Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well, it's good that you have five days before you're supposed to go there, there is time enough to sort things out.  See if Booking.com rear their head tomorrow.
    • It is an interesting Final Notice. Firstly because there is usually a reminder Notice before the final Notice. Secondly because it contains some of the wording that should be in the original PCN [aka Notice to keeper]. It could be that the necessary wording in the NTK is missing so they put it in the Reminder Notice to cover their error. If they have it hasn't worked. But the only wat we will know if you post up the back page of the Notice to keeper along with the other details asked for on Post 8 .  If they have got it wrong it means that they are unable to transfer the liability to pay the PCN from the driver to the keeper . I take it that you are the keeper and not the hirer? And do you know how long you are supposed to stay in that car park? In the past I have found Sainsbury's pretty good at cancelling PCNs for their customers. Take both PCNs in to the store and point out if you are a regular customer and that the driver spent a lot of money in their store and see if they could please do something with the ticket for you. if the manager can't help, then come back and we will give you their Head office and write to them. It is the easiest and quickest way to get the ticket cancelled. No point in appealing since that would mean they lose the chance to make any money out of you which is their whole reason for running the car park. If you cannot get Sainsbury to cancel then we rely on ECP getting things wrong so that you don't have to pay  on a technicality or technicalities. For example if the PCN does not comply with the Act and the keeper is not then liable it makes it difficult for ECP to win should it go to court as so many people are legally able to drive your car and Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Which is why we do need to see the questionnaire filled in and the rest of the NTK. Also it would be helpful to get photos of the signs in the car park. Ones that can be read by us, and the sign at the entrance as well as the inside ones especially those that are worded differently. Poor signage is another defence that works well and you will  need a good defence should they decide to go to Court.
    • Thanks for answer ref address/bank. Thought it wise to double-check.   When I reply to them as per post #5, what should my reason for dispute be?   " dispute this debt because..recommended reason as advised from your thread and add the debt purchaser has yet to provide any or all of the required documentation."
    • Alternative is to access the video yourself, upload to YouTube or similar and link back here.  Video will be accessible once you input your details into Wandsworth website: https://parking.wandsworth.gov.uk/pcn  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Syd83 V's Natwest


Syd83
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6044 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

I am new to all of this although I have been on this site a short while doing the ground work. Just to introduce myself, I am trying to reclaim bank charges on behalf of my boyfriend as we seem to have had millions of charges throughout the last year. I checked the last 6 months worth of statements available online and found that in the last 6 months we have been charged roughly £350!! As we are doing everything we can to get our bills paid off and save a deposit for a house, I feel that this money would be better off in our pockets than the banks and judging by some of the success stories it appears that we could get quite a substantial amount!

 

I have collated all the information it appears I need for the time being and feel ready to send off the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) tomorrow. I want it to reach NatWest before the postal strikes that are due as of Thursday.

 

I just want to check the address, I found one address whilst looking around the site but then found another on the Data Commissioners Site, could someone confirm if the following address is the correct one to send the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) too:

 

 

National Westminster Bank PLC

135 Bishopgate

London

EC2M 3UR

 

Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Syd, welcome on board the nat west forum!

 

The correct address to send the S.A.R - is this one:

 

Retail Regulatory Risk

2nd Floor

Cornerstone

60 South Gyle Crescent

Edinburgh

EH12 9WF

 

Also, whilst you're waiting for your information to arrive - have a good read through here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/105227-nat-west-claimants-new.html along with other threads on the nat west forum so that you gain as much knowledge as possible on the reclaiming process.

 

Best of luck, and just post back on here if you have any queries.......... or if you just want some moral support! :)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats great, thanks, so the correct address is:

 

Retail Regulatory Risk

2nd Floor

Cornerstone

60 South Gyle Crescent

Edinburgh

ED12 9WF

 

Its typical, that was the address I originally had before reading that I should use the address listed on the Data Commissioners site! Thanks for clearing that one up!

