Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

help please - problem


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6003 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

Can someone please advise. I'm in a right muddle.

 

I made a claim a while ago for the last six years. I filed court papers and then they paid up the full amount.

 

I then decided to give pre-six years a go. I started again with the first letter claiming a smaller amount for pre-six years AND for further charges whilst my main claim was going through.

 

I heard nothing from them regarding my second claim, and then all this court stuff case started. I have now recieved a letter from them, saying they want me to sign something to say that the money I received was full and final settlement - in other words I then cannot carry on with this second claim. They say that if I do not sign the thing saying it's full and final settlement, then they will take the money back.

 

Can someone tell me what to do please?

 

Many thanks.

 

Regards Jayne.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

hi , im presuming you have been paid well before announcement of OFT case ? i would not sign papers and i dont think they can do that ,a moderator would be able to help SSL, Kenny the celt are site helpers and they no all ins and outs , hope this a little help :)

regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think they can do that either. Are you still using the account? If not I would leave it with a nil balance and they can do what they like.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks for the replies. Yes I am still using the account. Maybe I should open one elsewhere.

 

I got paid out before the OFT case, yes.

 

I am reluctant to sign the thing, because they still owe me money - they have taken further charges since my claim, regardless of whether I go back further than six years or not. Equally though, I do not want to give the money back :-(

 

Regards Jayne.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jayne, I have a cunning plan..... Why don't you amend their I accept this in FFS letter by adding "for charges incurred between x date and y date" - ie your original claim dates. They might not notice and it will leave you free to carry on:p

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

jayneuk

 

The templates for rejecting offers are here, but without seeing the original text of your letter from the Halifax, this sounds slightly different to me as it appears to be 'after the fact'.

 

Suggest you PM kennythecelt or sea-sidelady, who will either help answer your query themselves or escalate to a mod.

 

The OFT view retaliatory account closures in a very dim light so I cannot see them resorting to this straight away, but DK's advice to research a parachute account anyway is valid.

 

Regards and good luck

Mac

  • 04/04/07 - £104 exit fee refund - Portman BS
  • Halifax Current a/c 20yr (closed) - in progress - all 20 years statements recovered!
  • Halifax Platinum Card 15 yr - Court Action Commenced - all 15 years statements recovered!
  • A&L Current a/c - You're next..

Write to your MP and

COMPLAIN about the ANTI-CONSUMER way in which the OFT Test Case is being handled!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that it would also be good to get a sight of the letter BEFORE that one stating the terms of the offer they made to you when they paid up.

Dummie's Guide to CAG: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

Me v BofS: Charges: £13,048.10 #2a/c Statements from 08/01/01 received. Charges:£5,156.39 Information Commissioner's Office informed June 12th who wrote to BoS, June 22nd for non-compliance. #1a/c: passed to BoS Senior Review Team. Discovered 2 further a/cs, and 3 Loan accounts. "Goodwill offer" of £7,424.23 06/07/07. Accepted (partial repayment). 20/07/07 Top-up payments of £2,558.10 & £1,154.00

£11,136.33 paid back thus far.

New claim issued: 9/07/2007 for 3rd account: £500+ PRESSING ON!

Don't forget - when you win - a donation to CAG would be welcome!

If anything I've said has remotely been of any assistance, then please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good point Dusary.

  • 04/04/07 - £104 exit fee refund - Portman BS
  • Halifax Current a/c 20yr (closed) - in progress - all 20 years statements recovered!
  • Halifax Platinum Card 15 yr - Court Action Commenced - all 15 years statements recovered!
  • A&L Current a/c - You're next..

Write to your MP and

COMPLAIN about the ANTI-CONSUMER way in which the OFT Test Case is being handled!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

 

Can someone please advise. I'm in a right muddle.

 

I made a claim a while ago for the last six years. I filed court papers and then they paid up the full amount.

 

I then decided to give pre-six years a go. I started again with the first letter claiming a smaller amount for pre-six years AND for further charges whilst my main claim was going through.

