Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

letter from the Tocatoo / Lowell


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4796 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hello,

I was wondering if anyone would be able to give me any help or advice.

My boyfriend received a letter today from tocatto ltd stating he owes £37.91 outstanding balance from a 3 mobile contract phone he had 5 years ago.

 

4 years ago this debt went to a Debt collection agency, I think it was moorecroft I cant quite remember, and he agreed to pay £10 a fortnight until it was paid. This debt was paid as I myself went to the royal bank of Scotland and paid the £10 a fortnight until it was all paid.

 

About 2 years later we were sorting through paper work and thought we would no longer need the payment receipts from this debt so decided to throw them away.

A year later , about this time last year, we received a letter from another DCA informing my boyfriend he still owed the outstanding £37.91.

He phoned them and told them that he had paid the debt to which they asked for proof of payment. When he told them he had non as the receipts had been thrown away they told him as far as they were concerned without any proof of payment the debt was still owed.

The person he spoke to was very rude and unhelpful and didn't give a damn and kept insisting he must pay. My boyfriend quite bluntly told them that they would not receive any money from him as the debt was already paid. The conversation kept going round in circles eventually the guy from the DCA put the phone down on him.

We received another couple of letters and each time he phoned the company and told them the same thing. The debt has been paid and they will not get any money. Again they told him without proof then he still owes it.

After about the 3rd letter we never heard from them again or any other DCA concerning this account until today.

 

My partner hasn't rang Tocatto yet and we will probably hear the same cock and bull story from them.

So I was wondering if anyone had any ideas how to get rid of them once and for all without having the pay the debt a second time.

Any help would be very much appreciated

Thx in advance

Bec

Link to post
Share on other sites

firstly

 

NEVER EVER phone a DCA!!

 

they have NO LEGAL POWERS

to do anything bar send threat-o-grams

 

pers i would ignore the fleecers

 

i would suggest you do a bit of reading in this forum

 

you'll soon get the idea

 

as this has been paid-off anyhow

this shows what typically happens in the case of these 'phantom' mobile phone debts

it goes straight to the DCA's pocket without any record being place against your name on the phishing list

 

it get sold on & the next one tries their luck as you've proved to be a soft-touch.

 

the debt [if it ever existed] would have been written off against tax by the OC years ago

thats why the OC have neber asked themselves for the money!

 

well you've learned now - don't get caught again!

 

never ever believe what these fleecers say!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been reading stuff but not quite sure as to what to read or where to start. there is just so much information. Any payments we have made since to anyone we have since kept proof of payment and will do so for a very long time and so far so good with the rest of the debts. Just this one keeps cropping up like a bad aftertaste :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bec,

 

Rant continued....

 

Moorcroft work as follows.....mobile phone company pass your details to moorcroft, they contact you to say hello out-standing amount please pay, you pay, moorcroft say Here you go mobile phone company and thats it....BUT on the occasions were that they/moorcroft "Buy the Debt" they do not sell it on again to a third party.

 

Hope this helps!

 

Hotmamma :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bec,

 

Please take this advice...."DO NOT PAY THEM".....understand! You both know that you have paid and you can either print of statements from your bank via the internet or pay your the bank for copies which will show your payments and even ask the bank to supply you with a copy of the "in full and final settlement". confirmation of the closure of this debt.

Know think of it this way, this and it is a [problem], if this company chases 10 people at what seems to be the average amount of £30,that equals £300, so times that by 100, 1000, 10000.... get the picture, nice little earner. And because it is such a small amount, most people would pay it. But not us, we are out to screw them. Now, Don't forget if they contact you TELL THEM to prove that they own this debt and that they have "12 WORKING DAYS NO LONGER TO SUPPLY THIS" .....OR....THE DEBT IS UNENFORCEABLE!!!!!!

Check out all that has been said about this [EDIT - PLEASE REFRAIN FROM PERSONAL ABUSE]hole of a company and if they are rude to you on the phone, stand up, take control and threaten them, i told them to feck off, but that's me!

 

Oh, and when i spoke to Moorcroft, the guy told me that this sounded very odd and to be aware it could be a [problem] and to call ofsted! what's that telling you???? Keep us all posted, but for your own piece of mind get proof from your bank, also call moorcroft and give them any details regarding the phone contract they should be able to locate it in the past history they number is: 0161 4752858.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...