 

Will get that sent off tomorrow and keep you posted on what happens from there onwards :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi everyone, well have a gues why i was late sending this off... You've probably got it in one; Charges on our account had put us overdrawn so there were insufficient funds to be able to write a cheque.

 

Luckily i got paid yesterday so the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) went off yesterday by recorded delivery to the address listed above with a £10 cheque enclosed.

 

Unfortunately it has now come to light about the Office of Fair Trading taking the banks to court. So where i stand now i really don't know. Will i still receive the statements? I should have thought they still have to send them out?

 

Once i have totalled all the charges i guess its just a case of waiting for a result on the test case and adding on the charges that are added to the account from that point on.

 

Lets hope we get a result soon... we could really do with the money to pay off some of the bills that have been left unpaid due to these charges :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Continue with your claim as normal. Once the statements arrive, send them the prelim, then the LBA, then file N1 at your local county court. You need to ensure that you proceed with your claim regardless of the OFT announcement - have a read of zootscoots sticky for further clarification.

  • Haha 1

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just to keep you all updated, we received the statements yesterday and i have brought them to work today, photocopied them and have just gone through the copies highlighting all the transactions labelled "Charges"

 

There seem to be loads. I have highlighted all of them so of course i need to go through and check which ones we can claim and which ones are Advantage Gold Fees.

 

For those of you following this and needing advice you can find the details of what you can claim here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/79547-natwest-charges-guide.html

 

I will let you know once i have been through them and totalled up the amounts we can claim back :)

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right just been through all the statements and the grand total is £2601.00

 

Not as much as some people on here, but still a large amount!

 

Will now prepare the prelim and get that send in the next couple of days.

 

For anyone reading this for advise, things i struggled on were:

 

Charges Refund UDD £15

This is a "gesture of goodwill" made by the bank paying back half of the Unpaid D/D charge taken the previous day

 

Charges for odd amounts such as £20, £29, £38 and £40... these are due to charge increases and also due to the bank adding charges together, if its done to confuse you, it works! As long as you have a clear idea in your head of what charges cost what and when they increase you should be fine!

 

I strongly suggest reading:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/79547-natwest-charges-guide.html

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/27521-advantage-gold-unarranged-borrowing.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right... Ive just realised that not only are there the charges but there is also interest in the withdrawal column. I now understand i need to calculate that too. Doh!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't reclaim the entire amount of overdraft interest - only the portion that's applied to your account due to charges sending you overdrawn/over your overdraft. It's easy to calculate if you don't have an authorised overdraft as you just reclaim the lot! If you do have an authorised overdraft though, download the correct spreadsheet to input charges and interest into. :)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right I have completed the simple and complex schedule of charges and from reading through this: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/105227-nat-west-claimants-new.html I understand that i should now be sending off my schedule of charges along with my preliminary approach for repayment.

 

From reading bits here and there on the forum i gather its best to send off the complex schedule of charges and am i correct in saying that i should ommit the interest column?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that i should now be sending off my schedule of charges along with my preliminary approach for repayment.

 

Yes.

 

From reading bits here and there on the forum i gather its best to send off the complex schedule of charges

 

If you're reclaiming overdraft interest - yes.

 

and am i correct in saying that i should ommit the interest column?

 

Yes again!

 

Best of luck Syd - keep us posted ;)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Hedgy, thats great, after looking through again I am a bit confused which column to take out, on the first page its just notes, on the second page there are headings:

 

DATE PENALTY APPLIED

DETAIL OF PENALTY

PENALTY CHARGED

CUMULATIVE PENALTIES CHARGED

INTEREST DATE

INTEREST CHARGED

ACCOUNT BALANCE AT INTEREST DATE

INTEREST FREE OVERDRAFT (ENTER AS +)

INTEREST ON PENALTIES

 

...and on the third page it is all about the 8% interest. So i guess that is narrowed down to page 2!

 

Do i need to take out any of the above columns and also i have an AG account but am unsure of whether i get an interest free overdraft. It doesnt appear so as i get charged interest everytime i am in the black.

