Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

alliance PPI claim - issues re SAR


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3996 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi guys - just need to run this past folk who are more knowledgeable

 

I am thinking of starting a PPI claim against A&L, just need to know if it's worth it?

 

I have a copy of my original credit credit agreement from when I took out the loan in 1998

which outlines payments, duaration, interest, PPI payments etc.

 

Everything was fine until I was made redundant in 2001,

after which time it was passed to a DCA.

 

Subsequently dealt with DCA and paid off arrears,

but during this time I was sent a letter by A&L in which they state they were cancelling the protection due to the arrears on the account

 

questions:

 

is it worth starting a claim from that far back?

Do I need to SAR them seeing as I have a copy of the credit agreement?

does the fact they cancelled the PPI themselves have an impact on the claim?

 

thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely.. they have had your money - and cancelled the policy when you were made redundant therefore preventing you from making a claim :)

 

Although if there are any other reasons such as you didnt request it, that it was implied it was mandatory in order to obtain the loan.. which gives further ammuntition that it was then cancelled at a time when you needed it most.

 

Have a look round the forum, in particular all the stikkies in the Payment Protection Forum :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

from 1998 it will be worth £1000's

no you dont - long as you know what you paid and when.

 

they wont have that data anyhow i bet now.

 

if they cancelled it, that mght cut the amount short

 

however, if they cancelled it,...did your PCM then go down?

should have

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply - unsure what PCM means?

 

so - long story short do I need to SAR them? or just go ahead and try to make a claim?

 

don't have a record of what was paid and when, just the agreed amount and date on the original credit agreement

 

This is going to be a steep learning curve for me as I have others i'd like to chase, looks like i'll be up late tonight reading as much as I can!!

 

i'll be back .............

Link to post
Share on other sites

Per Calander Month Payment

 

not much to read really its not diff

all you need is the data of WHEN you paid each month and WHAT you paid

[you obv missed payments so would not have paid PPI that month]

or

[you paid less than the monthly so paid less PPI]

 

imho

 

i would do this:

 

forget they cancelled it

forget you missed paymnt

 

just put in a claim as if you paid the PPI PCM every month

 

let them work it out

that you paid short & they also cancelled it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This first spreadsheet is the latest version of the statutory interestlink3.gif calculator and is used for Single Premium PPIlink3.gif cases. It can also be used where rollover PPI is involved, i.e. a new loan re-financing a previous one and where PPI is included in one or more loans.

 

StatIntSheet v101.xls

 

 

fill this in for every month [£23.71]

 

till its expected end date [48mts]

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK - downloaded the spreadsheet. I read the wiki tutorial, then read it again, and then again. I'm confused. Is there a real simple "hold your hand" guide to this process anywhere? I found my start date, so do I just calculate 48months from then? Do I then add the 8% to the final total?

 

23.71 x 48=1138.08 + 8%

Link to post
Share on other sites

no read what i said in post 7

 

your enter the date for EVERY MONTHLY PAYMENT [the 48mts from start date]

then 'ppi payment' [the same thing - copy n paste] in every row of the next col.

then the amount for each moth [23.71 ] [the same thing - copy n paste] in every row of the 3rd col.

 

thats all you have to do

 

the spready does the rest.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

right then - did the spreadsheet and came up with a figure. When I send in the letter do I include a copy of the spreadsheet as proof of my calculations? Do I also let them know I have a copy of the original agreement or keep it quiet to use if they become difficult?

Link to post
Share on other sites

two more bit of paperwork first

fill this in:

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/ppi.html

 

and write a SIMPLE BRIEF covering letter

 

give me my money back!!

 

the FOS CQ covers the reasons WHY you want it back

 

post all 3 recorded to A+L

 

FOS CQ + SOC + covering letter

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

have recently sent santander a SAR re. my old a&l account

 

I used the template which specifically requests proof of history/document destruction signed by the officer responsible etc. and their reply has left me confused;

 

"we would like to advise that historical information can only be retained for legitimate reasons, so some data may no longer be held as it has been deleted in line with our data retention policy. We can confirm that we have sent you whatever personal data we still hold in relation to the above customers account"

 

I have received nothing at all from them, as well as no confirmation of destruction including the methods used as requested - am I being fobbed off?

