Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • JK: Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have. Thanks DX, I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HAK V Sainsburys Bank*Court claim issued**WON**BALANCE WRITTEN OFF


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5052 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Letter sent telling them the default is void due to the following reasons.

 

Incorect time scale

Incorrect amount due to unlawfull charges

Still have not fulfilled section 78(1)

 

Lets see what they throw at me now.

 

HAK

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 244
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

After sending a letter telling them basically to go away or take me to Court they have sent me a final demand letter today saying they will pass on to a DC.

 

Cant wait for that!! I wonder who it will be.

 

They keep digging a bigger hole!!

 

Ive reported them to T/S today and sent all the info off to them.

 

HAK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant, HAK! I look forward to hearing how this one goes too. They took about 4 months to respond to my CCA request, but they did eventually resolve everything when I went to their Chief Exec. That seemed to spur them into action. However, I'm not convinced by the integrity of the 'CCA' they sent me as it's a signed agreement but with the present terms and conditions for the card stapled to it, not the terms and conditions at the time the card was taken out.

 

Sounds as if you and I have had similar issues with both Sainsburys and RBoS.

Bank and credit card reclaims - £9,806

Sainsburys CCA non-compliance with FOS;

Natwest reclaim of £340 in progress;

Egg credit card reclaim in progress

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE

 

T/S have requested the default notice, calling card and final demand notice so they can write to Sainsburys.

 

Also just got a letter from Sainsburys saying we are no longer going to respond to any more letters from me and if you are not happy contact the FOS. PS your account is still in arears please pay.

 

I am going to forward this to T/S. and any other they send!!!

 

 

HAK

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE

 

Sainsburys have sent me the same application form again and a 2007 credit agreement with terms and Conditions on. Apparently they have now fully complied with my request and I must pay the arears....ummm dream on Sainsburys.

 

Another letter to T/S

 

HAK

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sainsburys have sent me the same application form again and a 2007 credit agreement with terms and Conditions on. Apparently they have now fully complied with my request.

 

Yup... That complies with your request under the Consumer Credit Act. It doesn't however make the debt enforceable if the "agreement" is not of the prescribed form and/or content.

 

Think you need to look at this from a different angle now...?

 

Best wishes, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HAK, that seems to be you in exactly the same situation as I am with Sainsburys. Like Diskmandave suggests, I think I'll try this new tact.

Bank and credit card reclaims - £9,806

Sainsburys CCA non-compliance with FOS;

Natwest reclaim of £340 in progress;

Egg credit card reclaim in progress

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dave

 

Not sure what you mean on the above.

 

I have tried every letter under the sun and they are still not giving.

 

The last one was one of Toms saying take me to Court.

 

HAK

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you've sent them a letter stating the "agreement" is not of the prescribed form/content/unenforceable and you've sent a take me to Court letter then the fact that they're threatening a DCA just goes to show that they know they have nothing and will continue to pursue regardless, just like RW&C did with me.

 

So if that's the case i'ld let them farm it out and quickly point out to whoever gets it that it's in dispute and they're breaching OFT Guidelines on Debt Collection.. They do get fed up, eventually!

 

Is that as clear as mud now??! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Dave.

 

You never know T/S might bend over backwards for me as well.

 

Hold up did you see that flying pig:D

 

HAK

Link to post
Share on other sites

just got a letter from Blair Oliver and Scott saying pay up or we will take you to Court....Good thats what I want you to do you fools!!!!

 

HAK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are Tradings Standards in discussions with Sainsburys on the basis of their failure to comply with the time limits for requesting a CCA, or that the agreement doesn't comply with the requirements of the legislation?

Bank and credit card reclaims - £9,806

Sainsburys CCA non-compliance with FOS;

Natwest reclaim of £340 in progress;

Egg credit card reclaim in progress

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BGB

 

Not sure how T/S are going to play this but since I made the complaint about them they are been helpfull. I have told them I have not received an agreement just a card request form with no original T&C. I will be sending the letter received today off to them

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll email Trading Standards in Edinburgh today to add a bit of weight to what you are doing as they never matched the legal timescale, and what they did send was not in the correct form. The quicker they realise that Sainsburys and other lenders in the capital are routintely breaching these requirements, the better.

Bank and credit card reclaims - £9,806

Sainsburys CCA non-compliance with FOS;

Natwest reclaim of £340 in progress;

Egg credit card reclaim in progress

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Have you had any news yet from TS? I've heard a big fat hee-haw.

 

I've since also written to Sainsburys telling them that upon reviewing the CCA they sent me last year, I'm not convinced that it complies with the legislation and asked what they are going to do to satisfy the requirements of the legislation. The ball is in their court.

Bank and credit card reclaims - £9,806

Sainsburys CCA non-compliance with FOS;

Natwest reclaim of £340 in progress;

Egg credit card reclaim in progress

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

T/S have request a copy of my agreement and it looks like Sainsburys are ignoring them. Im going to see T/S face to face shortly so they can discuss this and the other 6 cases I have presented them with.

 

Already T/S have said that they may not take further action. Well If they do not I will be going back to my MP.

 

In the mean time Siansburys have passed it on to Blair Oliver and Scott....no suprise there!!!

 

HAK

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've also passed my Halifax stuff onto them without much luck. My Uncle is a TSO in another part of the country, so I think I'm just going to get hime to deal with it from here on in. I don't think Edinburgh's Trading Standards have much in the way of teeth!

 

Might be worth mentioning your problems to your MP and the Trade Minister?

Bank and credit card reclaims - £9,806

Sainsburys CCA non-compliance with FOS;

Natwest reclaim of £340 in progress;

Egg credit card reclaim in progress

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a reply from Gareth Thomas saying what T/S are supposed to do. I will show them the letter when I see them.

 

One more thing is the lady from T/S said there will be several people in the meeting. I hope they are not going to try and leacture me about my debt problem. If they do there will be trouble. I am thinking about recording the interview what do you think.

 

HAK

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear - so they've defaulted you while ignoring Trading Standards?!

 

With me, I prepared a complaint to the FOS today about the 'CCA' that was sent to my by Sainsburys. I imagine the FOS will take some time to even consider this and ultimately side with Sainsburys but at least by complaining I'll cost Sainsburys time and money!

Bank and credit card reclaims - £9,806

Sainsburys CCA non-compliance with FOS;

Natwest reclaim of £340 in progress;

Egg credit card reclaim in progress

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All

 

Been a mad couple of months my end and have not had time to breath>>>

 

Sainsburys today have issued a Court claim against me from the Bulk Centre.

 

Funny as it has come direct from them and not a DC.

 

CPR letter will be send Monday and acknowledgment to Court as well.

 

Watch this space I can see this getting very interesting.

 

HAK

Link to post
Share on other sites

HAK! Good to hear from you again! By coincidence I was coming on here to update my own Sainsburys thread - namely, FOS returned my complaint saying it is 'not their role to Police banks' :confused: so I've sent it back asking them to help consider and resolve a dispute not police anything.

 

Also, decided that I'm p*ssed off with Sainsburys not being able to present the appropriate documentation to me so I've complained to the OFT and asked them to consider their credit licence given their failure to observe the law and continued failure to observe the OFT's own Guidance Note on Debt Collection.

 

Feel like joining me in my complain, HAK?!

Bank and credit card reclaims - £9,806

Sainsburys CCA non-compliance with FOS;

Natwest reclaim of £340 in progress;

Egg credit card reclaim in progress

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...