Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lloyds court dates


GaryH
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6080 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi everyone, good luck to those who are due in court soon and well done to those who still got money.

I have a bit of a dilemma. 2 weeks ago I sent off my bundle to the court and to SCM. Have heard nothing from either since then. My case is on Sept 7th at Slough County Court. I have been on holiday and only came back yesterday. I have seen a template of a witness statement on the site.

Obviously I have passed the 14 day cut off date for document presentation.

Have I messed up? I have all the other documents that have been recommended.

Has anyone else had a case at Slough recently? How did it go?

What should I read, if anything into the silence from the court and SCM?

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

JSS I am in Reading Court next Fri as well. SCM have no update from Lloyds as to defend or not in court and the clock is ticking. they missed their bundle deadline,

 

i suspect they will (pardon the pun) bank on getting a Stay out of the hearing rather than look empty handed. you need to go in armed with reasons why they shouldnt stay, i.e. they forced you to take court action as they never replied, they havent sent a statement in and will turn up in court empty handed on the off chance of stay. if you can show them up (not in a smug way) it should go well for you.

Halifax WON X 2, Northern Rock WON, Capital One WON, Marbles WON, HSBC WON

On the 25th october I will be filing a claim for £175.00 Citicards. Just watch it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

JSS. I am no expert but I am sure that if either party (you or Lloyds TSB) do not carry out the instructions of the court order, such as file certain items, documents etc by the time scale set out in the order. The court will find against the party who failed to abide by the instructions of the order.

Make sure you do everthing you are supposed to do and turn up at court, tell the other side nothing until you get into the court, do not agree to a stay, and make sure you can prove that your documents were sent with recorded delivery & proof of delivery paperwork etc. If you are pretty sure the other side have not filed papers or whatever on time tell the judge when you get chance to speak. I won on this basis, see my post above, hope it helps, good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

JSS i am assuming you have received a letter from SCM like i did tonight asking the judge again for a stay. the arguments are long winded (i didnt read it, just hunted for the cheque :-( ) now i am livid and fear my request will take 5 days to get to the judge whilst the court agrees to the solicitors

Halifax WON X 2, Northern Rock WON, Capital One WON, Marbles WON, HSBC WON

On the 25th october I will be filing a claim for £175.00 Citicards. Just watch it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pantheman. Congratulations on your success. I think you did brilliantly! You must feel great winning against the 'big boys' especially when they were represented by an arrogant bully who is obviously not used to losing. It is a pity that you were unable to let the judge know the unprofessional remarks made against him. I also fail to see how the barrister thought that that was going to help his case/intimidation!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Due at Slough County Court on 7th Sept.

Just received a letter from SCM this morning. The gist is that they have written to the court asking for a stay (they have enclosed a copy of the letter to the court). Included are the details of the impending OFT case.

 

The last 2 paragraphs read

"We are sending a copy of this letter to the claimmant and will be seeking his/her agremeent to the stay . In view of the very short time before the designated hearing ( a result of recent developments) it may not have been possible to obtain that. Unless the court grants a stay of its own motion before the hearing date (which we respectfully request), our client intends to be represented by counsel who will be able to assist the court in any way they can.

Bearing in mind the impending hearing date, we would be most grateful if you could communicate the courts response to us.

 

Some questions:

Is the court going to let me know whether there is going to be a stay?

If I hear nothing do I go to court anyway on the off chance that there will be a case or to be told that a stay has been granted?

Is it just a bluff by SCM that if the case goes ahead they will be represented? Given that they know as much as me as to whether there will or won't be a stay given the short time scale available will they even have enough time to arrange one?

This is the only communication I have had from SCM since they sent me the standard defence in June. I have no idea whether they have sent the court their bundle. They haven't sent me anything.

I cannot contact the court as their number seems to be unobtainable. So it is just a case of turning up and a case of wait and see.

This uncertainty is a little unsettling.

Any advice or similar experiences would be appreciated.

Thanks

JSS :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

JSS, SC@M do not decide when you go to court or if you have a stay, if you have your court date you MUST attend with ALL of your documents ready for the hearing, do not allow them access to your files/documents at the court, they have been turning up to apply for a stay at courts and not prepared for hearing and have been treat accordingly by most D.Js.Remember when you go to court YOU must be fully prepared for the HEARING. IF you receive notification from the court of a stay before the hearing date, you must look at the many postings for the appropriate action,eg, Take a letter to the court objecting to stay(no fee) or look at the thread STAYS info and guidance. Remember SC@M do not represent YOU!!! ;) ;) :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys

 

I want to make sure I put in everything spot on, that has been set out in the Witness statement which is linked at the beginning of the Thread.

