Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
    • As the electric carmaker sees sales fall and cuts jobs, we take a closer look at its problems.View the full article
    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant is an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

BCW - Again


murbay
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6081 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

 

I have read several of your threads against BCW and I'm after some advice really on how to proceed.

 

A couple of weeks ago I recieved a letter from BCW trying to recover over £1000 for a debt to TSB. I did have this debt back in 2004 but I also paid it (I have the original letter about the debt and I have the bank statement to prove it was paid 4 days later)

 

Because I knew for sure this debt had been paid I contacted BCW to tell them but was met with some hostility by what they claim to be a customer services department. I told them this was a debt cleared 3 years ago and I suggested they go back to TSB because they are trying to claim for a debt I have proof was paid. Having read some of the threads on this site with regards sending them proof I explained I was prepared to clear this up by providing evidence but I wasn't prepared to send it to them because I wanted to do this legally.

 

Since then I have had 4 conversations with them on the phone with each one being ruder than the last. When I complained to one member of staff about the attitude of the customer services department he gave me quite a bit of abuse about "Dont I dare speak badly about any of his colleagues and that they will screw me over in court" before hanging up on me.

 

On my final call the woman told me how I wouldn't get the chance to defend myself in court and that all they will do is have their solictior go to court and I will be charged £50 for each letter they send me. I gave as good as I got and she told me all calls were recorded then hung up.

 

I have since rung them and asked for transcripts of all the calls they and I have made because I shall be taking this through a solicitor. They then told me they don't record calls so are unable to provide me transcripts.

 

Since then I have now recieved a final notice, threatening interest and costs for a debt I have the proof of paying. I don't want to provide them with my proof for reasons others have explained on this site but I do want to clear this up and have them out of my life for good.

 

Is there any way I can go around this which isn't going to be costly to myself since technically I shouldnt be having to pay anything to clear my name for a debt I don't even have?

 

Also I did notice something interesting on the letters they have been sending through. The address is in Scotland but under the registration numer it says "Registered in England and Wales" surely by trading in Scotland they are in breach of this registration.

 

Any help on this would be much appreciated because it is now begining to cause me sleepless nights.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a letter you can use to cover this.

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

Account number: XXXXXXXX

Further to my recent telephone conversations with your agents I enclose recent communications in relation to this account.

 

I must admit that I am rather bemused as to why this account has been passed to yourselves, as you can clearly see it has been repaid to the original creditor since DATE.

 

My last letter from LTSB was DATE and intimated that my indebtedness has been cleared.

 

As you are aware The OFT Collection Guidelines would view this kind of activity as Deceptive and unfair.

 

Section 2.8i. failing to investigate and/or provide details as appropriate, when a debt is

queried or disputed, possibly resulting in debtors being wrongly pursued

 

 

Now I would respectfully suggest that this account is returned to the original creditor for resolution of these issues, as BCW cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities.

 

If BCW chooses to ignore my dispute and attempt enforcement, I will initiate legal action and file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service, HM Treasury Financial Crime Branch and possible court action.

 

I hope that this will not be necessary and an acceptable solution can be accomplished.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully,

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another good letter CB

 

You could also add a para on any action they may take and a closing para putting them in a time box for a reply i.e.

 

Should you nevertheless choose to initiate legal proceedings against me, I will expect to receive, with any Letter before Action, a copy of the documents that you will be relying upon as proof including a properly executed agreement, complying in all respects with the form and content requirements of the CCA was signed by myself in respect of this alleged debt.

 

If I do not receive a satisfactory written response from you within the next 14 days I will have no alternative but to report your conduct to the various authorities and organisations which are meant to police your conduct

I'm not an expert so check everything I tell you, however click me scales if I've been useful.

Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

 

There is no freemasonry like the freemasonry of Golf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for your resonses to my query, they were very much apprecitated.

 

Further to this and on advice of a solictor I contacted TSB directly yesterday to query this with them also which turned up some very interesting information. TSB do not hold an account for me on thier system and cannot work out where this debt has come from as matters were resoved with them immediately in 2004.

 

I have an appointment to speak to one of their advisors next week and present my proof directly to the bank. I shall still be following this up with BCW and I have already printed out a copy of curlybens letter with the extended paragraphs from conar and will be posting that out recorded delivery tomorrow.

 

I shall not explain to BCW about my meeting with the bank though I shall be asking the bank for written confirmation that they do not have any debt on their sytem and that everything was resolved in 2004. That way if BCW do continue to harrass me they will be in further breach of the guidelines and I will have solid grounds in which to persue legal action against them. Hopefully sticking it to them for all the stress they have caused not only me but everybody else on this site that has had the unfortunate pleasure of having to deal with them.

 

One interesting fact the solicitor explained to me yesterday was that if for some strange reason TSB had kept my account open and these were fresh debts, the bank would have to explain why the bank made no efforts to contact me since 2004. I haven't moved house though as I said previously the bank has no record of an account for me on their system. This information may help others out there who may find themselves in a similar situation.

 

I am still confused as to how their registration is for England and Wales yet they can operate out of Scotland. Is this legal?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...