirm to Euro that you were a patient on that day and Euro should cancel. The quicker you do that before matters escalate, the more lkely that they will cancel. You could suggest that they put up a sign reminding drivers to enter their vrm. thank you for posting the whole of the PCN which confirms that it does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 in two ways. [2][e] of S9 states (e)state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for serv

Another possibility that I've read about on another site is that the stamp had been used before and, because it didn't have a franking mark on it, the sender had tried to reuse it. Before the barcodes came in that would have worked because if there were no franking marks on the stamp there was no way Royal Mail could tell it had already been used once. However, it seems that Royal Mail now track every stamp used through its barcode and can tell if it has already been used. The system then rejects it as "counterfeit". HB, the changeover to barcoded stamps that made all the old ones 'expired' was a one-off event. Stamps don't generally hav

They're all barcoded now, I exchanged all my old unused stamps for the barcoded ones last year.

Thanks Andy I will report how tomorrow goes

Moorcroft do not do court nor buy debts.....take a breath and calm down do not fall for it. Andy

@Nicky Boy A chargeback on a debit card is not a legal right (unlike S75 of the CCA 1974) but there are rules that have to be followed and the ombudsman can step in. You're only really unlikely to fail a chargeback though in an unclear case and I don't think that's the case here.

Just click on > SAR < to read about it.

you asked for the CCTV footage but only by a simple line in a letter. it was not an SAR which can be legally enforced if they fail to comply with the footage. dx

pdfs merged, thread title updated. refer it to autonet. if there was money due from your use of the hire car that should have been sought from the other party under the settlement. Kinderton are up the creak here as they didn't get you to sign the agreement when they dropped off the car. Do Not Sign It. this is all to familiar to yea ole auxilis debacle covered here in many threads...scary very scary... Showing results for 'auxilis'. - Consumer Action Group this link points to the whole threads not the posts ..hit 'programmable' word below Programmable Search Engine CSE.GOOGLE.COM

As I understand it a chargeback is a right. The bank shouldn't need to "review" anything. You should get back to your bank and demand it. Tagging @dx100uk for advice...

Just CC to [email protected] PE discourage contact by e-mail but that address works and was used successfully by tutty1 last week. Good to hear you got such a quick reply from the court.

The aim when responding to their WS should be either get them to abandon their claim or give the Judge a heads up on the type of people that run these parking scams. In your case as you have a counterclaim the aim is to go for the second choice. if we look at Point 6 "My Company operates in accordan ce with the Code ". Really? The DVLA banned them in 2018. Point 9 they said the contract was included as Exhibit 1 . Exhibit 1 was not included and yet Joel Little signed the WS that he had told the truth. Point 11 They then claim that they don't need a contract to run the car park which contradicts PoFA 2012 Schedule 4 Secti

pers id say you can gain an extra 2 days and email not post. up to you though

Hello all, Hope everyone is well. Just a quick update on this. My bank has recently requested some more information about the case and are reviewing email interactions and receipts etc. I hope to hear back soon! JG