 

Point 50 of the witness statement goes:-

 

"50. The Competition Commission Report

 

Northern Ireland Competition Commission report from October 2006 [exhibit ***] revealed that figures contributed by eight banks, including the Defendant, Abbey Plc, showed that around 12% of the banks...."

I've looked in the advance bundle but can't seem to find a link to this report. Does anyone know where I can find this and post a link to it please?

Also

I'm having trouble finding Charges leaflet in the Lloyds TSB section of the T&C's library which is needed for , point 12 of the witness statement (the Contract terms section)

vi) From the Defendant’s current published Charges leaflet [exhibit ***] which forms part of the Terms of the Account;

“If you go overdrawn without agreeing this with us we Charge a higher rate of interest for unauthorised borrowing …We will also Charge you a fee for any unauthorised borrowing….

 

If anybody knows where this is, would also be really grateful, pretty much have everything else printed and ready to submit as a bundle and would really like to be a thorough and get every exhibit in

 

thanks in advance:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

JSS, SC@M do not decide when you go to court or if you have a stay, if you have your court date you MUST attend with ALL of your documents ready for the hearing, do not allow them access to your files/documents at the court, they have been turning up to apply for a stay at courts and not prepared for hearing and have been treat accordingly by most D.Js.Remember when you go to court YOU must be fully prepared for the HEARING. IF you receive notification from the court of a stay before the hearing date, you must look at the many postings for the appropriate action,eg, Take a letter to the court objecting to stay(no fee) or look at the thread STAYS info and guidance. Remember SC@M do not represent YOU!!! ;) ;) :D

Indeed.:)

Hi guys

 

I want to make sure I put in everything spot on, that has been set out in the Witness statement which is linked at the beginning of the Thread.

 

Point 50 of the witness statement goes:-

 

"50. The Competition Commission Report

 

Northern Ireland Competition Commission report from October 2006 [exhibit ***] revealed that figures contributed by eight banks, including the Defendant, Abbey Plc, showed that around 12% of the banks...."

 

I've looked in the advance bundle but can't seem to find a link to this report. Does anyone know where I can find this and post a link to it please?

 

Also

 

I'm having trouble finding Charges leaflet in the Lloyds TSB section of the T&C's library which is needed for , point 12 of the witness statement (the Contract terms section)

 

vi) From the Defendant’s current published Charges leaflet [exhibit ***] which forms part of the Terms of the Account;

“If you go overdrawn without agreeing this with us we Charge a higher rate of interest for unauthorised borrowing …We will also Charge you a fee for any unauthorised borrowing….

 

If anybody knows where this is, would also be really grateful, pretty much have everything else printed and ready to submit as a bundle and would really like to be a thorough and get every exhibit in

 

thanks in advance:)

It is actually in the advanced bundle, as exhibit xxx18. Here it is again though -

http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/inquiries/ref2005/banking/prov_find_app_4-6.pdf

http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/inquiries/ref2005/banking/prov_find_app_4-10.pdf

 

For the charges leaflet just print off the current tariff from Lloyds website.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No probs - good luck.:)

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7TH SEPT @ SLOUGH COUNTY COURT 2PM

All documents to be presented to the other party and the court 14 days prior, ie the 24th August. Nothing from SC@M before other than their standard defence.

On Saturday I received a letter from SC@M (dated Aug 30th) saying that they had asked the court for a stay. I have just sent a letter this morning to the court asking for the court to refuse the stay, as I believe it contravenes Article 6.1 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

Anyway the document bundles from both parties were due in on the 24th August. Was their letter asking for a stay technically a breach of the time limit? If so then would my letter to the court also be a breach of the time limit? Even with the mitigating circumstances?

If the court does not accept my letter then I will just have to try and argue the points in court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One of my son's received his letter from court today he was hoping it would be a date for the hearing but it was a stay until march 2008, TSB will love that.

:x if i have been off any help to you please click my scales

 

cases won

28th July Single Claim for bank charges against LTSB, £6,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement

 

18th July Joint Claime against LTSB £7,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a hearing date for 12th September at Stratford Upon Avon court. I understand the count will be staying the hearing despite a request from LloydsTSB. LTSB say they will be sending their counsel to attend the hearing. Can you help please? BesERCer

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you read the line where it says they will send some, they also mention that will do all they can to assist the court. i will ask whether this applies to filing documents into the court and accepting the initial judges decision to let the case proceed.

Halifax WON X 2, Northern Rock WON, Capital One WON, Marbles WON, HSBC WON

On the 25th october I will be filing a claim for £175.00 Citicards. Just watch it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...