Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Application for charging order? PLEASE HELP


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4257 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all. I really hope you can help me on this please. I got a letter from the Northampton County Court stating that.

 

On ** May 2007, District Judge ****** considered the application of the claimant ('the judgement creditor'), from which it appears:

 

a) a judgment or order given on ** March 2007 by the Northampton County Court in claim no. ********, ordered the defendant ('the judgment debtor') to pay money to the judgment creditor;

 

b)the amount now owing under the judgment or order is £6,994.28 (including any interest and costs); and

 

c) the judgment debtor is the owner of, or has a beneficial interest in the asset describedin the schedule below;

 

and the court orders that

 

1. The interest of the judgment debtor Mr **** *** in the asset described in the schedule below stand charged with payment of £6,994.28 together with any further interest becoming due and the costs of the application.

 

2. The application will be heard at 2:00 p.m on 28 June 2007 at **** County Court when a judge will decide whether the charge created by this order should continue (with or without modification) or should be discharged.

 

AND IT IS ORDERED THAT

 

The Judgement Creditor shall serve the judgment debtor, mortgagee(s), (CPR73.5)

 

The Schedule

 

The address of the land or property charged is *********** the title to which is registered a H.M Land Registry under Title No. ******

 

 

_____________________________________________________

 

PLEASE HELP. I've had this letter for about a month. This is the first I know about this charging order. I need to know:

 

1. Has the charging order already been made?

2. What is todays hearing for exactly?

3. Can I stop the charge against my property?

 

I hadn't heard about this debt for nearly 5 years until this. I asked for a settlement figure twice 5 years ago but they never got back to me. The car is still on the drive rotting away. I don't use it anymore.

 

PLEASE HELP. The hearing is today. I'm getting married next month and need my equity that's in my house and this will take most of it away. I'm running out of time. Please help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess is that in March they got a CCJ, in May they got an interim charging order and today they are going for a final charging order. Did you attend any of the court hearings?Why have you removed your February posting?

 

The CCJ will make it difficult for you to obtain another mortgage so you are less likely to be moving in the next 6 years at least. The equity is usually only released upon sale but you can come to some repayment arrangements before moving anywaywhich will release the charge.

 

I cannot see how you are going to be able to stop anything at this late stage but maybe some-one else has ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for your replies.

 

Well I can still get a 80% mortgage with the CCJ which is why i need the equity. I'm getting married in August and we're both selling up and with the equity getting a house together.

 

Yes I'm attending the hearing but didn't attend any of the others.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at these threads may help you.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/98642-charging-order-help-needed.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/99115-1st-credit.html

 

I'm really no expert on this stuff. I think what's done can be undone in theory though.

What sort of world do you want your kids to grow up in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rich,

 

You need to attend the hearing absolutely! You also need to come up with some really good reason(s) why you didn't attend previously. You didn't receive any correspondence perhaps??? You really need to look at having the CCJ set aside, on the basis of the agreement being faulty in some way. I realise you probably don't know if it is or not, but essentially you are trying rewind the situation to give yourself a chance to defend the claim. The big problem you have however, is that the Judge is going to want to know why you didn't respond to the claim. Ill health of someone very close in the family perhaps? Maybe you have been ill? I'm clutching at straws here.... I really wish you hadn't sat on this letter for a month! It's not exactly giving us enough time to sort out your strategy!:rolleyes:

 

You need to be able to account for your actions credibly, in not defending the case and not attending the hearing(s), so that the Judge will sympathise with you. What you are seeking based on the reasons you come up with is the CCJ set aside and the opportunity to defend the claim. You have really created some problems for yourself here in terms of the hurdles you are going to have to jump! Remember to refer to the District Judge as Sir at all times and make sure you when you are asking for him to do/or not do something, you ask in a deferential manner. Things like, "Respectfully Sir, I would like to ask for....." An adjournment wouldn't be a bad idea so that you can prepare, but again the Judge will ask why you're not prepared already seeing as you've had the letter since.....