 

I heard nothing from them regarding my second claim, and then all this court stuff case started. I have now recieved a letter from them, saying they want me to sign something to say that the money I received was full and final settlement - in other words I then cannot carry on with this second claim. They say that if I do not sign the thing saying it's full and final settlement, then they will take the money back.

 

Can someone tell me what to do please?

 

Many thanks.

 

Regards Jayne.

 

 

Hi, don't worry. We can get this sorted.:)

 

It is unclear what letter you have got. I think I know what it is but don't want to mislead you.

 

Can you type it up or scan a copy to your thread please- removing any reference to you which could identify you, inc calim ref and amounts.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks again for the replies, and apologies for my delay in replying - I have switched broadband providers and it all went wrong, so I was left with no connection for a few days. Anyway, I think I am back now!!

 

Right, I will scan the letter and post it here. Need to make my scanner work first, so it might not be until tomorrow.

 

Dusary, in answer to your question, I never got a letter at that stage. The money just appeared in my account.

 

Back soon.

 

Regards Jayne.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I have finally scanned the letter lol. Had to do it at my friend's in the end, because my scanner was saying it wasn't connected even though it will print stuff off my computer!!

 

Trouble is, I don't know how to attach it to here now. Can anyone help please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jayneuk

 

Check your PMs.

  • 04/04/07 - £104 exit fee refund - Portman BS
  • Halifax Current a/c 20yr (closed) - in progress - all 20 years statements recovered!
  • Halifax Platinum Card 15 yr - Court Action Commenced - all 15 years statements recovered!
  • A&L Current a/c - You're next..

Write to your MP and

COMPLAIN about the ANTI-CONSUMER way in which the OFT Test Case is being handled!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks MacBoy :-)

 

Here is the letter -

Dear Mrs jayneuk

 

We refer to your complaint about bank charges.

We wrote to you recently making you a goodwill offer in full and final settlement of your complaint about these charges.

 

We believe the charges are fair, transparent and lawful. Since we last wrote to you, the bank (and several other banks) became involved in legal proceedings with the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) about bank charges which we believe will resolve the legal issues on the fairness and legality of your bank charges.

 

We have asked the Financial Services Authority (FSA) to suspend the normal timetable for dealing with bank charges complaints, and the FSA has agreed to this request subject to conditions that protect your rights.

 

However, the goodwill payment the bank made to you still stands and you can accept or reject this offer. Please return the attached form, in the enclosed pre-paid envelope, within 2 months from the date of this letter. You should be aware that if you accept this offer, this will be in "full and final" settlement of your complaint.

 

This means that it is unlikely you would be awarded a further sum even if the test case indicated that you could be entitled to a potentially larger amount. Though this does not preclude you asking for repayment of any future charges if the court finds they are unlawful.

 

If you decide to reject this offer and await the outcome of the legal proceedings with the OFT you will need to return the money which we have already paid to you. We will reconsider your complaint once the test case is resolved. We can assure you (in that instance) we have registered and stored your complaint.

 

If we do not hear from you by 6th October 2007, we will assume that you have decided to reject this offer and await the outcome of the legal proceedings with the OFT. Please retain your bank records, as this will make it easier for you to support your complaint on resolution of the test case.

 

Once the legal proceedings between the OFT and the banks finish, we will resolve your complaint as quickly as possible and apply the (test case) principles. This may produce a larger or smaller figure when compared with the current offer.

We are sorry that we have not been able to respond in full to your complaint now, but we (together with the FSA and the OFT) think that it is necessary to resolve the key legal issues before we decide how we should respond to your complaint.

 

Obviously exactly what will happen next will depend on the courts. We do not know how long the case will take - we have promised to proceed as quickly as possible but inevitably given the importance of the issues being considered this may take many months to finally resolve. But we can assure you that once the legal proceedings are completed we will resolve your complaint as quickly as possible. If at that stage you do not agree with our conclusions you will of course be able to refer your case to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) (or to the courts).

 

Given this court case we have asked the FOS not to proceed with any other case they are hearing until the test case is resolved. FOS has indicated that as a general proposition it will indeed not proceed with cases which rely on the legal issues being considered in the test case.

