Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Landlord entering property without permission


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4251 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone.

 

It has recently come to my attention that the landlord entered the flat I am renting a) without my consent, he was showing potential new tennants around the flat so therefore he must have also opened my locked bedroom door, again without permission. b) he only gave me 3 hours notice, which was an answer phone message - not a direct call. Also, the voicemail was not left by him but by either his wife or a work associate. If it was a joint tennancy, would he only need permission by one tennant? I was not in the property at the time.

 

On one other occassion, a door was left open in the flat, either by my flatmate or by a worker - which once again I was never informed about.

 

As this is a breach of contract, would I be able to end my joint tennancy, (which is a year long) with immediate effect and would he be able to take me to court.

 

Thank you in advance for answers.

Edited by Armaghgeddon
Link to post
Share on other sites

You are renting a flat with others as a joint T?

 

Yes LL should have given 24hr Notice of impending visit, but any of your fellow joint Ts could have agreed, esp if they were likley to be in. IMO it does not require express permission of all joint Ts, esp if absent at time of visit. Neither does it matter who serves the Notice provided it was on instruction from LL. A door left open by person unknown? YGBJ!

IMO without evidence of LLs continued breach/unreasonable behaviour you do not have a case for summarily vacating T.

If it is a 12 month AST, how far in are you? Why is LL showing the property now? Is this a student let?

If you are still within fixed term the T can only be legally terminated by mutual consent or a Court Order.

What are other Ts opinions on LLs supposed single breach?

 

If you just want out, say so and we may be able to offer advice, but no one here can predict a Judge's decision with so few facts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do want out but my flatmate is also being difficult with me allowing a replacement tennant which the landlord agreed to. So this is the only way possible. As for the flat door being opened, it has happened three times in the past 5 weeks, on one occassion my flatmate blamed a builder and I happened to have left my rent in the kitchen for landlord.

 

Landlord entered property without permission as far as I am aware. The other tennant might have agreed, but I think he has entered the property on more than one ocassion. Builders/Painters have also entered the property without me even being informed. Many viewings have taken place since that first voicemail so I think he is helping himself to enter the property.

 

It is a student property, I have also been told that if he knocks the door three times and if there is no answer before entering then he is not breaking the law.

 

Would it matter if one tennant agreed but I didnt even by on the basis of bein given short notice?

Edited by Armaghgeddon
Link to post
Share on other sites

if no one is there who is going to hear him knock??

 

LL should be giving 24 hours for any visits being made unless it is for urgent repairs. Entering a locked room without prior 24 hr notice is a breach of contract, regardless whether he is showing potential tenants or not. Is this a private let through an agency?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if no one is there who is going to hear him knock??

 

LL should be giving 24 hours for any visits being made unless it is for urgent repairs. Entering a locked room without prior 24 hr notice is a breach of contract, regardless whether he is showing potential tenants or not. Is this a private let through an agency?

 

It is a private let. I can 100% prove that I did not give him any permission to enter property or enter my bedroom in either verbal or written forms. Although would it go against me for the very fact I did not reply to the answerphone message? And even if I did reply it was not enough notice?

 

The landlords wife or whoever she is states word for word when he will arrive at property and the voicemail time stamp supports that it is four hours before the time he was suppose to be doing the viewing. Could they claim they did not know about this particular law?

Edited by Armaghgeddon
Link to post
Share on other sites

It is ultimately LLs decision.

Do you have a joint T (all Ts named on one AST, or a single AST in your name, for room only + shared facilities?

 

When does the fixed term if a joint T?

LL has said that the tennant currently there has to agree, but as I said she is being judgemental/difficult on every tennant.

 

It is a joint tennancy agreement that was signed for a years contract, although I have also asked twice to look at the contract but no contract has been shown.

The tennancy is for shared facilities and room.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How far into the tennancy are you? you could always change the lock on your bedroom door? what are the reasons you want to end the tennancy early?
6 months into a 12 month contract. There are many reasons that I want to leave. The Landlord does not give enough notice to enter the property, they think half an hour is enough notice. While the landlord has said that I can find a replacement tennant, my flatmate keeps beng judegemental apart possible replacements by stating things like "They alook like they could cause trouble" or because she does not like the look of them - this is without even talking to them. On three seperate occassions I have went to enter the flat and the door has been left open, of course it isnt her fault it is always someone elses. While I have only spent 10 days living in the flat since August, my flatmate has managed to rack up a £160 electricity bill. While it is a joint tennancy and I am responsible for the bill also, I know for a fact that she uses an electric heater for her own personal use, and again she is being unreasonable about how much of the bill I have to pay. My girlfriend lives with 3 other people and her electic bill was £50! Furthermore, I do not have any receipts for paying rent, there was a rent book but it has mysteriously gone missing, and the landlord still has not given me a copy of my contract - sent him a text last night asking for a copy again.

