Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Minicredit advice please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4425 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, was wondering if anyone can help me. I took a £100 loan with mini credit which meant I pay back £147, I have payed £50 which leaves just under £100, however I keep receiving letters saying I owenearly £600 which is ridiculous. I called to set up a payment plan but they were so rude & unable to do so, so I left it. I have now received a door stop collection notice & I'm scared incase someone comes & takes stuff from my home, can this happen? I even asked mini credit to pass my file to a debt collection company, that way I know I can pay back monthly installments till it's clear. Do I have to pay back that extra £500 or can I pay back the original settlement? Please help, I'm terrified :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally borrowed £100, then as I said it meant I was to pay back £147, I've paid £50 but the loan amount stands at £570. I have read the other posts, just wanted relevant advice to my own post!! What about the doorstop collection? And what about my details being passed to a DCA.. What happens next..

Link to post
Share on other sites

You still only owe £97, not the amount they claim.

 

Wait and find out - they will be in contact soon enough. Stop trying to think ahead at the moment, deal with the debt as it comes up in the pile. This is a low priority debt and they cannot contact your employer (as you are unemployed)

 

As you are unemployed try and get an appointment for CAB or call National Debtline.

 

As far as passing to a DCA this lot don't. They may try Marshall Hoares Bailiffs but they cannot use bailiff powers when collecting a common commercial debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just fired off this email to them.....

Good evening.

 

The extra charges you have applied to my account are laughable and also the threats of doorstop collection are too.The letter stated they would visit between 17th February and 24th February.I had to take unpaid time off my work so I could meet then but they didnt show up. I am therefore considering making a claim for loss of earnings against your company.

 

I have tried to come to a satisfactory conclusion with you but everything is just thrown back.

I suggest you hurry up and either take me to court or accept my repayment plan of £50 per month for 9 months(£400 initial loan+£100 for 1 months interest less 2x£25 amounts you managed to take from my card).

 

I await your response.

 

Took loan of £400(received 480.50 after transfer charge!!!) end of November ,they claim I owe them £1371 on website or letter I received today says £1330!

Worst company I have ever dealt with bar none!

I will post the reply I get in due course.

2nd July 2012 EarlyPayDay a/c Cleared!:-D

26th October 2012 Wonga,Go Cash & Pounds to Pocket CLEARED!

30th November 2012

Pounds to Pocket CLEARED!

Payday Express CLEARED!

Speed Credit CLEARED!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just fired off this email to them.....

 

Good evening.

 

The extra charges you have applied to my account are laughable and also the threats of doorstop collection are too.The letter stated they would visit between 17th February and 24th February.I had to take unpaid time off my work so I could meet then but they didnt show up. I am therefore considering making a claim for loss of earnings against your company.

 

I have tried to come to a satisfactory conclusion with you but everything is just thrown back.

I suggest you hurry up and either take me to court or accept my repayment plan of £50 per month for 9 months(£400 initial loan+£100 for 1 months interest less 2x£25 amounts you managed to take from my card).

 

I await your response.

 

Took loan of £400(received 480.50 after transfer charge!!!) end of November ,they claim I owe them £1371 on website or letter I received today says £1330!

Worst company I have ever dealt with bar none!

I will post the reply I get in due course.

 

 

Well folks,here is the response...

 

You may find the partly repayment possibility on Your MiniCredit.co.uk online

account 24/7 and use it for payments of any amount. You accepted the Loan

Agreement and therefore also the charges that have been added according to it.

 

As You are asking for the possibility for being able to make partly payments we

would like to refer You to the \\"Repayment\\" possibility on Your

on-line account.

 

Microcredit Ltd does not forward Your account to a third party collection agency

within 90 days from the due date and our own Debt Recovery department will deal

with the issue instead. On the 90th day overdue we will start Legal proceedings

against You.

 

Please read more about Your responsibility to make sure that the debit card

details are up to date from Your Loan Agreement that is available on Your

MiniCredit.co.uk account. The partly payments can also be made with Ukash

vouchers.

 

We are also willing to consider the possibility of a settlement figure if it is

reasonable and paid in full. Please contact our Customer Support on the number

08718903015 when You have funds available to offer as full and final settlement.

If the settlement is agreed, the payment has to be made with a debit card

immediately.

 

 

 

 

Kind regards

MiniCredit.co.uk

 

Can anyone make some sense of this?

2nd July 2012 EarlyPayDay a/c Cleared!:-D

26th October 2012 Wonga,Go Cash & Pounds to Pocket CLEARED!

30th November 2012

Pounds to Pocket CLEARED!

