Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclays overdraft charges


Derfel
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2618 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I returned my partner's account to zero early last year.

 

Unfortunately there was a pending charge, and my partner didn't use her account or check the balance again until late last year.

 

It had ballooned into a large amount of overdraft from that one pending charge.

 

Barclays were unwilling to generously be sensible about it, and my partner wouldn't accept the terms of my offer of help,

 

which was that I'd return it to zero (for the nth time) if she closes her account, as Barclays don't deserve our blood to suck on, and she doesn't need a spare account.

 

Since then I imagine it's continued to balloon.

 

I imagine DCAs and court action have happened or will happen soon.

 

My options are:

 

1) Cave in and pay.

 

2) Refuse to cave in. Tell her to point out she has no income of her own, and they should accept the one charge with say a staggering 100% annual APR added, which is still a lot less than they want but they're still accepting something that sounds eye watering.

 

I have no idea about implications to credit ratings, so I think that will influence the decision.

 

Thank you very much for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what was the charge for and how much are we talking about now?

 

If you don't give us proper detail, there isn't much we can do to help you?

 

What kind of account?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BankFodder, thanks for the reply.

 

It's a current account. It was £20 of pending charges which kicked all this off. I believe there is a weekly charge for using the overdraft, and there's a high interest rate. I'm not sure if it's arranged or unarranged, but it was £200 when I had the discussion with her about me returning it to zero about 5 months ago. I dread to think what it is now if DCAs etc are involved. Obviously it's a bit difficult for me to really get precise details because it's not my account.

 

I'm mainly worried about implications due to credit ratings. Also money is tight at the moment, and I can't keep bailing my partner out when she ignores things.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you checked her Credit Reference Files to see if they have defaulted her ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

We need to know :-

 

1. If YP is actually willing to challenge the bank charges with your and our help.

 

2. The amount the a/c is o/drawn now per her latest statement.

 

3. What the banks' collection tactics have been so far.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies.

 

I'm trying to establish whether she wants help.

 

I've been told to either cough up the money or leave.

 

I think she's being a bit hotheaded and will calm down,

 

meanwhile I've told her to find out from Barclays exactly what's going on,

 

get print-outs of account transactions,

 

and check her credit file, and the sooner she does all this the better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, let us know ..................

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

" I've been told to either cough up the money or leave. "

 

By the Bank or your Partner.....not very apt on Valentines day :oops:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi again,

 

It turned out that it was a pending charge after the account had been returned to a small but positive number which took the account negative again.

 

 

About a week after this happened, the bank reduced the arranged overdraft to £10.

 

 

They have no record of sending a letter to tell her this,

and she is pretty sure she never got one,

as it would have caused action to sort it out on her part while it was still tiny.

 

My partner spoke to the bank and this had all since ballooned to £800.

This time though (going to a different branch must have helped)

they looked into it, and kindly reduced it to £215, as a gesture of goodwill.

 

So this is over the £200

it was when I offered to sort it out on condition she closed the account because

1) she doesn't need it

2) can't look after it and

3) I'm not prepared to have our blood sucked by them.

 

 

She still won't close the account, because she thinks they're being nice about it.

 

This works out at roughly 1000% APR on the original £20 of pending charges.

 

Furthermore,

we'd moved and she hadn't updated the address until this trip to the branch.

 

 

Two strange things happened,

a wage slip envelope came through the post to the new house with her name on it,

and inside it asked her to phone a number.

It could only have been related to Barclays.

 

 

Second, when she went to the branch her address was already the correct new one.

She hadn't changed it and the bank don't know how this happened.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If DCA's have been involved, I expect they may be responsible for the payslip and request to call a certain phone number. Have you checked online to see who was behind the phone number they gave.

 

About the bank changing her address without YP giving the new one, I have no answer for this. The only way to find answers is to send a SAR to the bank with the £10 fee.

 

But, if YP thinks the bank is being nice to her, she may not want to do this. Difficult to think how she came to this conclusion, seeing as the bank has stitched her up like a kipper.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The payslip envelope is from Wescot Credit Services trading as "2F". It's in a helpful Q&A format. One of the questions is "what is this about?" and its answer is mysteriously nothing but a very large integer.

 

Barclays say this hasn't affected her credit record... yet.

 

As for stitching her up like a kipper. Putting someone's arranged overdraft down to £10 is essentially saying they don't want to offer someone credit anymore. That's fine (I refer you to points 1 and 2 above), but they don't appear to have acted on that conclusion in good faith. No serious attempt to contact her and putting the overdraft at £10 seems to be a cynical attempt to get someone into more difficulty. At that point, the bank is saying they don't care about your continued custom, it's just about extracting what they can from you. And she still wants the account.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...