Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

British Gas - Taken back incentive payment


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6079 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I signed up to British Gas In September last year after one of their salesmen knocked on the door.

 

I signed up afetr he told me that by joining them for both Gas and Electricity, I would get a £53 credit on my Gas statement as a thank you for signing up. This was confirmed on a leaflet he gave to me.

 

I wasn't sure as they were the highest priced suppliers, but the salesman said, just switch over until the credit is due, gt it on your statement and then switch to someone else.

 

So I took the plunge and switched. The transfer took place on the 3rd November for gas, and the 7th November for Electric.

 

When I got my bill after 3 months there was no credit on there, so I caled them up. They explained it would be on the next bill issued and that if I gave him the correct meter readings for both gas and electricity, they would send out the new bill which would include the £53.

 

This they duly did, then a week later I requested a transfer to another supplier (via the comparison site)

 

The transfer of Electric wen through on the 26th March, and the Gas changed over on the 17th April.

 

I've just had my final gas bil from British Gas and they have taken the £53 credit off me and are requesting it back.

 

Is this right, can they do this. The leaflet I have does not mention having to be with them for 12 months etc, only that I should have both gas and electric supplied to the property at the time of the credit being issued, which is correct, I did have both gas and electric supplied at the time the credit was issued.

 

On 17th May I sent this.

 

I write in reference to the Final gas bill you sent to me dated 26 April 2007 (photocopy enclosed).

 

As you can see from the copy enclosed I have highlighted one of the entries, specifically, an adjustment of £53 which was made on the 23 March 2007.

 

This £53 I presume is the 1 months free gas I was given for signing up to yourselves back in September 2006. Enclosed is a copy of the leaflet I was given on the day I signed up to British Gas. On the reverse side you can see note 1 clearly defines the conditions regarding the credit.

 

I see no reason for this amount to be debited back from my account as I have adhered to the conditions for payment.

 

I require a full explanation of this within the next 14 days, until this situation is resolved I advise that this account is in dispute and no further payment will be made to the account.

 

Yours faithfully

 

This was received by BG on 19th May- recorded delivery.

 

Today i received this, no other correspondence since 17th May other than this.

 

Mr Dori2o

 

We have been instructed by British Gas Trading to recover an overdue debt, in the sum of 121.94 on their behalf

 

Our clients have informed us that they are unaware of any legitimate reason for non-payment of their account and although they would prefer an amicable settlement, will not hesitate to commence legal proceedings if necessary.

 

Please call our 24 hour payment line immediately on 08717001841 to make payment by credit or debit card. Payment is also accepted ionline at buchanan clark + wells online payments. Alteritave methods of payment are detailed overleaf.

 

Should there be any matter that you would like to bring to our attention or if you wish to discuss your financial circumstances in relation to the debt, please call us immediately.

 

Yours

 

Buchanan Clark & Wells.

 

I have phoned them today, and advised that I sent the dispute letter, they said it was not their problem and they will collect the money.

 

I am now going to send this letter.

 

I refer to your letter dated 12 July 2007. Your clients, British Gas Trading, are aware that this matter is in dispute, and your involvement is therefore a breach of the Office of Fair Trading Guidelines on Debt Collection.

 

Physical/psychological harassment

 

 

s. 2.5 Putting Pressure on debtors or third parties is considered to be oppressive

 

s. 2.6 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

 

(d) not ensuring that an adequate history of the debt is passed on as

appropriate resulting in repetitive and/or frequent contact by different

parties

(e) not informing the debtor when their case has been passed on to a

different debt collector

(h) ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are

disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment

 

 

 

 

 

Deceptive and/or unfair methods

 

 

s. 2.7 Dealings with debtors are not to be deceitful and/or unfair

 

s. 2.8 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

 

(i) failing to investigate and/or provide details as appropriate, when a debt is

queried or disputed, possibly resulting in debtors being wrongly pursued

(k) not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or

disputed debt.

 

 

I am therefore unable to assist you, and will not enter into further correspondence with you.

 

If you contact me again, other than to confirm that you understand and will comply with your obligations under the OFT guidelines by passing this account back to your client, I shall construe such contact as harassment and act accordingly. This will include reports to the police, Information Commissioners Office, Trading Standards and the OFT.

 

A copy of this letter has been sent to British Gas Trading.

Yours faithfully

 

 

And will send this letter to BG

 

I write in reference to the letter I have received from Buchanan Clark + Wells, who I am advised have been instructed by yourselves to collect the disputed amount that is owed on my account.

 

You are fully aware that this account is in dispute and by continuing to try and collect this amount without trying to resolve the dispute, you are in breach of the OFT’s guidelines on debt collection.

 

I made it perfectly clear in my notice of dispute that no monies would be paid to this account until the dispute had been resolved.

 

As you have taken no steps to try and resolve this matter, no payment will be forthcoming at this moment.

 

Yours faithfully.

 

Can anyone help any further?

GE Money S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued 21/11/06. Responded 01/12/06. Prelim sent 05/12/06 £406. Response 12/12/06- **SETTLED IN FULL** (£396)

HSBC S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued 05/12/06. NO charges in last 6 years.

Lowell CCA issued 21/11/06. Further reminder sent 8/12/06. Now commited criminal offence no response.

Capital One S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 08/12/06 Responded 03/01/07-Prelim Sent 16/01/07. LBA issued 06/02/07- N1 served 07/03/07- acknowledged 14/03/07.

Scotcall CCA issued 16/01/07. Criminal offence committed.

HFC Prelim sent 16/01/07. LBA sent- Final Correspondance issued with time limit of 29/03/07.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contact the regulator.

I have found that these people start to take complaints very much more seriously when the regulator is involved

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK will do.

