Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

leaving UK for AUS, what happens with my debts?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2599 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I'm really interested in this, not because I want to completely avoid debt but because I want to gain some leverage in negotiations over a loan that I'm struggling to pay.

At the moment the lender has rejected any attempts I've made to reduce the monthly amount and are now threatening court action.

 

I'll be leaving the UK for Australia soon to rejoin my family so I'm considering this option.

 

Just a question to clarify,

 

I understand that a CCJ is enforceable in the courts in Aus so need to avoid this by being out of jurisdiction.

 

What I don't understand is why,

once the debt is sold to an Aus collection firm,

they can't start proceedings in Aus to recover the money.

 

Surely if they own the debt,

they can legitimately start a court action in Aus for the debt.

 

Do they not just because it's too expensive it is there a legal reason why not?

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the main reason is that Aussie courts are much more fussy and old fashioned ( i have heard this from someone who has practised in Aussie courts) . If Aussie Lawyers really wanted to get involved in this by commiting money, they would have done so by now. And there are probably not many former UK residents taking debts to Aus, as financial stability would be part of the Visa application. Australia is now more expensive cost of living wise, than most parts of the UK, but depending on job type, they can pay more.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm trying to understand the risks involved in leaving a UK debt if I move to Aus.,not because I want to completely avoid debt but because I want to gain some leverage in negotiations for a loan that I'm struggling to pay.

 

At the moment the lender has rejected any attempts I've made to reduce the monthly amount and are now threatening court action.

 

I'll be leaving the UK for Australia soon to rejoin my family so I'm considering this option.

 

Just a question to clarify, I understand that a CCJ is enforceable in the courts in Aus so need to avoid this by being out of jurisdiction.

 

What I don't understand is why, once the debt is sold to an Aus collection firm, they can't start proceedings in Aus to recover the money.

 

Surely if they own the debt, they can legitimately start a court action in Aus for the debt.

 

Do they not just because it's too expensive it is there a legal reason why not?

 

Thanks in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What type of debt ?

 

When did you take out the account with the lender e.g. Before April 2007 or after ?

 

Approx how much is the debt ?

 

Is the debt still with the original creditor ?

 

You do know that it is pretty uncommon for original creditors to issue court claims themselves, as they prefer to apply default to credit records, then write off against tax, before selling the debts on to Debt Collection Agencies. It can be years after a default, before any court claim is ever issued and sometimes there are so many debts being chased that they don't bother. So don't presume that an unpaid debt always results in a CCJ.

 

Best advice is to advise creditors of your Aussie address once this is available, so they can stay in contact with you. This should avoid sneaky CCJ by default using last known UK address. You could get an Experian account or other credit reference account before you left the UK, so you can keep an eye on it. Just ask them whether you can access from outside the UK. If a default is added, you can ask credit reference agencies to add a note that you reside in Australia. Creditors will note Aussie address on your credit record.

 

UK courts are very well known as being helpful to creditors over a long period and this includes foreign ones. But Aussie courts are not as helpful, even though there is a commonwealth debt agreement. Aussie courts seem to need a UK CCJ, before they will look at UK debts. Perhaps they don't have any case law or rules in Australia that allows foreign debts fo be heard in an Aussie court, unless the foreign debt has already been considered by the foreign court. I have not come across Aussie court cases reported online regarding UK debts, but this is not to say they don't exist.

 

Very unlikely a UK debt would follow you to Australia. UK creditors struggle enough to collect debts in the UK and probably would never bother to strike deals with Lawyers in other countries. It might be different if the debt was for say £100k or it was a business debt.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi unclebulgaria,

 

you mentioned that financial stability will affect the visa application process. I thought that a person has to be of "good character" (i.e, without criminal convictions), but his/her credit record back at home will not be questioned. Have things changed recently and do AU immigration officials now also ask for a credit record?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please give more details on the debt. There is various advice depending on the debt itself. FOr instance, your creditor should generally NOT refuse a reduced rate of repayment on an amount owed if you can show that you are in financial difficulty as it would be a breach of their credit licence and guidance on debt collection. Then theres the whole thing of irresponsible lending if you qualify for it.

 

Note generally as it all depends on the debt

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi unclebulgaria,

 

you mentioned that financial stability will affect the visa application process. I thought that a person has to be of "good character" (i.e, without criminal convictions), but his/her credit record back at home will not be questioned. Have things changed recently and do AU immigration officials now also ask for a credit record?

 

Thanks

 

Last time i looked into the process, which was a few years ago, you had to go through a full financial check, just to make sure that you were able to afford to live in Australia. Therefore if you had continuing UK financial commitments, these would be taken into account. I am not sure they check UK credit records, but they ask for Bank statements etc.

 

If you are looking to go through the process you need to contact Aussie immigration for more information, as it is complicated and always changing.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Can confirm that credit records are not checked. I have been through the application process three times now (2007, 2011 and 2016) and what they are looking at is health requirements and criminal convictions. The immi website explains it further.

 

I have been through similar to yourself. I made minimum repayments (5 GBP per month) for a good five years after moving and then let them know of my new address. One of my creditors was sending annual statements for a while but this has now stopped, as have my payments.

 

I am waiting for them to ask for payment and then I will happily offer them a reduced settlement. From memory, I have paid off two out of four using this approach but the others, for some reason, are happy to not contact me, even though they have my address and I am not making payments.

 

Student Loan was a different story however and I put a lot of effort in to paying this off.

 

I checked my credit report a few years ago and it was completely blank. Maybe the debt collectors have applied for CCJs since then, but I doubt it. If they have then I can deal with it in the future as I have proof that they were aware of my AUS address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't figure out how to edit my above post but I just wanted to add that my comments around them not checking financial aspects relates to family visas (spouse etc). They do check bank statements for working holiday visas and a few others (such as retirement visas).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Mrs Hobbit

Credit records aren't checked. Bank statements and proof of income are. Just let them know your Aussie address and leave it at that.

 

Debts ar civil not criminal. i have not known of a UK debt being heard in an Aussie court. Don't forget each state has it's own jurisdiction and only if it is a Federal matter would it be heard in a federal Court.

 

To open an Aussie bank account you need a 100 points and these all relate to Aussie domicile; this is why the banks here are so eager to open an account for you in Australia before you leave. only catch is you wont have access to the funds for six weeks after arriving in OZ. This is what we checked out 6 months ago when back home and checking Hobbit's residency status and visa for Australia.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...