Payday Express CLEARED!

Speed Credit CLEARED!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore it. You only owe them the original loan amount plus one months interest MINUS what you have already paid. If they demand more, refer them to the fact that since the abolition of the Rule of 79, Section 87 of the CCA Act has preference, and it clearly states that if the original loan term has ended (the one month period) then only the loan and interest are due. Even big companies can only charge 3 months interest on outstanding loans. There are dozens of lawsuits in regard to this that have successfully been won and proved it beyond a doubt.

 

 

(Thanks to sillygirl1 in another thread for that very useful bit of info).

 

Basically minicredit are trying to scare you into paying the huge amount. Notice how they say they will accept half as a settlement. This is because they know that you dont owe the amount they say and are trying to get anything they can.

 

If they try to contact you again saying you owe the huge amount, state the above again and offer them what remains of your original loan plus the one month interest. Let them know that you give them 14 business days to respond, and if they dont respond within the timeframe ( meaning the reply must be in your inbox or on your doormat in those 14 days, then you will consider the debt fulfilled and settled and any form of communication from themselves or their representatives AFTER this period will be deemed as harassment and treated as such.

 

Also make sure you send a copy to:

 

http://www.tradingstandards.gov.uk

http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk

 

and ensure you note that in the letter to minicredit as well.

 

Play them at their game. You could even go as far as saying that any letters sent to you by them after the 14 days will incur an "administration charge" to cover the cost of you reading it, of whatever you feel like putting. You could even say £50 per letter. Trust me. Ive done it with a few Companies that were hounding me 6-7 years ago when i had already paid off the money i owed.

 

 

They will not take you to court, and if they try to register a default on your credit rating, then enter a claim in court and sue them. Instructions to do this can be found on this site.

 

 

Feel free to see the thread i created about my sisters problem with them. After delving deeper, we came up with a few good titbits to ensure that we win.

Edited by renegadeimp

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is NO proof that the loan + 1 month interest advice is correct sadly

 

CAG does not endorse such claims

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore it. You only owe them the original loan amount plus one months interest MINUS what you have already paid. If they demand more, refer them to the fact that since the abolition of the Rule of 79, Section 87 of the CCA Act has preference, and it clearly states that if the original loan term has ended (the one month period) then only the loan and interest are due. Even big companies can only charge 3 months interest on outstanding loans. There are dozens of lawsuits in regard to this that have successfully been won and proved it beyond a doubt.

 

 

(Thanks to sillygirl1 in another thread for that very useful bit of info).

 

Basically minicredit are trying to scare you into paying the huge amount. Notice how they say they will accept half as a settlement. This is because they know that you dont owe the amount they say and are trying to get anything they can.

 

If they try to contact you again saying you owe the huge amount, state the above again and offer them what remains of your original loan plus the one month interest. Let them know that you give them 14 business days to respond, and if they dont respond within the timeframe ( meaning the reply must be in your inbox or on your doormat in those 14 days, then you will consider the debt fulfilled and settled and any form of communication from themselves or their representatives AFTER this period will be deemed as harassment and treated as such.

 

Also make sure you send a copy to:

 

www.tradingstandards.gov.uk

www.consumerdirect.gov.uk

 

and ensure you note that in the letter to minicredit as well.

 

Play them at their game. You could even go as far as saying that any letters sent to you by them after the 14 days will incur an "administration charge" to cover the cost of you reading it, of whatever you feel like putting. You could even say £50 per letter. Trust me. Ive done it with a few Companies that were hounding me 6-7 years ago when i had already paid off the money i owed.

 

 

They will not take you to court, and if they try to register a default on your credit rating, then enter a claim in court and sue them. Instructions to do this can be found on this site.

 

 

Feel free to see the thread i created about my sisters problem with them. After delving deeper, we came up with a few good titbits to ensure that we win.

 

 

The thing is what do I do now?

Do I continue to bombard this sad excuse of a company with emails,letters?

Or do I pay them £50 a month until I reckon my dues have been paid?

Or do nothing and wait for them to react?

2nd July 2012 EarlyPayDay a/c Cleared!:-D

26th October 2012 Wonga,Go Cash & Pounds to Pocket CLEARED!

30th November 2012

Pounds to Pocket CLEARED!

Payday Express CLEARED!

Speed Credit CLEARED!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

One letter is sufficient. Outline YOUR preferred payment plan or settlement. Tell them that their payment plans are impossible for you to abide by and then give them 14 Business days to respond. See what they say. Make sure EVERYTHING is in writing. Never contact them by phone and ensure you state in your letter or email that all contact to and from minicredit is to be written communication only.