 

I'm still going to send BG the above letter, but I only have the address that is on the bills which is

 

House Contact Centre

PO Box 50

Leeds

LS1 1LE

 

Can anyone confirm another address I should use?

GE Money S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued 21/11/06. Responded 01/12/06. Prelim sent 05/12/06 £406. Response 12/12/06- **SETTLED IN FULL** (£396)

HSBC S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued 05/12/06. NO charges in last 6 years.

Lowell CCA issued 21/11/06. Further reminder sent 8/12/06. Now commited criminal offence no response.

Capital One S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 08/12/06 Responded 03/01/07-Prelim Sent 16/01/07. LBA issued 06/02/07- N1 served 07/03/07- acknowledged 14/03/07.

Scotcall CCA issued 16/01/07. Criminal offence committed.

HFC Prelim sent 16/01/07. LBA sent- Final Correspondance issued with time limit of 29/03/07.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would recommend sending them a cheque for what you owe them (actually owe them ie less the £53), along with a letter of complaint, address to their Customer Relations Team, British Gas Trading, Admail AA3119, Southampton, SO14 0NU. If you don't receive a satisfactory response within 14 days, take bankfodder's advice and go to either energywatch or the energy ombudsman.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Took the advice off here.

 

I have paid BG the balance of the account less the £53.

 

I have written to The Energy Ombusdman.

 

Tonight I got a call at 16:26 from Buchanan Clark and Wells

 

Here's how the conversation went.

 

- Hello

 

- Is that Mr Dori2o

 

-Yes, can I ask who this is

 

-This is Buchanan Clark and Wells, can you confirm your address for me please.

 

- No, I cannot

 

-Why?

 

_I don't know you are who you say you are.

 

- You have spoken to us on many occasion.

 

- I beg your pardon, I have not. I have spoken to you once when I called you, and I have written to you.

 

- So you do know who we are

 

- I cannot confirm that you are who you say you are.

 

-Mr Dori2o, we need to discuss when you are going to pay this amount.

 

- I'm not talking about it over the phone, if you want to correspond with me you will have to write.

 

- No we'll just call back later.

 

Then he put the phone down.

 

I hope they call back, it's quite fun letting them get all wound up.

 

They have received the letter I sent as I sent it recorded, but obviously they don't seem to care.

 

Or could it be they are so thick, they don't understand?

 

Just about to send them the template that tells them to write to me only.

 

Any other advice would be helpfull.

GE Money S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued 21/11/06. Responded 01/12/06. Prelim sent 05/12/06 £406. Response 12/12/06- **SETTLED IN FULL** (£396)

HSBC S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued 05/12/06. NO charges in last 6 years.

Lowell CCA issued 21/11/06. Further reminder sent 8/12/06. Now commited criminal offence no response.

Capital One S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 08/12/06 Responded 03/01/07-Prelim Sent 16/01/07. LBA issued 06/02/07- N1 served 07/03/07- acknowledged 14/03/07.

Scotcall CCA issued 16/01/07. Criminal offence committed.

HFC Prelim sent 16/01/07. LBA sent- Final Correspondance issued with time limit of 29/03/07.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I've had a letter and a Litigation letter from Buchanan Clarke and wells today.

 

They state that they have contected their clkient, BG Trading and they have advised that they have not received and letter of complaint from me, and know nothing about the dispute.

 

They state in there Intended Litigation letter that they feel this matter is closed and if I do not pay the outstanding bal;ance they will proceed with a CC claim.

 

I have proof that BG have received both the leter I sent to them.One was to BG Trading and one went to House Contact Centre, where I was advised to send the letter to.

 

Both were sent recorded and both have been signed for.

 

I'm tempted to let them take nme to court and show the judge the evidence that they have broken the OFT guyideleines, and have not dealt with the dispute at all.

GE Money S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued 21/11/06. Responded 01/12/06. Prelim sent 05/12/06 £406. Response 12/12/06- **SETTLED IN FULL** (£396)

HSBC S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued 05/12/06. NO charges in last 6 years.

Lowell CCA issued 21/11/06. Further reminder sent 8/12/06. Now commited criminal offence no response.

Capital One S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 08/12/06 Responded 03/01/07-Prelim Sent 16/01/07. LBA issued 06/02/07- N1 served 07/03/07- acknowledged 14/03/07.

Scotcall CCA issued 16/01/07. Criminal offence committed.

HFC Prelim sent 16/01/07. LBA sent- Final Correspondance issued with time limit of 29/03/07.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bump

 

Anyone have any suggestions?

GE Money S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued 21/11/06. Responded 01/12/06. Prelim sent 05/12/06 £406. Response 12/12/06- **SETTLED IN FULL** (£396)

HSBC S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued 05/12/06. NO charges in last 6 years.

Lowell CCA issued 21/11/06. Further reminder sent 8/12/06. Now commited criminal offence no response.

Capital One S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 08/12/06 Responded 03/01/07-Prelim Sent 16/01/07. LBA issued 06/02/07- N1 served 07/03/07- acknowledged 14/03/07.

Scotcall CCA issued 16/01/07. Criminal offence committed.

HFC Prelim sent 16/01/07. LBA sent- Final Correspondance issued with time limit of 29/03/07.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would write to BG using registered mail to confirm that

 

1. the account is in dispute

2. you have paid the bill less the amount in dispute

3. you have complained about their handling of the case including the use of a dca

4. that they are responsible for the conduct and harassment carried out by their dca

5. that you will require compensation for the actions of bg & dcas when this is resolved

6. that any legal action will be contested and a counterclaim entered

7. that you require them to actually look at the situation and resolve it

 

keep a copy of the letter

 

 

Grumpy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...