Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I dont want to, i just wanted to relate with this person. The council just wants to rip off people
    • I paid for the furniture with a visa debit card so not sure if this is the same consumer rights as a credit card? The furniture is without a doubt unfit for purpose because of the reclining mechanism not working correctly. I suspect that I may be offered either a repair, a replacement or a credit note (that's if they accept that there are problems with the furniture). Do I have to accept a credit note or can I insist that I want a full refund?
    • Hi @Dislao As advice for everyone is different and tailored to your situation, please make your own thread and describe your issue.
    • Ok so they have given you the contract of you and packlink. your enforcing the rights of the contract between evri and packlink.... so I don't really think this contract makes a smudge of difference. unless ive missed something @BankFodder   Also on the bit that says "Evri also cite Clause 23 of the pre-exiting commercial agreement between the Defendant and Packlink,"   such agreement hasnt been provided so can't be considered. judges arent goign to consider a term that the defendant has just said exists. thats not how it works.    
    • I think Stockford Anderson are the land owners there. You could ring their London number 020 3443 8500 to confirm. if so the CEO paul Anderson and his son Aaron are about to climb Mount Everest to raise money for Dementia UK. There have been a number of fatalities on the mountain recently though the CEO of Iceland did complete the UK Dementia challenge last week. However the winds over Everest are going to increase in the next few days so anyone not on the way up at the moment are likely to be prevented from climbing.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SPEEDY VS NATIONWIDE - need advice please!!


speedy016
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6144 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone

 

I have been reading this site for quite a while and its brilliant, its down to all the good advice and encouragement from every body that on 4th May I took the first step and sent off my SAR request recorded delivery.

It was signed for on 5th May, I have the proof printed off just in case!!

They cashed my 10.00 cheque on the 21st May.

After reading some of the threads I thought I would give the Data Protection lot a quick call and chase up my statements. The very pleasant man didn,t ask me for my account number or any info just said my 40 days is up on the 14th June but they are not keeping records they are just going in an in-tray and being dealt with in order, it is unlikely I will receive my statements in time as they are inundated!! so would I ring back on the 18th June and if they are ready for being printed off he will be able to tell me because at that stage they will be on the system.

I don't think that this is acceptable they are confirming over the phone that they won't be ready without even taking any of my details and I have set a time limit so why should I have to wait for them.

Only problem is I am a bit unsure of what to do if I haven't received them on the 40th day.

Can anyone please help and advise me what would be the best thing to do.

From reading the info I think I am supposed to send them a letter giving them a further 7 days.

Is that right?

:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah its an lba but you threaten them with court for non compliance with the SAR.

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that

The annoying thing is I've got most of my statements but i have 1 full years missing otherwise I could have just gone in with the letter asking for a refund, never mind, by the time I get to that stage I will be able to add the 350 in charges that are going on this month!!!

Thanks again.

 

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just been reading the step-by-step guide AGAIN!!!!! Trying my best but not the brightest.:lol:

 

So just a quick question, if I don't receive my statements in the 40 days as requested do I also report NW to the Information Commissioner as well as sending NW a non-compliance letter. Not sure if I do both or is it one or the other?

 

Any advice appreciated.

 

Thanks

Speedy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Speedy. Don't worry. This is usual delaying by NW but after 3 letters and a strong assurance I would go to the Information Commissioner they gave me what I wanted; albeit late. I then went through prelim. and LBA stage and was about to file my claim online when I came accross this thread....'another win-Cuddlles v Nationwide' . I HIGHLY RECOMMEND it. I held off filing and went that way instead. I have opened up my own thread to keep people informed of my results. Good Luck

Tricky

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Trickyt and monopoly23 :-)

 

NW's 40 days are up at the end of the week and I haven't heard a thing from them apart from the phone call I made which wasn't any help.

 

Do you think I should try ringing again and telling them they only have til the end of the week to supply the info. I am waiting for postman every morning but nothing ever arrives!! :evil:

 

Any suggestions?

Speedy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to go out with someone called speedy lol.... but lets not go there.

 

Anyway, if you still don't receive anything at all, sent them the DPA non-compliance letter. Here it is if you need it.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/6986-data-protection-act-non.html

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to go out with someone called speedy lol.... but lets not go there.
I used to go out with someone who had monopoly......I went there!...pmsl...:D

(NOT monopoly23, I might add though!)

 

 

Hello speedy016!

 

Read the links that are pointed to in #6 of the following Thread...

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/nationwide/86629-artrex-nationwide-having-hard.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MTM

 

Thanks for that, hopefully that letter will do the trick, blunt and straight to the point. I like it. :-)

 

I just don't like the way they seem to be stringing things out so early on in my battle!!!

 

Thanks again

Speedy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys

 

40 days for S.A.R. is up today and Mr Postie hasn't brought my statements :sad:

 

Can someone just verify my dates to make sure I don't proceed too soon.

 

I sent S.A.R on 4th May, its was signed for on 5th may (Sat) will I be better off sending the non-compliance letter on Monday

 

Any advice on this will be appreciated, I no I keep asking but I just want to make sure I do everything right.

 

Thanks

Speedy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your dates are right. You could try ringing the dept. thats dealing with SARs but I don't know how much good that would do.

 

State that they've taken payment but not provided the service and so on, and just because all the requests are being dealt with in order, does not give them the right to breach the time limit.

 

If you dont get anything out of them, Id sent the non-compliance letter today.

