Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Appreciate your response BankFodder. I am aware that the Consumer Rights Act does not apply in my case as I operate a business and, instead, should rely on the Supply of Goods and Services Act and Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977. I was a little unsure as, when I read the judgement of Hashim Farooq v EVRi Parcelnet, July 2023 I presumed that,  as Farooq had supplied laptops through Amazon,  the Consumer Rights Act would not apply but the judge refers to it in Section 22 as to why the claimant should be given judgment. Have I read this correctly? The reason for not offering full reimbursement was because I did not take out insurance for the full value.  In regards to correspondence from my customer,  I have emails from her in my timeline stating that she was waiting all week and that no one attempted delivery.  I have no doubt that she will be willing to corroborate the events with a written statement.
    • When you post information here you will have to post it in single file multipage PDF format. Follow the upload link. However, it would be more helpful if you could simply answer the questions that we have put to you and we can deal with paperwork afterwards if we think we need it.  
    • I was trying to post all the paperwork that I have, namely facebook ad, messages between the seller and my son etc . But I'm getting the message that the files are to large. 
    • First of all please can you tell us the name of the seller, something about the van – age/year, mileage, price paid. How far away is the seller from where your son lives? Who do you take it to for this inspection? Are they prepared to give you a written list of the things that they found? This is very important and you may well have to get an independent inspection from somebody such as the AA. This will cost you some kind of feedback we expect that we will be able to help you get it back. I would say that if you have to bring a court claim – which is likely – then your chances of success are better than 95% but the difficulty might be enforcing the judgement against the seller. We will have to no more in order to give you better advice. Does it have an MOT? What is the date of it and who gave it the MOT? I suggest that you start taking pictures of all of the defects that you can find.   Also I am going to say that I believe that you came over from Facebook where you were already informed that we would need at least all of the information which I have requested above. It will save a lot of time and effort for everybody if you can simply come up with the things that we ask without too much delay
    • My autistic son brought a van from a private seller. ( there was 5 other cars on his drive and another van, plus loads of machanic tools in his hallway,  so he probably is a unofficial dealer).  He gave the van a once over, he checked for any warning lights that might be on, there was none. He checked underneath for any rust etc, it all looked fine. The body was rough, but you'd expect that for the age of the van.  He got his brothers machanic to give it a pre mot check, as the van was old so he expected it to have a few problems. The van is a deathtrap, the seller had blacked out all the warning lights that were on the dash,  and I mean all.  He had also painted some kind of black stuff on the underside, to hide all the damage there.   My son drove it for over 2 hours to get it home. The machanic said he's surprised my son is still alive, and an untrained eye would not of seen what the seller had done.  Iv asked the seller for a refund and for him to have the van back, but he is refusing. Is there anything we can do.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

From Halifax regarding OFT test case


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6112 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hmmm just read the article ,, not impressed so if court judge asks for defence they can get a stay even if You put claim in b4 announcement ,, this is rediculouse and im really peeved off now ,, when my court told me business as usual thought maybe there was hope but now ???? is waiting game i guess :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thing is, Lloyds HSBC Halifax and Natewest have exactly the same statement, WORD FOR WORD.

 

It seems to be they are trying to influence what the courts will do.

 

Can I make a court claim for a refund during the test case?

Yes, but

 

They word it so as to insinuate that they will get the stay automatically.

 

Alot of work has gone on behind the scenes with the banks.

Whatever I post is my opinion and should be taken as such, an opinion. While it is what I believe and is offered in good faith, it should not be taken as a statement of truth

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope someone on here still decides to try and take The BOS to court and the court allows it to go ahead and they win.

 

It would be good because then everyone else would continue.

 

They say it's going to be a year........the dirty b**tards ! Not happy at all with this. :-x :-x :-x :-x :-x :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

hee hee i got my court papers back today Money help :) so maybe will find out soon enough i got to wait til 13 August for halifax to reply so will see then i guess :)

 

Great news DK - you're on your way, not long now ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

success :)

 

just received letter from halifax today offering me £3078 approx half what i was demanding yippeeeeeee.

only thing is i cant haggle now cos there is no-one there to haggle with anymore.

A helpful soul (who sounded really p**sed off) sid that i could "accept offer without prejudice" and claim remainder after court case.

 

the question:

 

has anyone seen or used a template letter that incorporates this sentence, and if so, where is it

 

any help would be gratefully received

 

dale

:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D (can you tell im happy??)

Link to post
Share on other sites

congrats to you well done :) keep going for rest though :)

thank you very much deadlykiss :p was panicking tho, bank said letter had been sent out last wednesday and couldnt tell me what the contents of the letter was ( said it was favourable) but didnt turn up till this morn, couldnt sleep all w/end.

 

just feel sorry for all the others nearly there but now so far

 

If any has seen a letter template with this quote in it please let me know

 

dale

:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi

If your going to miss 'p*****g them off' at Halifax, you could help me :roll::) . I got the standard letter sent last week stating that the partial offer made in March 2007 was in 'full & final' settlement and nothing can be clamed afterwards so I need to accept this or reject it by 7/10/07 otherwsie my case will not be resolved until after the Test Case (MCOL claim made about week before test case announcement). I rejected this again especially as I had Tax credits paid into my bank account (was working 18 hours a week and single parent at the time) during a large amount of the 6 years. Their offer was £645 which is one years charges so only a fraction. Got their defence which appears to be a standard one which also stated in the last paragraph that £39 is the ACTUAL COST of sending a letter (I am sure read that the standard cost that OFT stated for these letters was £5 as they are computer-generated).

Do yo think I need to send my Court Bundle or wait until I hear from the court ? Has ayone had any experience of Optima Solicitors, there based in Bradford?

thanks

Reeta

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 1rnold

 

Im fairly sure you should wait for word off the Court before you send anything in. Have you had a Allocation Questionaire yet from the Court. I think this needs to be filled in first before the bundle is sent,(some courts are doing away with the AQ) .

Not 100% so if Im wrong will somebody please correct me and I appologise now just in case I am.:)

30-12-2006--Requested statements from Local Halifax.

02-02-2007--Statements Recieved.

18-04-2007--Prelim sent.

20-04-2007--Reply , Thanks , give us 8wks letter.

02-0502007--Sent L.B.A. & Schedule of Charges

11-05-2007--Recieved reply ,still investigating.

17-05-2007--Sent Amended L.B.A. for Contractual Interest this time.

14-06-2007--Received standard Bog Off letter.

13-06-2007--Took N1 to Local Courts.

26-06-2007--Copy of N1 from Court, issued 21-06-2007. to Halifax, Deemed Served 25-06-2007

Have till 09-07-2007 to file Defence.

05-07-2007--Note that Acknowledgment of Service been Filed on 29-06-2007.

Have 28 days from date of Service to File Defence.

07-07-2007--Offer from Halifax.

09-07-2007--Rejection letter sent to Halifax. Next day delivery.

10-07-2007--Money put in Account:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Overflow

I haven't had the allocation questionaire yet or heard anything from the court yet. It makes me so angry that they think they have not done anything wrong especially as I was on Tax Credits as well. I hope this Test Case goes all wrong for them all as they have got high hopes its all win win win...:mad::(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...