Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Rockinrodders Vs Barclaycard


rockinrodders
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6183 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

SAR request sent on 11th May to Barclaycard Northampton address. included a photocopy of my drivers licence, plus a full list of all my previous addresses. Unfortunately the account was closed in 2003 and I do not have the card number.

 

Received a letter back yesterday saying they had no record of an account held by me at any of my addresses.

 

Obviously that's rat$hit as I have actually had two cards with them in the past although the first one was closed in about 1999, the second one was closed in 2003.

 

I even had a debt collection company contact me out of the blue about a year ago asking for payment of an outstanding balance of about £800 and place a default on my credit file. After complaining to Barclaycard and the DCA they eventually agreed that there had been an admin problem when I made the final settlement payment, they hadnt closed the account properly and the annual fee or whatever had been charged and had been spiralling for 3 years. They agreed it was a mistake and wiped all the adverse data etc straight away and apologised.

 

So how can they now say that I never had an account with them?

 

muppets!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am having the same trouble with NatWest.

 

I dont know if it works but what about sending them a copy of the default from your credit file and ask them to explain - why if they did not supply you with a credit card have they placed a default on your credit file? I assume that it is under Barclaycard card services?

 

If you are still having difficulty then e-mail [email protected] I gave her a wrong account number and she was able to find my account after I supplied her with all my previous address'.

 

Good Luck!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I re-read the letter that Barclaycard sent to me and noticed that it actually said that they could not locate my account and because it had been closed since 2003/4 they would no longer keep any details on it!

 

I thought they legally had to keep information for 6 years?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I rang the customer relations office at Barclaysham to follow up on why they couldn't locate my account. After a couple of minutes on hold, they found my account and it was still being handled by collections.

 

They said they couldn't find it as it was sold to a debt collector. Now the account was actually sold in error to the debt collector AFTER it was closed and I had paid off the balance. Its a long story.....

 

Anyway barclaycard said that although they can see that they had made an error and had not even thought to check with the collections area for the account, I would still have to send them the SAR request again, because they returned the cheque when they replied last time saying they had no record of an account.

 

Surely the original 40 day timescale is still in operation? Them not finding the account was purely a delaying tactic. They located it no problem when I rang them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Barclaycard sent me a load of statements, but only relating to 2004 onwards, so they're all blank because the account was closed in 2003

 

They reckoned it might be another 6 weeks for them to get the older data off their microfiche.

 

Its been 36/37 days sonce they received the SAR so Im not waiting another 6 weeks. Shall I write them the non-compliance letter or just get the ball rolling on with a prelim for charges and claim an amount 'to be confirmed'??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Its been well over 40 days and I still havent got the microfiche statements and this is where all my charges were as the account closed in 2002. It was the last 12 months where I think a lot of charges at least late payment and overlimit each month every month.

 

Does anybody know what their standard penalty charge was in 2002 ish? I will then write prelim based on estimate. They havent supplied the credit agreement either and that well well outside the timescale required.

 

I wrote to ICO but they just say they'll write to them and ask them to hurry up

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to let you know that it took 98 for my statements to arrive from a closed a/c, and that happened after I issued an LBA for non-compliance of LBA and threatened to report them to the IC.

 

You will get your statemtns but you will probably need to work hard to get them ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

After the intial delaying tactics of saying they couldn't find my account, I called and they found it in seconds. I sent a combined LBA for non compliance with a further demand for statements. They sent the first part of the statements within a couple of weeks, but unfortunately they were all from 2004+ but the account was closed in 2002-3 so all the statements were blank!

 

It is the older microfiche stuff that I am waiting for that they reckon 'we are not required to supply as we believe that it falls outside the DPA but as a gesture of goodwill we will supply what we can but will take a long time'

 

But the big charges period is 2001-2 and obviously they are taking as much time as they can so they can refuse to supply the earlier ones as they are outside the 6 year scope. Every month they delay they think they are saving themselves 2 x £20 for charges that become over 6 years

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received the rest of my statements today dating back to 2002 when I opened the account. There was only £300 in charges.

 

When I settled the account in 2003 I paid them £163 short as agreed with them as full and final settlement with the DCA that was chasing the debt at the time.

 

I am not sure whether to bother reclaiming the charges or if its best to let sleeping dogs lie as presumably they will try and offset any repayment against the balance they wrote off in 2002.

 

I do not have a default on this account and am concerned that they might try and give me one in retaliation if I take them to court to reclaim charges.

 

Any else had similar experiences?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...