Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Steam is still needed in many industries, but much of it is still made with fossil fuels.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st Credit chasing old clydesdale Loan debt - help


Guest purplemushroomfairy2
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3234 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest purplemushroomfairy2

Hello,

First Credit bought a debt in 2014 that was 12 years old.

 

We had been paying the £1 a month to a firm previously,

I know, but at the time we hadn't realised we should have CCA'd everyone;

this one slipped through the net.

 

the debt had come off the credit file in 2013, although we were still paying.

 

We received a letter from First Credit in 2014 demanding payment; we CCA'd them. They don't have CCA.

 

We were checking the Credit file today, because by now surely after all this time the file should be as squeaky clean as it was in 2012

- no defaults everything OK.

 

NO!!! a credit score now of 1/5 because First Direct have replaced this very old debt BACK on the file as DEFAULT

- we are still trying to remortgage and now we know why we can't.

 

What can we do? I have reported this as inaccurate- but they never remove things anyway - this is pretty urgent.

 

Can anyone put the links to letters and CCA things we need to sort this out PDQ?

 

Thanks

Alison

Link to post
Share on other sites

who was the original creditor, and when did you originally default?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you saying that the OC registered a default on your credit reports and 6 years has passed and the debt fell of your report.

 

 

Now 1st credit has put the debt back on you credit report with a new default date? If so, very naughty indeed.

 

Not surprised though, they've just bought one of mine and brought forward the default by 6 months.

No doubt that when I point their error out and provide evidence, they will argue "whoops, admin error"

 

who was the original creditor, and when did you originally default?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest purplemushroomfairy2
who was the original creditor, and when did you originally default?

 

I think it was a finance house used by Staples,

we bought a laptop in 2002 on buy now pay later.

 

 

When I tried to pay the balance using my credit card they wouldn't accept it

so we paid monthly until 2005 when our business collapsed .

 

 

It was sold to AIC who the cab told us to pay 1 pound a month to which we did until 2010

when I discovered this website and requested CCA which they didn't have.

 

We stopped paying , received a letter in 2012 jam telling is the account was closed .

It fell off the file in feb 2012 after six years .

 

In 2013 first credit, then Connaught collections wrote to is we CCA'd them, no CCA put on dispute .

 

 

First credit then put it back on file in October last year as default - didn't tell us,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest purplemushroomfairy2
Are you saying that the OC registered a default on your credit reports and 6 years has passed and the debt fell of your report. Now 1st credit has put the debt back on you credit report with a new default date? If so, very naughty indeed.

 

Not surprised though, they've just bought one of mine and brought forward the default by 6 months. No doubt that when I point their error out and provide evidence, they will argue "whoops, admin error"

Yes exactly that - which letter do we now send and to whom?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes exactly that - which letter do we now send and to whom?

 

You need to write to the Data Controller at 1st Credit and tell them to remove the Account at all of the Credit Reference Agencies, if they refuse then make a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office.

 

In the mean time, obtain your Credit Files from Equifax and Experian, a paper copy is £2 postal order, if you apply online for the free 30 day trial, please remember to cancel or your Card will be charged up to £14.99 per month at each Credit Reference Agency.

You can also place a notice of correction against the file until this is resolved, this means that if you approach any lenders for credit, they will have to manually read your notes against that defaulted file.

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest purplemushroomfairy2

Ok will do, we are right then, they really can't do this can they.?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest purplemushroomfairy2

Yes, it was quick cheap and easy. Will apply for full paper report too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok will do, we are right then, they really can't do this can they.?

 

No,

Once the six years have expired and the entry has been removed by the Credit Reference Agencies it can never return.

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've always found noddle reliable in that the information is the same as that with the other agencys (default dates, ownership etc). Noddle is just slower at updating.

 

I usually check noddle every month and pay for a report from one of the other agency's approx every 3 months.

 

 

i assume your credit score of 1/5 was with Noddle, they are not so reliable, and are often out of date, you should get your report from one of the main CRA
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest purplemushroomfairy2
No,

Once the six years have expired and the entry has been removed by the Credit Reference Agencies it can never return.

 

Stigman

 

So, we should write to the data manager informing them that the alleged debt had been on the credit file from 2006 to 2012 and that it had been removed.