 

 

One of the potential tennants said they wanted it, but then she turned around and said I want to talk to him first (she seen him in the flat and only said hello). I have all this stress and on top im in my last semester of university and I know I won't be able to afford the rent. So if it comes down to it, I might have to leave the flat and leave her liable for the rent. Uni comes first, im not wasting 3 years on this.

Edited by Armaghgeddon
Link to post
Share on other sites

You are saying that you wont be able to afford the rent but you knew what the rent was before taking on the tennancy. The issues with doors being left open is not sufficient reason to terminate a tenancy as I said change the lock on your bedroom door. If you leave the flat you will still be liable as it is a joint tenancy. as with the electric bill if it is in joint names you are both equally liable regardless of who has used the electric. It sounds as if you have personalitry issues with your other flatmate and sadly this is something that only you 2 can sort out. Did you read the agreement before signing it? To be fair I think you are commited to the full year but if you move out or get evicted for non payment of rent where will you go? do you already have an alternative place to live?

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are saying that you wont be able to afford the rent but you knew what the rent was before taking on the tennancy. The issues with doors being left open is not sufficient reason to terminate a tenancy as I said change the lock on your bedroom door. If you leave the flat you will still be liable as it is a joint tenancy. as with the electric bill if it is in joint names you are both equally liable regardless of who has used the electric. It sounds as if you have personalitry issues with your other flatmate and sadly this is something that only you 2 can sort out. Did you read the agreement before signing it? To be fair I think you are commited to the full year but if you move out or get evicted for non payment of rent where will you go? do you already have an alternative place to live?

 

It has only just staretd to become a problem with the flatmate. I am staying with girlfriend pretty much all the time, she and her housemates have said if you need evidence that you are never there you can ask us. It was the fact I was wasting over £200 a month living there. Me and the flatmate has an argument about the electric bill, she thinks that it is only fair that I pay half of it. I was an electrician before university, and I warned her about the electricity billl if she continued using the electic heater. She suggested that I move out if I was not willing to contribute to the bill and I agreed. So asked the landlord if I could end the tennancy, he said no. I then asked what if I found a replacement. He said then you can get out of the agreement.

 

Over the past few weeks I have been looking for a replacement. She has disagreed with all but one tennant, who was on DHSS and the landlord said he did not accept it. So the search went on, another few people were interested but she said no to them. So one guy said he would like it the other day, but he said that he could not move in untill he sorted his last tennancy deposit out. He met my housemate breifly who just said hello and ignored him. She said she wanted to talk to him after the viewing - after blatantly ignoring him when he was there. I think he has lost interest in the flat now, and as I had a suitable tennant found it is not going to happen because of her unbeliveable ignorance.

 

As for getting evicted, thats not a problem but I have a guarantor but my mum wont be able to afford it. I do have an alternative place to live.

Edited by Armaghgeddon
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it is up to the landlord who he allows to take the tennancy on but if he wants the approval of the other tenant then thats up to him. I may be wrong but reading between the lines it seems like you rented this flat then regretted it because you are spending so much time at your girlfriends. The arguments over the electric bill are just that if you both are named on the bill you are both liable regardless of who used it. Going into your room is an issue but as I said change the lock, but if the LL cant get in he cant show anyone around. Your housemate may be unreasonable in your opinion but if she is going to share a house with someone else then it is only fair that she is comfortable with them, someone who you think is suitable may not be in her eyes. I really do think you will have to keep paying the rent whether you choose to spend time there or not.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

OP states 'oxbridge style accom at peppercorn rent' so I assume not AST, poss accom 'tied' to employment or contractual T, so OP may need to read agreement closely re locks, but certainly unacceptable behaviour by College contractors. I might br inclined to go round to Dean's house, gain access and clean his internal windows/study, just to get his reaction on record! (not suggesting you break in, though)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...