Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So I am now in receipt of a second Letter of Claim this time from DCBL although their letter head now says " DCBLegal"  😱 Now I'm guessing one response to a letter of claim is sufficient and I could ignore this but having been inspired by other snotty letters I wanted to have another bash at one. How does this sound? Dear Lackeys of Company with Unconscionable Morals, Thank you ever so much for gracing me with yet another Letter Before Claim on behalf of Excel Parking Services. How many of these delightful missives do you plan on sending before you muster the courage to follow through on your threats to take me to court? Just so we're clear, here is the response (in italics by that I mean the slanted text below) I previously sent to Excel’s Letter Before Claim, in case your attention to detail is as lacking as I suspect: I am currently 2-0 up in terms of Small Claims Court proceedings and I look forward to the opportunity to claim a hat trick, this case being more straightforward than my previous two. I will be asking the court for an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g) due to your conduct over this absurd claim. Despite my best efforts, you continue to assert that I have breached your terms. However, I cannot breach terms that I was not present to accept. Have you even read my initial response? I suggest you review it thoroughly and save yourself some money. Additionally, please refer to section 13 of the IPC Code of Practice, 2023 edition. I eagerly await your deafening silence. Remarkably, I haven't heard a peep from Excel since my response; instead, they've passed the baton to you to perform this tiresome routine once more. Consider this my official notice that I am sending a cease and desist letter to Excel Parking Services. Their relentless hounding has crossed the line into clear harassment. Any further demands for payment from you, as Excel's lackeys, will be regarded as nothing more than shameless acts of intimidation and harassment. I now look forward to the deafening sound of your silence. Yours sincerely,
    • Personally I'd go to it and object for the sake of it. They have to attend anyway so I can't see you being liable for any costs or anything (if they try to ask for attendance costs, just say that firstly it is their application, secondly it is from their own making, thirdly that they would have to come anyway so you shouldn't need to bear their costs.   When you turn up you should object on the basis that the witness has been in office since the time of the order, and could have done their witnes statement in advance of their AL. Their poor planning is not your fault, 7 days is too rushed for you as a LIP and there is no good reason that a company can't organise itself to sort WX in time. Also they say finalise so they already have something, its not like thye have nothing. Their amendments cannot be so important if they are being added so late.   see what @AndyOrch says but that's my thoughts  
    • Yes, in the main your understanding of my case is right. Linked below to the post with the final WS sent to the court and to Evri.   
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. As you say, appealing this ticket doesn't help as these people hardly ever accept appeals. They don't care how difficult someone's life is, they just want the money. The forum guys should be along later with thoughts for you on how to deal with this. Best, HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Camdenite Vs. Abbey


Camdenite
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5050 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 319
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Camdenite,

 

i have not received a PM as yet, i have refrained from posting any reply til i recieve it because i wasnt sure if it would have any bearing on my reply if you get what i mean

 

regards

 

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right then

 

Firstly, my appologies for the time taken to reply, i have had a nightmare with my pc which has left me with a major headache. anyway, i blame Lula for that:lol:

 

now then moving swiftly on to the main issue

 

i have sought advice from someone who has a excellent knowledge of contract law, i explained the situation and was advised as follows

 

firstly , i was advised that the fact that the agreement does not specify the amount of the claim,by splitting it into two it wouldn't amount to a breach of contract, also if you look at the companies website it sets out that they will act as lay representatives and deal with the claim in the small claims track. now obviously the SCT has a max limit of 5K so they would have had to split the claim

 

Now, by failing to communicate with you and failing to file the allocation questionnaires correctly, this would constitute a breach of section 13 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. i am advised that this breach would be a breach of warranty as opposed to a Breach of condition and there fore would entitle you to claim damages but would not allow for you to end the contract

 

now this would mean at the point where you ended the contract, you yourself were in breach of the contract.

 

however that said, its not all doom and gloom,

 

Where a party seeks to terminate a contract before the contract has been discharged the other party has a choice they can either accept the breach and claim damages there and then or they can choose to continue with the contract and claim the agreed contract price at the end

 

now since you have ended the contract at XX point in time, my understanding is that they would be entitled to their costs up to that point but not any further so they certainly wouldn't be entitled to the full costs under the contract as they haven't fulfilled it

 

i would send them a letter pointing out that you ended the contract when you did for the reasons set out and see what they say

 

if they claim they have fulfilled the contract then hit them with a SAR asking for the file and details on all the actions they have taken in respect of your claim and see exactly what they have done

 

It may well be that the limited amount of work they did would amount to a breach of condition in relation to the duty to exercise reasonable care and skill under the SoGaSA 1982.

 

 

i hope this helps

 

if you have any questions please ask mate,

 

im sorry if it wasnt the answer exactley you were looking for but i do feel based upon what ive been told, you have a strong bargaining hand here

 

 

Regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick question, Just drafting the letter and wondered if I should make reference to the % of the GOGW they received in December '06 being more than adequate to cover their Court Cost submission fee (£120) or is this not relevant?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is relevent :-) Paul says,

if hes paid them funds he should refer to those funds already paid, as they would be taken into account

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have a general question about how the Courts operate. My case is currently stayed, but just prior to the stay I filed a Notice of Service to amend the claim amount. Although the Court has acknowledged over the phone that they have the amended claim, they have not, despite repeated requests, been able to confirm that to me in writing.

 

They did once say they would send a letter, but the lady in question is no longer working there and everyone I have spoken to since has not been able to help. Am I right to want something in writing confirming the change as in a years time (after victory in the House of Lords ;) ) I guess things will be a little hectic at the Courts and I have had enough of them "losing" Application Notices in the past. Twice, in fact!

 

Needless to say, although a copy of the Notice of Service was also issued by me to Abbey they have not acknowledged either, but I guess they don't have to.

 

Any suggestions gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Just thought I'd drop in and have a look about. Some of you will remember this thread hopefully? Anyway, I've had a letter in the post from Abbey this morning offering me an overdraft of £2,000!

 

After all these years of financial mis-management on my part, and the fact that their regular cash-cow of charges from me over that period has dried up completely over the last 18 months, they now think I'm stupid enough to go down that path again.

 

I'm composing a suitably sarcastic response, but any input welcome ;)

 

Re> the above post, I did finally get the letter from the court acknowledging the amendment, and so at least I know the updated N1 is the one gathering dust :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hahahaha just what I like to hear, they hadn't a leg to stand on especially after the DPA stuff, excellent !!!!

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi all,

 

I thought I'd better reactivate this thread. :)

 

The two months from the SCJ verdict is nearly up and although I haven't heard anything from Abbey or the court yet, I'm expecting a strikeout application to be submitted shortly.

 

I notice that the Penalty Charges site has now put up a "Defence Against Strikeout Applications" requesting a further month to amend the POC. Is there something similar on here? I couldn't find it.

 

I'd be happy to use the other site's defence but would rather use one from CAG if available. I used CAG's templates all along, and want to be 100% certain it's appropriate to my case.

 

By the way, penaltychargesforum seems to think the new POC will be up in the next couple of days. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...