Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Post Office Car insurance cancellation rip-off


robert_harper_2000
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6319 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

Brothers car insurance with the PO tried to cancel it today as he has bought cover elsewhere. It started March 24th 2006 - March 23rd 2007, to cancel it costs £35 admin fee with cancellation rate of £90.67 comes to £125.67 my £4.77 refund works out I owe them £30??

 

Is this right?

Help me to help others!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably yes, the policy is over 8 months old so although its pro rata refund. Its the same with most insurers.

 

Why did he take a new policy when he was already covered?

In Insurance, thinking "It wont happen to me" could mean you dont have the cover you want at a time when you want it! - Dont always reject a Courtesy Car or Legal because you find the cost too much! Whats more valuable? YOU or the Policy Premium?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please add to my reputation if my reply was informative to you. (click the scales);) Replies offered by me are not linked to anyone, and is from my own personal experience.:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Started reading through the T&Cs and not much covering cancellation. Nothing about admin fees or short term rates etc?

 

Gonna call them and moan! lol

 

Cancelling this insurance

 

You may cancel your policy with immediate effect by notifying us by phone or by post. Our contact details can be found on the reverse of your certificate. Premiums c\an only be refunded if no incident has occurred which has led to a claim or may yet lead to a claim against this policy. If you return the certificate of Motor insurance within the first 14 days of receipt of your policy documentation we will refund that part of the premium which relates to the period remaining after we receive the certificate. After that time the following rules apply:

If you cancel within 12 months of the policy start date we will calculate the premium for the period of cover based on our short period rates in force at the time. In the second and subsequent years the premium will be calculated in proportion to the period of cover. When we receive your certificate(s) of motor insurance we will refund any remaining surplus premium you have paid.

Help me to help others!

Link to post
Share on other sites

oops should have transfered his cover to the new vehicle,:confused: may as well let the policy run to build the ncb,may work out that the discount makes up the difference on the refund.there is nothing to say that he cannot still insure the car even if he no longer owns it:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is nothing to say that he cannot still insure the car even if he no longer owns it:)

 

He is not insuring the car; he is insuring himself to drive it.

 

It is a subtle difference, but in UK we insure the driver, not the car. The car is merely a factor of risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

mmmm can,t see your point there, as i wouldn,t take out a policy and pay for insurance if i wasn,t gonna drive:| ,what i mean is that by changing his policy with the p,o say to third party only he may then get money back on the policy thus not having to pay a cancellation fee:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

He prolly is still in his cooling off period but he wants to add his girlfriend to the policy and it is a different car ( I now understand you insure the driver not the car but for different cars it is different prices.

 

PO was more expensive.... he got qoutes of about £800 the new policy was £400 so quite a difference. Perhaps I could try changing the policy to third party...

 

Oh also he has been told he needs proof of no claims and something about you can't have a policy in place whilst you tell the other insurance you have had so many years of ncb as it is still in place..??? ~Is this making any sense - if not I'm not suprised! it took me a while to get my head around it!

 

Thanks

Help me to help others!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately the cancellation fee is lawful, as there is work involved in cancelling an insurance policy (this is after all a legal document). The motor insurance bureau needs to be contacted (police have access to this to check that cars are insured) and for FSA compliance this needs to be done within 14 days, so unfortunately the cancellation fee is justified.

 

Don't know if you have a cooling off period with the other policy. The cooling off period is limited up until the new policy starts, after that the cooling off period is void, and a cancellation charge can be imposed.

 

For future reference you could have contacted the original insurer and asked to change the car over, they would have been able to do that for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes ,you can only use ncb on 1 policy,if you can change to third party only you need to tell them that you wish not to use your ncb and can they send you confirmation of proof of it.unless you weren,t with the p,o before this policy started you,ll need to contact the previous insurer

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...