Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • hahah except I can't locate the courier to frighten them with it hahaha   
    • Dx100uk according to the ICO office, who I spoke to at some length earlier today after getting the email from the court, Equita are the data controller if they have instructed the contracted EA. The ICO have noted the case, and stated very clearly that the court has the higher standing in terms of dealing with, and punishing either party if they fail to adhere to the district judges order and any action they take will not be criminal.    but they also stated very clearly that with what I’ve told them, and on the basis of accepting what I’ve told them as gospel (which it is with written confirmation from both the courts and the police) then there is some major red flags being raised on both sides with them blaming each other.    they’ve advised me to essentially keep my powder dry until there is a charging decision and an outcome from the seperate proceedings with the EAC2 complaint, and then come back to them with the case and they will be in a stronger position to act against Equita and the EA as there will be established facts and evidence that have already been laid before a court.     
    • urm.. i seem to recall another assault case whereby the approved bailiff company claimed the body camera was nor theirs but a pers one of the bailiff, i think they got in serious trouble for it. i believe that breaks certain gov't approval for a bailiff company/firm regulations/laws  if memory serves me right?
    • have a look at  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/451423-pra-letter-of-claim-old-barclaycard-debt/?do=findComment&comment=5256506 the docs in this thread are what you should get. if the agreement the correct date for signup and does the PRA or BC cover letter use the word reconstructed? dx
    • sounds like lesley. They'll respond some rubbish I'm sure.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Neofang2k Vs Natwest


neofang2k
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6149 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All, i'm in real need of some help.

 

i started the claim against the Natwest on 26/04/07, asking for my statements.

 

the bank responded by sending these to me. after i calculated the charges to a massive £4019.64 inc intrest i sent another letter to the bank asking for the money back.

 

i had no response so sent another letter asking again and threating them with court action.

 

still nothing, so now i decided to take it to a small claims court. the Bank decided to Acknowledge the claim which gave them another 14 days.

 

right at the last minute they have decided to defend the claim and i am waiting on a court date.

 

i'm getting a little scarred now and don't really want to lose and owe the bank any money. i have had a letter form there soloicitors as well but the letter makes no sense as they are using some very techincal words.

 

can someone please give me some advice on what to do? do i need to call the bank to try and work this out?

 

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - forget the bank - you are going to fight this in court unless they pay - they'll pay (right at the last minute).

 

Prep well for the fight. If you are prepared there is no worry.

 

Read all this http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/#libraries-bank-charges-materials

 

Your next step is this.. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/33060-basic-court-bundle.html

 

I've never got to this stage, but others have and will help you. Best of luck.

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all again, i have brought in the letter from the banks solictors. from what i can gather i need to get a response to them within 14 days. the letter is dated the 15th June. here is what is says

 

1 - This defence filed and served without prejudice tot he right of the defendant to apply for summary in respect of and/or to strike out the particulars of claim.

 

2 - If (which is denied) the claimant proves the allegation that the defendant debited charges tot eh claimant's back account, insofar as such charges were debited on the date or dates more than six years prior to the issue of this claim, any remedy in respect of the same, whether damages, restituation or otherwise, is barred by the operation of the Limitation act 1980 and/or the doctrine of laches and the defendant will apply to strike out this aspect of the claim and/or summary judgment

 

3 - The defendant is embarrassed by the lack of particularity pleaeded in the particulars of the claim to the extent that the particulars of the claim fail to disclose reasonable grounds for brining a cliam against the defendant. in particular of the claim do not disclose and legally recgnisable claim against the defendant.

 

4 - the defendant invites the claimant to remedy the above. in the event that the claimant fails to do so within 14 days of the service of the defence the the defedant will apply tot eh court for an order striking out the particulars of the claim

 

5- the defendant reserves the right to please furhter to the particulars of claim once and if the claimant properly particularises the same. in the meantime, it is denied that the claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief as pleaded at all.

 

 

please can i have some help i do not know what to do next or what much of this means.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi neofang

 

This is the usual Cobbetts rubbish that they send everyone. What does it mean? It means they are trying to intimidate you with legal sounding gibberish!

 

Here's what you do. You punch holes in it and put it in a file. Otherwise you ignore it. THen you send a very biref letter to Cobbetts with your schedule of charges attached (NatWest never bother to send them so the poor dears don't really know what's going on - that's why they are embarrassed - or ought to be!). Your letter should quote your claim number and bank account details and say something like

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Please find for your information a copy of the schedule of charges I am claiming.

 

Yours sincerely

 

neofang

You don't need to send anything else or answer any questions unless the court tells you to. If they do, post here and we'll help you.

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability.

Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site

  • Haha 1

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ever so much, i just got off the phone with Cobbetts, they said exactley the same thing, i was supprised at how helpful they were.

 

thanks for the advice i will let you know how i get on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mine has been going since March amd I have just had my court date for August, the £3k they owe me is keeping me strong, I just keep thinking of that sun kissed beach with the proceeds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all, a letter from Natwest turned up this morning offering £3035

 

i was orginally claiming for £4165, what do you think i should do?

 

i was thinking about calling them and saying that i would like this plus the £125 for the court fee's?

 

do you think i should ask for any other money? any advice would be much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi neofang, if the amount they've offered is your full charges (minus 8% interest) - you need to decide what you want to do (accept or reject and wait for them to add on the court filing fee as well). send them a letter rejecting their offer http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/25716-rejecting-offers.html l Adapt the letter to say you'll only accept a refund of all charges - plus the court filing fee, and continue with your claim whilst you await a response.

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...