Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Any update here?  I ask as we have others now taking on CPM.
    • I am sorry about getting your status mixed up.  I have noticed one thing in your excellent WS. On their claim they are only pursuing you as the keeper-I think it is  in their Point C that  states along the lines of -the driver did not pay , so the keeper is liable. So on your No keeper Liability section  You may prefer  to alter 13 to    . It is trite Law that the driver and the keeper cannot be regarded  as the same person and the claimant has failed to offer any proof who was driving.  BY  only pursuing the keeper  when the PCN does not comply with PoFA must mean that their claim fails. See what the Site team thinks as it should  stop the Judge from looking at who was driving as your statement preempts them from even thinking about it.
    • What would suffice as proof? I just emailed them back my date of birth. Should I send a copy of driving licence? 
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northampton   MCOL Northampton N1 ? Manual Claim CCMCC (Salford) ? New beta WWW.MONEYCLAIMS.SERVICE.GOV.UK ?   If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form.   This has been uploaded in my previous messages in the bundle of documents     Name of the Claimant ? Asset Link Capital (NO5) Limited   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to./   14/02/2020   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total Not relevant as his claim was set aside, and has now been brought to the court again by the claimant       Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please see bundle of documents in previous thread   What is the total value of the claim? £10,734.1    Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  Yes - this is one of the grounds for getting it set aside   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? No Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?  Apparently 2000   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? I do not recall entering into an agreement with Barclays   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  It was, but it is not anymore   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned to Asset Link   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No - although they have provided a copy of the assignment notice in their bundle of docs for the hearing   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I don't remember - but again a copy of a letter has been provided (see bundle on previous thread)   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  No    Why did you cease payments?  2015   What was the date of your last payment? December 2015   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?  I wrote to Barclaycard back in 2015 to ask them to send proof of the original agreement but they just sent me a reconstituted document which had no personal deals on relating to me   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? yes - step change took control and set up payments of £1 pm
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Agressive Barclays Action


PUMPKINPIPS
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6100 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:eek: Hello

 

First timer here, excuse the dumb questions, please. Any help will be much appreciated.

 

Just received a "Notice of Transfer of Proceedings", read through the defence - very agressive. The Allocation Questionaire has been dispensed with after a defence was put in.

 

So I understand that I now should write to the courts as well as prepare my court bundle.

 

OK, here we go: :???:

 

What are "Draft Directions for Disclosure" and where can I find them/the format?

 

Are there any links to Barclays T & C's? I have seen links for other banks but not Barclays.

 

 

Quite exciting really

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pumpkin and welcome to CAG! :)

 

Firstly, could you post the first 3 points of the Defence Barclays submitted? Likely they say something about you not providing details of exact charges, summary in nature etc. When you filed with MCOL did you follow up with sending both MCOL and Barclays a Schedule of Charges (a spreadsheet itemising each charge, date incurred etc)?

 

Unless you have received Directions from the court, you don't have to submit anything yet. If you have (apart from Notice that it's been transferred and that there will be no need for AQ), post the Directions from court on here; we can then advise exactly what you need to do, send, prepare etc.

 

Don't worry about the Defence appearing aggressive, what else would you expect from corporate solicitors - they tend to use one of several 'standard' Defences that they send out against all bank charge Claims.

 

You will likely get a glossy leaflet from Barclays shortly about the OFT Test Case and how they will be Staying your claim. File it and forget about it, don't waste time worrying about it, standard literature :)

 

Barclays T&Cs can be found in list of banks on http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/101412-document-library-work-progress.html

3 Active Claims:

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Sole account) - Applied to lift court ordered Stay

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) - Awaiting court date

Barclays Refund of Bank Charges (Joint account) Pre-6 yrs- LBA sent.

 

 

3 Wins :

Barclays t/a The Woolwich (Data Protection Act breach costs & compliance)

HSBC (on behalf of brother)

Settled Out of Court - £3,874.76

Alliance & Leicester (on behalf of friend)

Settled Out of Court - £723.41

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Welshcakes

 

Right, here are the first 3 lines/points of the defence - (The first amused me as its a Barclays Bank Plc current account, not Barclaycard - however I did think it was just a cut and paste job)

 

1. "Barclaycard is a Trading division of Barclays Bank Plc and not a legal entity in its own right."

 

2. "The Particulars of the Claim do not provide details or particulars of the account in question and/ or the precise charges alleged to have been unlawful, or the date thereof. Furthermore, they give no recognisable cause of action, nor is there sufficient material to enable Barclays to serve more than a bare denial of liability as a defence. The Statement of Case would appear to be an abuse of process and / or will obstruct the just disposal of the proceedings and it does not appear to comply with CPR r16.2."

 

3. "The defendant respectfully requests an order that the claim be struck out pursuant to CPR r3.4 as it does not disclose reasonable grounds for bringing a claim and is an abuse of the Court's process."

 

____________________________________________________________

 

MCOL

 

Northhampton County Court

 

Between PUMPKINPIPS Case Number ###

 

and

Link to post
Share on other sites

SORRY - typo

 

MCOL cont.

 

Without Hearing

 

It is Ordered That -

 

1 The filing of an allocation questionaire be dispensed with in this case unless the District Judge at the court of Transfer orders otherwise. **

 

Note: Any Party affected by this Order may under Rule 3.3(5) apply to have is set aside, varied or stayed. Such a party must apply under Rule 23.3 within 14 days of the service of this order.

 

** Please note that an allocation fee may be payable in this instance. Please contact the court of transfer for futher details.

 

Date order drawn 10/08/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Notice of Transfer of Proceedings

 

To all parties

 

A defense to this claim has been filed.

 

The Claim has been transfered to the court covering the area where the Claimant lives or carries on business.

 

Please read the accompanying documents carefully.

 

All further communication should be addressed to :

 

The Court Manager

Croydon County Court

The Law Courts

Croydon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welshcakes

 

To answer your question, once I had filed a claim on MCOL I did not send documentation to any party. I was waiting to see what happened, but it would seem that Barclays had moved very quickly on this one and here I am.

 

Preparation of Bundle underway, but do I need to send anything ahead of it?

 

Pumkinpips

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...