Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Huntingtons man attacked by kids- stamped on his head.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2469 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Rich was attacked and had his head stamped on by 2 kids.

They threatened him on the bus the day before and he saw them the next day on the bus.

He not thinking straight and took the bus ID off one of the kids and whilst doing so got him in a headlock.

 

 

The Police said this was assault and theft.

The kids chased him down and called friends to join in.

 

 

They stamped on his head and punched and kicked him to the ground.

He had grit in his head and he had a seizure.

 

 

The police has said he needs to write a letter of apology to the kid he took the bus pass off.

He was part of the group and was bragging about it on FB and the local paper picked up the story.

 

 

These kids will have to do community service.

A more detailed version is below.

 

 

I don't feel he should write a letter of apology and I think these kids should have something on their record saying they hunted down a disabled man who couldn't walk and stamped on his head.

 

Monday 26th at 6pm Richard phoned me at work to say he was threaten and is worried and didn't know what to do.

He said 2 girls and 2 boys were there and they had kicked his sandwich and put their feet on his seat.

There was one behind him and one in front of him.

 

 

One of them stared at him and said he was going to cut him, "I will kill you" "I'll cut you from here to here" "I'm gonna stab you".

They kicked his seat and were threatening.

 

 

He said he stared back as he was worried they would attack him if he turned away.

He said he had just come out of hospital and isn't well.

He heard another passenger say leave him alone he isn't well.

He said he told them it is on CCTV.

But they didn't care.

 

 

He got off the bus at Stanmer Villas which is a stop earlier than he normally gets off as he didn't want them following him to his 4 year old daughters school.

I contacted the Bus company who advised me to contact the Police which I did.

They call me back the next day crime reference 47170090324.

They advised they would take a look at CCTV.

 

Tuesday 27th. Richard was with me till 1pm at Portland Road Hove.

I had to take my son to Water Babies so he left.

 

 

I got a call from Richards wife to say Richard was missing and something had happened on the bus.

I immediately drove to Hollingdean phoning the Police on the way.

My girlfriend contacted the Bus company.

 

I arrived at Surestart and heard kids laughing about an ambulance in Roedale Road and "it was kicking off".

Then my girlfriend called me to say he had been found in Roedale Road.

 

 

I drove down and saw Richard in an ambulance he was having a seizure and was unable to control his movements.

Due to the Huntingtons Disease, stress exacerbates the condition.

 

 

Richards movements are usually unstable but under stress he can't control his movements.

Please speak to the officers who dealt with him and escorted us to the hospital.

They will confirm this.

 

Richard told me he had seen the boys who verbally assaulted him and tried to get off the bus.

He saw one had a bus pass and made a grab for it for ID for the Police.

 

 

He tried to run away and got to the Surestart Centre but accidentally went through a wrong door and ended up outside.

He ran away but three of them saw him and chased him.

 

 

He tried to barricade himself behind a gate in someones garden.

But they caught him.

 

 

He said he remembers being punched and kicked and they were laughing calling other people on their phones.

Then he can't remember anything until the hospital.

 

My Mum was attacked in a park as people thought she was drunk ( she had Huntingtons )

my other brother Andrew was attacked in BP Petrol Station,

he also went back in after being attacked to get the Taxi drivers ID badge who attacked him so the Police could identify him.

 

 

I would be logical and think that is a risk and you would get ID from CCTV but Huntingtons affects how you think.

Huntingtons is a horrible disease.

 

 

My brother is worried about picking up his daughter and doesn't want to be scared to walk around.

He isn't allowed to drive and buses are the only way he can get around.

He doesn't claim any benefits and you can speak with the ladies at the Surestart Centre and his daughters school

- he is a nicest person ever.

 

Prob repeating myself but here is more information.

Since this the kid said he was attacked by Rich.

The Police said Rich took his bus pass and got him in a head lock before running away.

This is considered theft and assault.

He was part of the group that attacked him on the Monday but wasn't the actual one that threatened him.

 

I tried to explain he was trying to identify them as the Police and bus company weren't interested.

The police said he needs to come to the custody centre and be questioned.

 

 

I went to the custody centre and police station and begged them to speak with the officers when he was attacked as it put him in a seizure and this wouldn't end well.

 

 

They wouldn't take any notice and so we went to the custody centre.

He got so anxious he couldn't stand and it took another two police officers to help hold him still.

The senior officer said get a wheelchair he has to come in even though he couldn't walk or sit and was all over the place.

 

 

It took another 2 people to hold him in the wheelchair and try and wheel him into the police custody.

He fell out in the hallway and the Sargent said this is a custody centre he can't do this here (have a seizure)

he said get him home or to a hospital.

The officer helping called an ambulance.

Help me to help others!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to speak to a solicitor about this. That would be the best advice to give. Especially as the police sound pretty Inept

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...