Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
    • luckily like this thread VCS/DCB(L) PCN spycar capture - PAPLOC Now claimform - no Stopping in Restricted Zone - Bristol Airport ***Claim Dismissed*** - Page 4 - Private Land Parking Enforcement - Consumer Action Group although no on the crossing, same applies to you so WS time. there are numerous threads here on pedestrian crossing claimforms by VCS at Bristol and at other airports so use our enhanced google searchbox and find them. really a bad idea to vanish for SIX months and not been have reading up here.....................  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

RBS are threatening to turn up at my house next week


Shally
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6202 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Just when I thought everything was going quiet I received this card in the post today saying that an RBS rep will be turning up on the 21st June.

 

What should I do call? call them they have left a number.

 

Shally

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Just when I thought everything was going quiet I received this card in the post today saying that an RBS rep will be turning up on the 21st June.

 

What should I do call? call them they have left a number.

 

Shally

 

why are they turning up at your house?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont do any thing.

 

IF and a big one at that that they do turn up dont answer the door, tell them they are tresspassing and you are going to call the police and if they dont leave then definately call the cops. They have no right whatsoever to come to your property without your express permission.

 

Dont call the number on the card, thats what they want you to do! Play them at thier own game. Let them come because if it ever goes to court you can use that as harrassment as well as showing they have breach the OFT debt collection guidelines.

 

I have postcards from MBNA saying they 'we are going to call on **** date' misleading or what!!!!! At first i thought they were coming round so i called the number, but then i realised that that is why they sent the card, to scare me into to calling them...W****ers.

 

I also had a woman phone me to tell me she was on her way round to my house!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's really disgusting how much they play around with us.

 

I live on my own but have a very demanding job therefore not around much, HOWEVER my mum is at my place most days looking after my dogs and I'm so scared they turn up while she is here as I've not told her my problems because she is getting on and would worry more than I do about it all.

 

Shally

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you post what the card actually says.

 

I have a good few debts with HboS for thousands and have never come across these cards from them.

 

Just wondering if its a debt collector pretending to be the bank

 

Whats the number on the card?

 

PAul

Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be wise to write to them saying you do not wish them to visit. Just to cover your back. I sent one to CSL on behalf of EGG when they threatened a home visit. Here is a paragraph of the letter:-

 

Please note that I am only prepared to communicate with you in writing. Should it be your intention to arrange a ‘home visit’, please remember that there is only an implied license under English Common Law for certain people to visit me on my property without express permission: the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd (1959 2 Q.B per Lord Evershed M.R). Please therefore take note that, I revoke license under English Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so without my permission, you will then be liable to damages for tort of trespass. You would also be conspiring in a trespass if you sent someone to visit me nevertheless. Should it be necessary, I will obtain an injunction.

 

They never did visit maybe it was the letter or maybe it was just an empty threat, i will never know!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Yaffsimon1 I will use that.

 

I called the number and it's a company called Retail Collections, then put the phone down...:p I asume the debt has been passed to a DCA now. Nice of them to let me know:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Yaffsimon1 I will use that.

 

I called the number and it's a company called Retail Collections, then put the phone down...:p I asume the debt has been passed to a DCA now. Nice of them to let me know:rolleyes:

 

And if you didn't withhold your number, they also have a phone number to call now and try to find out which of their "customers" called and hung up !!

 

Not a good move, if you must call them, always withhold your number.

Nil Illigitimus Carborundum

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...