Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Spurs 1981 vs Lloyds


spurs1981
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6131 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

I have been allocated a court date by Chester County Court on 4th July 2007 and I am representing my father in law. So far I have not had to produce an allocation questionnaire or any other documentation, and as the date is getting closer I am now wondering what the next step is?

 

My latest notification from the court states:

 

"The judge has considered the statements of case and allocation questionnaires filed and allocated the claim to the small claims track...Each party shall deliver to every other party and to the court office copies of all documents (including any experts' report) on which he intends to rely on in the hearing no later than 14 days before the hearing. The original documents should be brought to the hearing "

 

I have seen a number of threads regarding looking for settlement and was considering whether I should push for a settlement sooner rather than later?

 

I would appreciate advice on:

 

1. What to do in terms of formal next steps with the court / preparation

2. What options could there be in terms of getting to a settlement?

 

Thanks

 

Spurs 1981

Link to post
Share on other sites

See here, you need to prepare a bundle.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/82148-got-court-date-important.html

 

Not much you can really do regarding settlement, Lloyds settle in their own time.

 

Give us some more background relating to your claim, did you use the particulars of claim from this site, values etc....

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically I followed the process using all the templates from moneysavingexpert.com

 

After filing the online claim I got notification that Lloyds were defending the case and in the same letter a statement from the court saying: "the filing of an allocation questionnaire be dispensed with in this case unless the District Judge at the court of transfer orders otherwise"

 

I don't think he has ordered otherwise, since he has simply set a court date...

 

I have all the statements and am claiming £1500 plus interest so just over £2000 total. All the charges relate to unauthorised overdraft fees and returned direct debit fees.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Received letter from [problem] offering to enter into settlement negotiation which is great news, although it came too late in the day to avoid putting together the court bundle which was sent off today.

 

Have also sent letter to [problem] saying that we are happy to enter settlement negotiation as long as for the full amount!

 

We shall see what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a bit odd for SCM, they usually do not ask, they just make an offer, usually a full one excluding CI and pre 6 years claims. It seems a bit pointless.

 

Can you post up the exact wording of the SCM letter please.

 

I would not have sent a letter back saying yes to negotiation, as long as for the full amount - this is a contradiction, there is no negotiating on your part here.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The lettter states:

 

We have been instructed to write to you as our Client is, entirely on a without prejudice basis and with no admission whatsoever to liability, minded to enter into settlement negotiations with you but before doing so, we are told there appears to be a discrepancy in what you are seeking by way of a refund of bank charges.

 

We note from your pleadings that you are claiming (alleging) that various deductions were made from your account over the past few years, but you do not specifically say when and how.

 

In light of this, can you please provide us with the following information by return:

 

1. Each and every individual amount of the charge that you are claiming and are disputing

2. The date of each and every charge that you say was deducted from your account

3. How you calculate any interest

4. How you calculuate the sum of £2020.18

5. Confirm your sort code and bank account details

 

We would be grateful if you could respond within 14 days so that we can take our Client's further instructions. Yours, etc...

 

Now I assume because we did not require an allocation questionnaire, the reason they are asking for this detail is that they have not been passed all the information from Lloyds, which I provided with the initial letters I sent threatening court action.

 

I have sent the detail, including all statements and my response is as follows:

 

With regard to your instruction to enter into settlement, as per our initial correspondence I would like to re-emphasise that our claim is for repayment of ALL charges, plus interest, in addition to the court fees that have been incurred. If your client agrees to repay these charges then we shall consider this full and final settlement. This will be on a without prejudice basis and with no admission whatsoever to liability from your client. We will consider the case closed and instruct all pending court action to be cancelled.

 

I look forward to agreement of these terms from your client within the next 7 days in order that we have sufficient time to alert Chester County Court and avoid any further unneccesary waste of time and resources for all parties.

 

The interest calculation I have stated as follows:

 

interest has been accrued at a daily rate if 0.021% (or 8% APR, the statutory rate).

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are required to issue these details to the court and SCM after you file you claim. If you have not done so, do so immediately.

 

Why have you said this?

'This will be on a without prejudice basis and with no admission whatsoever to liability from your client.'

 

I presume you filed on line, therefore send 2 copies of your schedule of charges, clearly marked with your claim no. and a brief covering letter asking for them to be filed with your claim to:

 

The Court Manager,

Chester

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

(Your Name) –v- (Bank)

Claim No: ********

Date Issued: xx/xx/xx

 

Please find enclosed a schedule of penalty charges taken from me by the defendant, along with interest claimed at the annual rate of 8% pursuant to section 69 of the County Court Act. The interest in addition to the amount in charges equates to the total amount of my claim, namely £(AMOUNT).

 

I respectfully request that the enclosed schedule should be attached to the particulars of my claim.

Yours faithfully

 

Wait until you receive the Notice of Acknowledgement (not the Notice of Issue) from the court and then send a copy to the bank’s solicitors, since they are the ones who will now be dealing with your claim

 

Dear Sir,

 

(Your Name) -v- (Bank)

Claim No: ********

Date Issued: xx/xx/xx

 

 

Please find enclosed a copy of my schedule of charges relating to the above claim.

Yours faithfully

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would ring them and tell them that they have the information as it is contained in their court bundle. You can however tell them you will fax the information they require to them. They are trying to settle so its in your interest to provide the information to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify, the court should already have the schedule of charges as they were contained in my bundle which they would have received on Weds 20th June.

 

[problem] should now have the schedule of charges because they also will have received my bundle on Weds 20th and on the same date they would have had a direct response regarding their desire to settle which also contained the schedule of charges.

 

I can't need to send any more details to anyone, surely since all parties have had all the details on Weds 20th?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The court date is on Weds 4th July. I have not yet heard anything back from [problem] in terms of a settlement offer.

 

Should I contact them again, and by phone?

 

I am prepared to go to court but would rather not simply because I don't have a huge amount of time!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be prepared to be fobbed off, or even abused, but do not rise to it.

 

They are usually really awful on the phone.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I phoned this morning to find out the status of the claim and was told by the lady on the phone that she could see that they had sent a letter out on the 9th of June but not much else.

 

I explained I had replied to them on 19th June with all the information they had requested. All they had to say was "we are probably waiting for our clients' instructions and that you should assume that you will go to court". I thought it was a bit strange that they hadn't any record of my reply (which was sent registered).

 

Anyway, I then phoned my father in law (who I am representing) to tell him to get ready for court and he told me he'd received a phone call from [problem] asking for his bank account details.

 

He told them that I had sent them all the information before, but it all sounds like the left arm doesn't know what the right one is doing.

 

I have no idea what to expect next, but am assuming I will need to trek up to Chester County Court. If we do not settle tomorrow and Lloyds do not send anyone to court, I assume we go through the whole procedure...

 

Any support or advice as we get closer to D-Day would be greatly appreciated, I've got all my arguments together but all help welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ensure you check the account balance tomorrow and on the days of the hearing, they sometimes just drop the money in without notice.

 

Anyway, in case you have missed these:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/guidance-notes/641-case-guidance-notes-going.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/guidance-notes/637-case-guidance-notes-bringing.html

  • Haha 1

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We won the case. Lloyds decided not to contest, and from the correspondence I have received it looks as if they have changed solicitors.

 

We were in the room for less than 2 minutes.

 

Despite this, I am pleased I did the prep because it gave me great confidence in our case, and I would advise anyone else to do the same.

 

Perfect preparation prevents poor performance as they say - we got what we prepared for - a win!

 

Thanks for your help guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unusual who were the solicitors changed to?

 

Nice work, let us know when you receive the money and we will get your thread title changed.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...