 

For the amount you owe, Take the total loan amount, add £50-100 on top for interest (depending on the loan amount), then subtract what you have already paid.

Edited by renegadeimp
clarification

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is NO proof that the loan + 1 month interest advice is correct sadly

 

CAG does not endorse such claims

 

dx

 

You mean apart from the multiple lawsuits with gave way to legal precedence resulting in even major Financial corporations only being allowed to charge a max of 3 months interest, even if the account was in multiple years of default?

Edited by renegadeimp

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mean apart from the multiple lawsuits with gave way to legal precedence resulting in even major Financial corporations only being allowed to charge a max of 3 months interest, even if the account was in multiple years of default?

 

Hi

 

I'm doing some stuff in this area....can you please let me have some links to these cases as they may be useful.

 

Thanks

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

am not a fan of quoting that Acts have been repealed when they haven't and don't normally use legal terms such as lawsuit - it is CASE LAW in the UK anyway....The 'rule' quoted is the 'rule of 76'.... it hasn't been repealed, just altered.

 

Even big companies can only charge 3 months interest on outstanding loans. There are dozens of lawsuits in regard to this that have successfully been won and proved it beyond a doubt. - I did NOT at any time say there are dozens of loawsuits on this matter, I do not have recourse to such information.

 

Just clearing up this as a few people have commented to me about the misquoting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is NO such thing as a rule of 76. There is, however, a rule of 78 - which is all to do with how some lenders USED to calculate early repayment costs on loans; this rule is no longer used. The new method is outlined in The Consumer Credit (Early Settlement) Regulations 2004. I can't see the relevance here.

 

We've been asking for evidential proof of these claims for months and yet nothing has been forthcoming. We're keen to ensure that the advice given on CAG is accurate, so any help would be gratefully received.

 

Even big companies can only charge 3 months interest on outstanding loans

 

Are you sure about that also?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did not say that - that is my point, part of this has been completely misquoted.

 

I am now backing out of this thread as I am not getting into the 'we need evidence' as I cannot provide it, I do not have the resources, time nor knowledge of how to find 'evidence' other than the threads I have helped on.

 

Wish I had just left this thread alone!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore it. You only owe them the original loan amount plus one months interest MINUS what you have already paid. If they demand more, refer them to the fact that since the abolition of the Rule of 79, Section 87 of the CCA Act has preference, and it clearly states that if the original loan term has ended (the one month period) then only the loan and interest are due. Even big companies can only charge 3 months interest on outstanding loans. There are dozens of lawsuits in regard to this that have successfully been won and proved it beyond a doubt.

 

 

 

 

Unless you can provide proof of these "dozens of succssful lawsuits" this is very dangerous advice to keep repeating.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really dangerous when even major companies can only charge 3 months interest. Otherwise the debt would keep mounting and it would become impossible to pay back. The payday loan companies try to bend the rules as much as they can. I mean cmon; some are charging over 200 for a loan that's less than 10 days overdue.

 

Also read up on the cases that were taken to court and had the interest wiped, plus the fact that the OFT are fully investigating the business.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really dangerous when even major companies can only charge 3 months interest. Otherwise the debt would keep mounting and it would become impossible to pay back. The payday loan companies try to bend the rules as much as they can. I mean cmon; some are charging over 200 for a loan that's less than 10 days overdue.

 

Also read up on the cases that were taken to court and had the interest wiped, plus the fact that the OFT are fully investigating the business.

 

Yes you are correct...the OFT are investigating PDL companies.

 

Can you point to any information to these cases of 3 months interest please?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really dangerous when even major companies can only charge 3 months interest. Otherwise the debt would keep mounting and it would become impossible to pay back. The payday loan companies try to bend the rules as much as they can. I mean cmon; some are charging over 200 for a loan that's less than 10 days overdue.

 

Also read up on the cases that were taken to court and had the interest wiped, plus the fact that the OFT are fully investigating the business.

 

 

Sorry, I think it is you who needs to read up on cases.. Have a look round the Legal Issues forums and you will see that some debts have tripled in size due to the interest being added - Plus if a judgment is awarded against you it is likely that post judgment interest will be added to the debt.

 

Yes, some debts have been wiped by courts, but that is more to do with infractions of the regulations / no paperwork, etc.

 

There have been one or two instances where.. when a defence of an unfair relationship has been used, the Judge has reduced the interest. But we have still to see these judgments.

 

But certainly not because of some non existent law that allows for only 3 months or 1 months interest to be applied.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...