Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This journo thinks Trump wants a Mafia state. The surest sign yet that Donald Trump wants to run the US like the mafia INEWS.CO.UK The Trumps want to make sure nothing like the rule of law stops them  
    • Yes. I'd be very interested to know how the defendant fared in putting forward the defence that the calaimant had been contributorily negligent by not keeping their cat under control. I'm aware that some people might find that fatuous, distracting or confusing, but the reality is that I'm not aware of any law that imposes a duty upon cat owners to keep their pets under control.  Whereas I believe the law does hold dog owners responsible for their dogs in public places. I'm not certain it was at all beneficial to the OP to suggest that blaming the claimant was a credible defence...
    • Okay, perfect. they did say BS is invoked as soon as i fill in their application form, ill get a pin. i had to press them more on this as they didnt want to discuss BS much. so i should fill in the form and get the pin, then i can initiate BS. What will follow and what should i do after? Thanks again for all the help and patience.
    • Good evening, so not a good weekend reviewing paperwork -- I have lost some proofs of postage.. also, although not provided at CCA, they have now supplied a DN in their WS, please see scan of claimants WS (without statements) Document with tick boxes as signatures doesn't look like an agreement and is split across pages. Documents have been stapled and copied multiple times looking at the top left of them. Aside from that, having read other threads, I suspect they have everything? appreciate your input please Sorry for heavy redactions, I noticed the paperwork was see-through LinkHalifaxCC1.compressed.pdf
    • Received a final demand today Final demand.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

General question about CCAs.


DigbyD
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6069 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Having just sent off some requests, I have a question about CCAs.

 

Is it more likely that the older an agreement the more likely it is they havent got an enforceable agreement? I just wondered that with lots of people now requesting CCAs will they start tightening things up so that five years down the line, askng for CCAs will be a waste of time because they will all have enforceable CCAs on request.

 

All my credit related debts were prior to 2000 with a selection of loan/credit providers. I wonder how those taking out agreements now will fare in a few years time when they request CCAs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would seem common sense that the older the agreement the more chance they havent got the original

 

However, it really is totally dependant on how stringent the lender is at keeping the docs -

 

Realistically, they must have a point where they dump them, otherwise you would have one heck of a lot of space taken up with millions of agreements

 

In fact, even if they do keep them -

 

a) whats the chance of finding them unless they have an extremely well organised filing system

 

b) very likely the original doc either is unenforceable due to missing prescribed terms etc, or incorrectly executed

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a lender can't be a***d to keep legal documents for the life of a contract, or don't execute the agreement properly in the first place, they deserve everything that comes their way!

 

I see what you're saying about future problems, but that all relies on the lenders getting their houses in order, and so far they haven't shown much inclination to do that. I have a feeling that they'll just come down even harder on those poor sods who don't know their rights in this situation - I think there are far more of them than there are CAG-types. :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everybody i had trouble with Orange a phone bill,They sent everything to a collection agency even sent somebody from scotcall which i believe is illegal.

I was paying through the cccs and one day decided to contact orange for and upto date balance,They told me it had be written off and would not chase me for the balance.

I now two months or so later have 2 letters from moorcroft the usual threats been here a few times.

Just wondering what to do with the cca are there any forms on here not sure what to do with them as far as orange are concerned they do not want to chase me up so these people at moorcroft are not either.

I started out £22000 debt 10 years ago and done my best clearing it now down to less than £5000.

Can anybody advise any help whats more sad i have been paying westcot for years a few thousand by now wish i new more back then.

Please can anybody help.

Thanks Alan:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Digby, the main point of making a CCA request is to ensure that the company chasing you for the debt is entitled to be doing so.

It is possible that when some DCAs go back to the original creditor asking for the executed agreement, that the OC may decide not to supply it simply because the DCA paid so little for the debt!

But I think you are right, that in the future it will be much more difficult to

find companies that cannot provide the executed agreement. And in time, they will also have got their brains into gear and will manage to produce

agreements that are lawfully drawn up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...