 

Similarly, you should be aware that if you choose to issue a claim in the Courts, the bank will immediately apply to the Court for an order to stay your action until resolution of the bank's proceedings with the OFT.

We will keep you updated appropriately about the proceedings with the OFT. You can also check the latest position on our websites at Halifax Online

 

Thank you for your patience. Yours sincerely

Laura Thompson

Customer Relations Manager

Customer Relations

 

(consent form follows)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No worries Jayne.. ;)

 

Mac :D

  • 04/04/07 - £104 exit fee refund - Portman BS
  • Halifax Current a/c 20yr (closed) - in progress - all 20 years statements recovered!
  • Halifax Platinum Card 15 yr - Court Action Commenced - all 15 years statements recovered!
  • A&L Current a/c - You're next..

Write to your MP and

COMPLAIN about the ANTI-CONSUMER way in which the OFT Test Case is being handled!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jayneuk

I was under the impression that kenny was going to take a look at this for you once you and I had worked out how to get the text of the letter posted.

 

Did you not heat from him? I haven't seen him for a couple of days - he may be busy with personal/work stuff...and I'm going away on business for a cople of days tomorrow too. I'll see if I can get someone to help.

 

Mac

  • 04/04/07 - £104 exit fee refund - Portman BS
  • Halifax Current a/c 20yr (closed) - in progress - all 20 years statements recovered!
  • Halifax Platinum Card 15 yr - Court Action Commenced - all 15 years statements recovered!
  • A&L Current a/c - You're next..

Write to your MP and

COMPLAIN about the ANTI-CONSUMER way in which the OFT Test Case is being handled!

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK jayne - I've raised the alarm for you - someone should be along to help soon ;)

  • 04/04/07 - £104 exit fee refund - Portman BS
  • Halifax Current a/c 20yr (closed) - in progress - all 20 years statements recovered!
  • Halifax Platinum Card 15 yr - Court Action Commenced - all 15 years statements recovered!
  • A&L Current a/c - You're next..

Write to your MP and

COMPLAIN about the ANTI-CONSUMER way in which the OFT Test Case is being handled!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks MacBoy :-)

 

Here is the letter -

 

 

Dear Mrs jayneuk

 

We refer to your complaint about bank charges.

We wrote to you recently making you a goodwill offer in full and final settlement of your complaint about these charges.

 

We believe the charges are fair, transparent and lawful. Since we last wrote to you, the bank (and several other banks) became involved in legal proceedings with the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) about bank charges which we believe will resolve the legal issues on the fairness and legality of your bank charges.

 

We have asked the Financial Services Authority (FSA) to suspend the normal timetable for dealing with bank charges complaints, and the FSA has agreed to this request subject to conditions that protect your rights.

 

However, the goodwill payment the bank made to you still stands and you can accept or reject this offer. Please return the attached form, in the enclosed pre-paid envelope, within 2 months from the date of this letter. You should be aware that if you accept this offer, this will be in "full and final" settlement of your complaint.

 

This means that it is unlikely you would be awarded a further sum even if the test case indicated that you could be entitled to a potentially larger amount. Though this does not preclude you asking for repayment of any future charges if the court finds they are unlawful.

 

If you decide to reject this offer and await the outcome of the legal proceedings with the OFT you will need to return the money which we have already paid to you. We will reconsider your complaint once the test case is resolved. We can assure you (in that instance) we have registered and stored your complaint.

 

If we do not hear from you by 6th October 2007, we will assume that you have decided to reject this offer and await the outcome of the legal proceedings with the OFT. Please retain your bank records, as this will make it easier for you to support your complaint on resolution of the test case.

 

Once the legal proceedings between the OFT and the banks finish, we will resolve your complaint as quickly as possible and apply the (test case) principles. This may produce a larger or smaller figure when compared with the current offer.

We are sorry that we have not been able to respond in full to your complaint now, but we (together with the FSA and the OFT) think that it is necessary to resolve the key legal issues before we decide how we should respond to your complaint.