 

They also state they have fully complied with my request by;

"providing all the personal data we hold for the respective mortgage account and is that which you are entitled to under the data protection act"

 

I have to point out at this stage that I have never had a mortgage, with ANY lender, so would appreciate advice as how to proceed. They still have 10 days of the 40 left, and have cashed my cheque for the £10 fee

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

sent santander SAR in august and no reply within time limit even though they cashed the cheque. Eventual reply was delay tactics claiming I needed to identify myself. Resubmitted SAR again no reply within time limit. Eventual reply was along lines of "old account, you are asking for too far back, we are not obliged to keep records beyond 6 years so yours have been destroyed"

 

sent PPI claim and reply yesterday was rejection (which i am going to fight, will create seperate thread) but along with their reply were copy statements of my loan account - which they should have sent me when I sent in a SAR which they claim they don't have in the original SAR response.

 

I'm sick of these twisting ba$tard$ and their delay tactics, runarounds and obvious lies. What can i do now? I have already sent complaint to ICO but short of court action and a whole lot of heartache that this would create is there anything else I can do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can i jump in here. I too have done the same as u and also got nothing back. Am interested in the advice u get

sorry i cant offer any. I have sent many letters to chase this. Even had a text message saying they had dealt withy request but recieved nothing.

Please add to my reputation....

SUCCESS - Capital One PPI, Three Mobile charges, Orange Mobile charges, MBNA PPI

Wonga, Lowell, MMF 2 accounts, Provident x 3 Accounts, (ALL Unable to provide CCA)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are supposed to keep records for 5/7 years AFTER the financial relationship has ended.

 

You could ask to see a certificate of destruction!

 

So they, cashed your cheque - failed to respond to SAR - then when you chased them up they ask you to prove your identity ? They are supposed to ask for any further information in a timely manner. So I reckon you might want to either have a look at BCOBs and see if there is anything there you can use - links in my signature - highlighted in Green.

 

Or you can make a complaint to the Information Commissioner.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your responsibilities and obligations to data protection

 

The above link takes you to the guide for business on how they are to deal with DPA requests.

 

 

 

 

Guide to data protection – definitions, principles and practical examples

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could ask to see a certificate of destruction!.

 

I already did in my SAR - got the usual "we have provided everything you are entitled to under the act" etc and a statement claiming destruction but no evidence

 

UPDATE:

 

spoke to FOS on phone today, they seemed very interested in my case but in the first instance advised me to write to them again pointing out the fact that I have evidence of PPI on the account, as well as a succesful claim on the PPI itself. I suppose at the moment it's my only option, as the FOS will probably take over 12 months to investigate if I hand it off to them.

 

I have read somewhere on the web that if I do instigate FOS then santander will get charged a referral fee in the region of 850quid? If this is the case then surely it's in their best interest to pay me off and make me go away now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I already did in my SAR - got the usual "we have provided everything you are entitled to under the act" etc and a statement claiming destruction but no evidence

 

UPDATE:

 

spoke to FOS on phone today, they seemed very interested in my case but in the first instance advised me to write to them again pointing out the fact that I have evidence of PPI on the account, as well as a succesful claim on the PPI itself. I suppose at the moment it's my only option, as the FOS will probably take over 12 months to investigate if I hand it off to them.

 

I have read somewhere on the web that if I do instigate FOS then santander will get charged a referral fee in the region of 850quid? If this is the case then surely it's in their best interest to pay me off and make me go away now?

 

Yes, this is correct there is an investigation fee charged to the banks. I don't think they give a damn if they are charged or not - they will no doubt write it off to expenses !!

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

UPDATE:

 

sent santander a letter outlining my argument and pointing out the errors in their response, "strongly advising" them to look at my claim again. Also mentioned their breach of the DPA and my complaint to the ICO.

 

Got a response in which they apologised profusely for errors made on their behalf, made me an offer of settlement over and above what I was claiming AND a further payment as a goodwill gesture

 

what a result - got to get my other claims moving now as this was my "test case" to see if I could do it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done, I will mark your thread title as a success :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

alliance & leicester loan from 1997

 

sent in a SAR to which they replied by saying it was a historic account, they had destroyed my info and that, bluntly, I would get nothing as I had been sent everything I was entitled to

 

submitted PPI claim with copy of original credit agreement (I throw very little away) showing breakdown of monthly payments including PPI. Their reply stated that my accounts showed no PPI attached, and they included a statement showing all my payments. GOTCHA - you previously told me you had destroyed all my data? wrote them again, strongly suggesting they reconsider their position as I had written evidence

 

a:to the contrary

 

and

 

b:of them lying to me in my SAR response

 

also told them I was making official complaint to ICO in respect of breach of DPA 1998, the OFT, the banking ombudsman and also handing off my claim to the FOS for which they (now santander) would be liable for a £850 referral fee

 

got reply back - profuse apologies, offer of settlement £300 over and above what I originally claimed and a £25 goodwill gesture payment as an apology

 

result

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent.

 

As this was your "test" case, I would hope the others go more smoothly.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...