Jump to content


Private Parking Scheme introduced - is clamping/removal legal?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5899 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My friend lives in a block of flats run by what used to be the council but is now a housing association. I visit him most days and park in the residents car park. He does not have a car himself, and in two years I've only once found space to be a problem.

 

However, They're just about to introduce a private parking company to look after the car park and permits have got to be applied for - free for a year, then you will have to pay. But, from their letters only vehicles registered/insured to that address will qualify. No provision seems to have been made for guests. Can they do this?

 

Also, check out the wording of the official letter he got.

 

...Newline Securities will monitor the scheme on a 24 hour, 7 days a week basis. Please be advised that any vehicle that does not display a valid permit or display a copied/altered permit will be subject to immediate immobilisation and the permit will be confiscated by the contractor. Any vehicle clamped will be given an hour to be released before it is removed.

 

Can a private company really take your car?

"Be reasonable, demand the impossible"

Link to post
Share on other sites

But since some kind of contract is already in place, it's more complex than that.

 

Does the tenancy allow for parking? Do the terms allow for a change in terms? If so, is the correct procedure being followed? Do the terms meet the tests of fairness imposed by various statutes?

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

display a copied/altered permit will be subject to immediate immobilisation and the permit will be confiscated by the contractor. Any vehicle clamped will be given an hour to be released before it is removed.

I wonder how they are going to get at a permit inside a locked vehicle. It is one thing to clamp or tow a vehicle, quite another to effect entry into it. If they did that I think you would have a valid criminal complaint on the grounds of interfering with a motor vehicle.

 

As to the other question you raised it is legal under certain conditions but as Zamzara has said there may be existing contract conditions in the tenancy agreement/title deeds that they may be seeking to change. They cannot do this of their own accord; it can only be done with the agreement of both parties. Your friend should check the terms of any tenancy agreement (if renting) or title deeds (if they own the flat) and compare that with the terms of the letter. It may pay your friend to seek professional legal advice. Ultimately they may be able to opt out of this scheme.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how they are going to get at a permit inside a locked vehicle. It is one thing to clamp or tow a vehicle, quite another to effect entry into it. If they did that I think you would have a valid criminal complaint on the grounds of interfering with a motor vehicle.

 

The permit 'may' remain the property of the issuing authority and they could request it to be returned or cancel it. Once the car was towed away they could technically refuse to release it unless the permit was returned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The permit 'may' remain the property of the issuing authority and they could request it to be returned or cancel it. Once the car was towed away they could technically refuse to release it unless the permit was returned.

 

I disagree. That would be insufficient to create a lien ove a motor vehicle.

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

The only interpretation permitted on this post (or any others I may have made) is that this is what I would personally consider doing in the circumstances discussed. Each and every reader of this post or any other I may have made must take responsibility for forming their own view and making their own decision.

I receive an unwieldy number of private messages. I am happy to respond to messages posted on open forum but am unable to respond to private messages, seeking advice, when the substance of that message should properly be on the open forum.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...