 

This is not going to be easy at all, I just wish you hadn't left it! Best of luck later today!

 

Laiste.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your replies. You really are a great help. I do spend 5 nights a week in Leeds with my soon to be wife. Might this be a reason for not recieving the court letters?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be better if you say that you have been living with your fiance in Leeds and have returned infrequently to your address (during the period the CCJ, Crt letters, etc were sent). This explanation is only going to work if you don't have a job at the moment, so in effect your ties to the place where your property is, are not that strong, apart from the house.

 

The Judge may try to catch you out so if he asks how you pay all your bills you need to say by DD and SO. He may even ask who looks after your property, you should say a couple of friends keep an eye on the place. If asked why you haven't re-directed your mail/or got it sent to you, you might want to say you just hadn't got round to it, you have been pre-occupied with your relationship! Lets hope the young and in love (and a bit absent minded) gets you the sympathy vote!;) I can't obviously flesh out all the details for you, but you get the idea. Young and in love, abrogated your responsibilities, terribly sorry for the inconvenience etc...Lets hope the Judge is in a good mood!

 

It's hard to say if they will turn up, but I would advise getting there for 1.45pm. If they do turn up, their sol might want to have a brief chat with you. Of course, dress smartly to create a good impression.

 

You are going to have to say you have behaved foolishly in not checking your mail but that you have definitely learned your lesson. Contrition and acknowledging you have made a mistake will help you. I am going to keep my fingers crossed that it does enough to stop you getting the C/O.

 

Regards,

 

Laiste.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. I've just got back from the courts. The court was closed due to flood damage and all cases are adjourned. I will be recieving a new date in due course.

 

Does this give me enough time to scrape a case together to even get rid of the CCJ too?

 

Can I get rid of a CCJ once it's been posted or is the best I can hope for to stop the charging order?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's one bit of luck at any rate.

 

It is possible to get rid of a CCJ but you will usually have to come up with a pretty good reason for why you did not respond at the time and even then I think it can be hard if you cannot show that you have/had a reasonable chance of defending the action.

 

The experience of this forum should help you with the second part - in other words finding at least one element of the alleged debt (if not the whole thing) that is not enforceable however explaining why you didn't turn up may be harder.

 

The other way to get rid of the CCJ is to agree with the creditor to have the judgement set aside in return for settling the debt. They don't have to agree to that but I think most will if they see it as a way to get their money quickly with little fuss. Note my knowledge of the practice in that area is rather out of date so I would check with someone with more recent experience whether the courts still usually allow that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi, thanks for all your advice. Here's a little update for you. I've telephoned the solicitors that are dealing with the case on behalf of the creditor and tried to settle the matter without it going to court and getting a charging order. I offered £1000 pluss £100 per month and she said that they wasn't interestd and that it was still going to court.

 

I did ask the solicitor if I could have details of the creditors taking control of the debt (I think she called it a Deed of Assignment or something) and that she would let her clients know and they would get it in the post to me. What is this Deed of Assignment and what does it mean? Is it relevent? My case is on the 20th July, will I get in time?

 

I'm totally lost now again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...

Hi there, just to update this case, yes I know it's an old one but it's just bit me on my bum!

 

The case was adjourned due to the flooding all those years ago. I turned up, gave them my name to the court gentleman and after waiting till I was last the gentleman asked me my name and they saw the case without me, even though I was there. They said I could apply to have it reopened due to it being their fault but i never did anything about it. The plan was to come to some arrangement and pay it off but I thought they can have their £6,994 when I sell the house.

 

It's all just caught up with me. I've just received a call from Mortimer Clarke saying that it now stands at over £12,000 with interest of £57 going on every month.

 

Oh god I've got myself in a right old pickle here. All for a debt that is now 10 years old. Is there anything I can do? Is it too late to have it reopened due to the fact that it was the courts fault for not seeing the case with me present? Will they still even have this fact that it was their mistake from all those years ago? This is the 1st I've heard from them since 2007. Gutted

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...