 

Obviously exactly what will happen next will depend on the courts. We do not know how long the case will take - we have promised to proceed as quickly as possible but inevitably given the importance of the issues being considered this may take many months to finally resolve. But we can assure you that once the legal proceedings are completed we will resolve your complaint as quickly as possible. If at that stage you do not agree with our conclusions you will of course be able to refer your case to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) (or to the courts).

 

Given this court case we have asked the FOS not to proceed with any other case they are hearing until the test case is resolved. FOS has indicated that as a general proposition it will indeed not proceed with cases which rely on the legal issues being considered in the test case.

 

Similarly, you should be aware that if you choose to issue a claim in the Courts, the bank will immediately apply to the Court for an order to stay your action until resolution of the bank's proceedings with the OFT.

We will keep you updated appropriately about the proceedings with the OFT. You can also check the latest position on our websites at Halifax Online

 

Thank you for your patience. Yours sincerely

Laura Thompson

Customer Relations Manager

Customer Relations

 

(consent form follows)

 

Hi Jayne,

 

Just subscribing to your thread so forgive me if I do not know the complete ins and outs of your claim so far.

 

Firstly, this appears to be a pretty standard letter at the moment as I have received one exactly the same, so there is nothing to worry about.

 

I too have commenced court proceedings and have also opted to go beyond the six year limitation and this lettter didn't sway me. I am in the process of asking the DJ to have my stay lifted or set aside at the moment, as this account (when it was open) had all my benefit money paid into it. It's a long shot as it was closed back in September 2004, but it's worth a try I think.

 

I have also written a response to halifaxs customer relations department advising them of such, and once again refusing their offer of full and final settlement, as per the letter in the template section.

 

In relation to your current claim, I dont believe they are talking about making you return the money that has already been paid in settlement of your first claim. As I said, I think this letter refers to your current claim only and is meerly a template. One that has probably been sent to thousands of us around the country with claims outstanding.

 

you have two choices,

- You either accept the amount they've offered and call it quits or

- you reject their offer and if they apply to the court to have your claim stayed (if the court hasn't already done so) then you can try and have it lifted. The only way to do this currently is if this action causes you 9and your family, finanacial hardship, and there are templates for this.

 

All-in-all this is a minor blip and is nothing to worry about, honest:)

 

I hope this has helped to ease your mind, and if you have any questions then feel free to let me know.

:DSUCCESSESS:D

NATWEST01&02 won over 4k

See how

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-successes/31683-muggins73-natwest.html

 

:)CURRENT CLAIMS:)

HALIFAX03

19-SEPT-07 APPLICATION TO HAVE STAY LIFTED

02-OCT-07 APPLICATION REFUSED

LLOYDS TSB04

10-MAY-07 LBA

 

ABBEY05

19-SEPT-07 LBA

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, and in addition to the points above, this letter does not mention the closure of your account, which as you've already been advised, will be frowned upon if done as a clear result of your claim. So again, no worries there:D

:DSUCCESSESS:D

NATWEST01&02 won over 4k

See how

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-successes/31683-muggins73-natwest.html

 

:)CURRENT CLAIMS:)

HALIFAX03

19-SEPT-07 APPLICATION TO HAVE STAY LIFTED

02-OCT-07 APPLICATION REFUSED

LLOYDS TSB04

10-MAY-07 LBA

 

ABBEY05

19-SEPT-07 LBA

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would advisable to report their actions to the FOS/FSA, as it seems to be a clear attempt to use the upcoming test case to coerce claimants into accepting smaller settlements, and the FSA need to know that the bank is abusing the test case, it could help overturning the waiver due for review shortly. The review is due end of September, so time is of the essence.

____________

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply Muggins. I'm really sorry for the delay - only just back online after computer problems.

 

Sorry to sound thick, but I don't understand all of what you say. I don't know what a "stay" is.

 

Do I have to answer this letter or can I just ignore it? Should I carry on with my existing claim, because so far I have only sent off the first letter and the second is well overdue. If I continue with this claim, is there a possibility of me having to pay back what I have already had, because if there is then I will just accept what I have so far.

 

:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Report this letter to the FOS..!!!!!

 

Financial Ombudsman Service

 

You dont have to pay it back, carry on with your claim.

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...