Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The last photo shows the overflow carpark looking at the block which our room was located. When we got out of the car my partner thought that the building was for staff accommodation.  The unsecured bedroom window opened onto this car park.
    • Also I see that you are doing a lot of this on the telephone – and without any written confirmation. This is a big mistake. You need to start taking this matter seriously and so everything should go in writing. If you have telephone calls then they should normally be recorded. Read our customer services guide. You should make notes about every telephone call and then you should send an email to your telephone correspondence confirming what they have said or what they have agreed. It is important that you keep detailed paper trails here. Of course we may be jumping the gun and maybe big motoring world will step up to the mark – but I'm afraid that they have a lousy reputation has you have seen and so you need to start practising survival techniques and protecting yourself. You say for instance in your letter of rejection that the mechanic told you on the telephone that the gearbox needed replacing. Do you have any other evidence of this conversation? This is going to sound a bit harsh – but other people will be visiting this thread as well for their own purposes. You conducted their research about this company before you bought the vehicle. You now are fully aware that this is a company which can be very difficult to deal with and causes a lot of problems for many of their customers and yet you are still taking a telephone/verbal approach. Do I need to say any more? Also one of the documents you put up is an email exchange but it is not clear who is writing to who or what dates. If you showed this email to somebody in a pub they would be asking lots of questions about who sent the first message, who sent the second message, what dates were they sent et cetera. Please think about this before you post things. Please can you clarify the details of that email exchange. Please will you present the information carefully. We are all volunteers here and we have to rely on you to do the spadework
    • I told the DM that the room was not acceptable because of the reasons already mentioned. He informed me that they were full that night and that they could move me to the room next door (would not solve my problem with the rooms location). Told the DM that I could not stay in the room provided for the night so left no option but to leave. DM did not reply and I walked out.   IMG_1475.pdf IMG_1476.pdf IMG_1477.pdf
    • Please will you upload your documents in PDF format in future. It is unhelpful to have them in word format and also word documents will carry personal details relating to you and your computer.
    • Thanks for letting us know that you had a conversation with someone – I sort of imagined that you might tell us what the conversation was – who said what to whom…
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HAK V Sainsburys Bank*Court claim issued**WON**BALANCE WRITTEN OFF


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5075 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ive just been reading through my home insurance and I took out optinal legal cover.

 

I have just called them and they have said they might be a slim chance this would be covered.

 

Has anybody ever heard this in this site??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 244
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well why not go for it , it may help you if it comes to a court hearing(which i doubt), some moral support if nothing else.

If you do, let us know the details.... cant wait

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CCM

 

It is dated JUly 11th so it need to be there by next Monday.

 

I will send it special delivery on Wednesday just in case

 

HAK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hak, just wishing you the best of luck, your defence looks fine. Funnily enough got letter Friday and bearing in mind we are at about the same stage thought it would be from Sainsburys but surprise surprise it was MBNA despite my complaint being dealt with by FOS:mad: Anyways thought I'd hopefully make you chuckle, Sainsburys having said they would refer back to BOS so that I could resume paying (not) have passed it to Westcot who sent me a copy of the Card Request plus current T & C's, addressed the letter to my OH and said I had to deal (on one of their garishly stripey debt notification things) by 26th June, despite arriving in envelope postmarked 25th July! Have replied in the vein I'd have to be a time traveller, they are now dealing with my complaint!!!:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a letter from the Courts saying we have recieved your defence blabla.

 

No mention of the CPR request not been adeared to??

 

Whats going ion!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HAK

 

Standard automated response to defence submission 28days etc.. every defence gets one.With regards to your comments re CPR once your defence has been submitted it it passed to the claimant for their perusal and instructions to continue said claim.Courts dont get involved until it reaches the point of your AQ submission.If the claimant fails to respond then the claim goes to stay.If the claimant fails to submit their AQ then you get the claim struck out.So noncomplience at this stage is not an issue.

 

Just to clarify the proceedure and trust the above is of help

 

Regards

 

Andy

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

HAK, as andy says no one at the court would have even read your defence, and certainly wont know of your CPR request, at this stage, so dont worry everything is normal.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant believe this!!!

 

Got a letter of the Court yesterday saying "We have misplaced your defence and please can you send us another on to us by 29th August or the Claimant may obtain a judgement"

 

So I have got to mess around repriniting the defence, Q at the post Office & Pay £4.60 to resend something they have lost.

 

Not happy!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eh? Can`t you get a stay on this, so the Court finds you defense?

 

How the hell can they say we have lost your defense, so you`ll have to send another one or you`ll lose? That`s just stupid.

 

Let them give the Bank a judgement, then put a claim into the Court for the full whack, as they have admitted they lost your paper work.

If I have helped or made you laugh in any way in your hour of need, then please click my scales <<<<<<<<<< ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a letter from the Courts today regarding my complaint.

 

They say they will have a response within 5 days.

 

i want hold my breath!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got the final letter from the Courts about my complaint.

 

Basically saying we are sorry it is lost and we are given you £6 towards your Postage.

 

I rang the ICO office today and they think they may have broken the Data PA.

 

Will wait untill the case has been transfered to my local court then hit them hard!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well I it will be 28 days tommorow from the 1st letter from the Courts saying they have sent the defence but got a letter a week later saying they have lost it.

 

Thing is can I hold them to the first letter, as if this is the case it is last day tommoorw.

 

HAK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suggest you write or fax the court explaining the situation, ask if you can re-submit the defence, its not your fault they lost it, they obviously know you submitted it,. you must do something to avoid a default judgement.

Sorry i havent been through your thread again but no-one looks at anything at northampton its all automated, so you cant take any chances.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ccm

 

I sent my other defence in on the 20th of August.

 

The thing is I have a letter dated 7th August saying they have sent the defence off to the other party and they have 28 days!!!

 

So I am thinking I may be able to use this letter for a throw out...

 

Any ideas

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry i might be losing the plot, the way it works is,they issue a claim, you acknowledge service, you submit a defence, they have 28 days to file an Allocation Questionnaire.

So where does your second defence come in to this, or am i missing something?

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CCM

 

When I filled my defence in the first place I got a letter back from the Court saying , "they have passed it to the Creditor and they have 28 days to respond". This was on the 7th August.

A week later I got a letter from the Courts saying they have lost my defence and I have to re submit it.

 

I resubmitted my defence on the 20th August.

 

Basically I still have the letter saying they submitted my defence on the 7th of August.

 

Maybe the Court copy has just gone missing and not the claimants. There for as from tommorow the claimants time is up and it should be stayed.

 

Do you have to contact the court to tell them this or is it done automatically.

Also can you call the bulk cente court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...