 

What is the very last column - "Interest on penalties"? I dont understand what the figures are ment to be and how it is calculated.

 

Thanks for all your help

 

Syd :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Syd

Have just replied to your other thread on default removal and I would suggest including "Removal of Default and all adverse maker data from my credit file" in your claim against NatWest (are you preparing your LBA now?), as well as using the method I mention in your other thread. Basically, you are keeping everything together and have more chance of getting the default removed if you include it in your claim against the bank.

Painty x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Syd - when it comes to the complex spreadsheet, I'm definitely not the gal for the job! About all I can tell you is that you need to hide the 8% interest column until you file at court. Hopefully, somebody else will be able to advise you fully on the spreadsheet Q. Best of luck :)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Syd

 

Me again ... I have a spready in Excel which I can email to you. It is simple to use; all you need to do is change the rate of interest and enter you charges and charge dates and it will work out the rate of interest for you on each charge. I've used it successfully so far with one credit card company and am using it with NatWest and B/card.

If you want me to send it please click on my instant messenger icon underneath my avatar and its yours :D

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

When they sent through the statements, nothing was showing as far as any notes that have been made, any agreements for his loan, any details of his setting up of Advantage Gold.

 

Should this of been included in the package that the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) requests. We are beginning to feel that they do not actually have the agreement for his loan!

 

EDIT: Also ment to ask, what is the address to send the schedule of charges to? Would it be the same as the one above for SAR request?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

When you send a full SAR to Nat West, you're basically requesting all informtion that they hold on you - and this includes loan agreements, notes, etc.

 

If you want the additional information and they haven't complied with your request, send them one of the non-compliance (data protection) letters from the templates library and state specifically which information you're still waiting for. ;)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

During my term of unemployment i was unable to meet the payments on my loan. I informed the bank that once i began my new job i would pay these back and due to the fact that they are completely useless, by the time they had decided to do anything about the arrears i had begun the job. Once i got paid i went to the bank in the city centre and made an agreement witha young girl there that i would pay £100 there and then followed by monthly payments of £400 plus the £218.25 until the arrears were cleared. They took the £100 but then i got loads of text messages asking me to call them. After numerous phone calls and trips to the bank i discovered that there were no notes of our visit to the bank on my records and that there was no way that she could have made an agreement like that as it is the lending centre that deal with it.

 

After more text messages asking me to ring them i finally got through to Jessica who said that the first agreement wouldnt have been accepted because the arrears have to be paid in full so we made an agreement that she would increase my overdraft to cover the arrears and on the first of each month my overdraft would decrease by £250 until it reaches £500.

 

We had a copy of this agreement through the post along with the terms and conditions and assumed that they would reinstate the direct debit to cover the monthly payments as we had asked her to do.

 

I checked my bank yesterday and found that my overdraft had dissapeared then i got another text message to call them, so did and asked them to call me back - the kind woman said she would in two minutes and took my mobile number.... half an hour later we got fed up of waiting and rang them back. We spoke to Daniel who confirmed that the overdraft had been reduced to the usual £500 as the original agreement wasnt kept too as i had missed the payment on my loan this month and also that it did not incorporate any charges or interest. I tried to inform them that there was no mention of anything he said in the terms and conditions of the agreement, that i had asked Jessica to reinstate the direct debit as part of the agreement and that if one of his colleagues has made an agreement they should honour this... He proceeded to talk utter rubbish which completely confused me and i asked to speak to a manager (He asked me what the problem was!!!)

 

After being on hold for another 10 mins we got back to him who said he couldnt get through to a manager and that he could reinstate my overdraft but not to £1750, it would have to be £1800 and something to cover all charges and interest. He said he would do that now and also remove the £28 charge for being over my overdraft (as that was their fault) and would send a new agreement out in the post.

 

Where do i stand, could i take them to small claims court? If so how would i go about this... we have not had a copy of the original agreement when we sent of the SAR and will be sending the next letter through shortly.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...