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem. You could always click my scales.....;) lol

  • Haha 1

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice one Speedy! you're definitely NOT the speedy i knew...:)

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right everyone, I phoned 01793 583062 to chase up my S.A.R, the lady was really nice and confirmed that my statements had been sent out a week ago but Royal Mail are taking their time delivering them because the packages are too big and bulky! She confirmed that NW are completely up to date with dealing with ALL S.A.R requests and there is no longer a back log. So everyones request should be dealt with within the 40 days.

 

She actually said they have ordered my statements twice! Don't understand that bit cos today is the only time I have had to give my account details to anyone!

 

She said that she will order a list of charges which will be on the system tomorrow and I should receive them on Monday.

 

WATCH THIS SPACE

Hope this is of use to anyone in the same situation as me

 

Speedy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you request just statements for the dates you were missing or the whole lot?

Im not surprised about the comment on RM. They are getting really shoddy and not even bothering to get signatures for most recorded stuff.

I'll take a bet that their profits boom this year though with all the mail being sent to the banks and back...

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think I should ring back and say that the list of charges will do for now but I still want my statements. I requested everything since the account was opened!

 

She implied that my statements were posted out a week ago! Do you think she was trying to fob me off?

Speedy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Speedy, I'm at the same stage as you. I rang the number you quoted and also spoke to a nice lady who told me I would have my charges by beginning of next week at the latest. Which is fine by me. Hope it true and I can start claiming my money back :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

...the lady was really nice and confirmed that my statements had been sent out a week ago but Royal Mail are taking their time delivering them because the packages are too big and bulky! She confirmed that NW are completely up to date with dealing with ALL S.A.R requests and there is no longer a back log. So everyones request should be dealt with within the 40 days.

 

She actually said they have ordered my statements twice! Don't understand that bit cos today is the only time I have had to give my account details to anyone!

 

She said that she will order a list of charges which will be on the system tomorrow and I should receive them on Monday.

 

WATCH THIS SPACE

 

Hope this is of use to anyone in the same situation as me

Total b*ll*cks!!!

 

Statements are despatched via Special Delivery (...which have to be signed for btw) and are delivered to certain timescales.

The packages are A4 size and if there are quite a number of statements, U will receive several packages.

 

To say that your statements have been ordered TWICE implies that they weren't 'ordered' in the 1st place.

Wait until Monday by all means.

 

But bear in mind that the general advice is NOT to telephone Banks etc + to conduct ALL dealings with them via written correspondance.

Cos Nationwide are now passed the Statutory 40 days that they had to comply to your S.A.R. they are committing an offence.

 

If your statements don't arrive by next Monday + U telephone them again and they give U another excuse, how do U suppose that U will be able to substantiate what they have told U, if it becomes necessary U to go to court to get them??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks MTM

 

Do you reckon I should send non-compliance letter, I understand what you are saying so I won't be phoning them again.

 

I think i will be better sticking to my timescales and just issuing letters, would you agree?

 

Speedy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. I wouldn't ring them again. I only suggested it in the first place for your own peace of mind really on the offchance that you wounldn't be fobed off, which obvioussly you have.

Just issue the non-compliance on Monday. You can request all recordings of phonecalls between yourself and them but I doubt you'd get them.

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I had £1 for every Claimant that STILL puts faith in a phone call + believes every word that they are told by a Bank Employee, who is only basically telling them a scripted response from higher management, I'd be able to employ some 'super-dooper' touch-typist to do my typing for me, instead of wearing out the one finger on each hand that I use at the moment!...lol...:D

 

Despite people reading countless Threads about Banks + DCA's denying that Penalty Charges are unlawful and deliberately misleading potential Claimants by sending out letters that say as such, people STILL think that cos someone from the Bank has told them something on the phone 'it MUST be true'???!!

 

That particular logic...I'm sorry, I just can't understand!!!

 

Nobody is 'special'...we are ALL just numbers, to the Banks etc.

There is NO miraculous 'short-cut' that someone hasn't tried before.

The following link explains it in a nutshell really...

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/31575-important-things-you-really.html

 

The WHOLE Re-claiming process will take approx 3-4months if the maximum timescales are adhered to + a Refund is forthcoming...

S.A.R....................................................................................................................40 days

Preliminary Letter...........................................................................................14 days

Letter Before Action....................................................................................14 days

Filing Claim at Court + Defendant receiving your PoC..........................10 days

Court receiving Acknowledgement of Service from Defendant......14 days

Court receiving Defence from Defendant..............................................14 days

 

For some Claimants there will be further delays at the begining with the obtaining of the info from the S.A.R.

 

Other Claimants will develop delays in the later stages, with Court Transfers, Allocation Questionaires, Hearings etc etc.

 

At each + every stage a Bank will attempt to wriggle + squirm to deter a Claimant + to prolong the inevitable Refund.

 

Where many Claimants fall down + get into a panic + confused, is when they deviate from the well trodden path that has previously brought numerous successes.

 

Sure, there is NO denying that 'now + then' a Claimant gets a result from a 'helpful' Bank Employee + some Claimants will even get their Refund sooner than expected + relatively trouble free.

But that is the exception, rather than the rule!

...and so it is far better to follow the % action recommended.

 

From the moment that a Claimant 1st sends off their S.A.R., they HAVE to remain in control of the timescales.

It is the ONLY way that they will be able to preserve their sanity!!!...:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...