It has not been acknowledged since 2011 and had been placed in dispute.

I believe that Connaught collections who are also first direct do not have CCA.

Is there any legal speak I should put on the letters?

It can't be statute limited because we had been paying so it's only three years since we stopped - but if it has been on it can't go back on again regardless of limitation .

 

I think I am correct on that.

Sorry to be a bit thick but all of this has blown up again recently .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write to Data Controller at 1st C and demand removal from all CRA files

 

If they refuse complaint to ICO

 

Once initial default has been removed in 2012, it cannot be rereported

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Guest purplemushroomfairy2

Hi all,

 

we wrote to them, enclosing previous letters etc etc

They replied stating 'F&^% you! we will do what we like'

wrote to noddle - who also stated that they coud do what they like.

About to complain via FOS, ICO and will write again to 1st Credit.

 

Is there any part of the CCA that states that once removed it can't be replaced?

 

They were throwing quotes around - inclduing the fact that they didn't need a true signed copy of the agreement, which I believe they did as the orinating date was pre 2007.

 

noddle have also refused to add a marker to the file.

 

After 14 years I really believed that the bad time in our life was finally over.:mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you any evidence that a default was registered over 6 years ago?

 

As to them throwing quotes around, they will have cherry picked those that are in their best interests. As to thier argument that they dont need a signed copy, what they really mean is if it went to court they would have to show "on a balance of probabilities" that there was a signed fully CCA compliant agreement on inception. It would then be your job to argue otherwise.

 

Did they provide a reconstructed CCA when you requested the CCA and its just the original they don't have?

Link to post
Share on other sites

having or not a valid CCA is not required for whoever owns a debt

to be able to register whatever markers they like in the monthly summary

the only thing a debt buyer cannot do is change the original defaulted date issued by the original creditor.

 

the ico clearly state that:

All references to a defaulted debt must be removed from your credit files after 6 years

has passed from date of default, whether paid off or not.

.

{the WHOLE ACCOUNT WILL VANISH, never to return}.

.

{however, this does not mean the debt itself is not still owed

consider a CCA request.}

.

This is so that someone who continues paying something

- even after 6 years from default

- should not be at a disadvantage to someone who pays nothing after default

and ends up with a clean file after 6 years.

NOTE: {the bracketed text is not ICO guideline but my advise]

 

you need a past CRA printout to show the defaulted date

or

get it from the original creditor via an SAR

 

once you have proof

simply send it to the new owners that have brought the debt back on the CRA file

or reported a different default date

 

give them 14 days to sort it.

 

then off to the ICO

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Guest purplemushroomfairy2

Thanks , sorry been in hospital so just trying to get my head round it all before the precious six weeks is up!

 

In the bumf that they sent us was a detailed account of the debt.

 

 

Originally defaulted in 2005 sold on and we did pay for about five years.

 

 

We then sent CCA request which they could not fulfil.

 

 

Debt fell off in 2012, the statement clearly says account closed ,

we received a letter stating the account was closed .

We managed to get three remortgages we couldn't act in (another story )

 

Then the letters from 1st credit, CCA'D them

they wrote back saying they didn't have it , so we put in dispute again in 2013.

The default is showing as 2013- we have asked for it to be removed.

 

The CRAS are refusing to give us previous reports even though we know this has been placed back on file as a new default .

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need hard evidence that this debt was defaulted before and fell off after 6yrs.

 

 

the only way to do that is to sar the original creditor..who was?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest purplemushroomfairy2

Ok, would a statement of account sent to us by 1st credit showing default in 2006 - then five years payments of £1.00 then two years of nothing followed by a note in 2013 saying 'debt write off account closed ' count?

How do I get back copies of my credit reference file from 2014 showing the debt not there and 2012 showing it there ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need the record of a Default Notice or default being registered/sent from the comms or account log.

that will come with the sar.

 

 

a statement showing the account ws in default, it no proof that a default was registered

the above would be

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sar only ever goes to the original creditor...

 

 

which is?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest purplemushroomfairy2

It was 14 years ago , I think it may have been Clydesdale bank - not sure if they even exist now .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...