Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
    • Thanks   Noting the day to apply for default judgement if necessary
    • nope, as the display model was not the colour the customer wanted. but your question is totally immaterial anyway as custom built doesn't come into it. dx
    • as long as aos is done by day 19 from the date on the claimform they get a total of 33 days to file a defence. (whereby the date top right on the claimform is ONE in the 33 day count) dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Vodafone charges


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6218 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

OK heres the story ...

 

Ive had a vodafone contract for years but having recently lost my job i found myself unable to pay the contract one month, now after i didnt pay my bill they just cut my phone off not just outgoing but incomming calls as well, i just got the message on my phone "unregistered sim card" so they must have popped my sim for me i was way over the end of this contract anyway so i had no contractual obligations to to carry on paying until it that was up but over and above the £35 i owed them they are wanting a further 2 months off me

 

So as my contract had finished anyway and they had cancelled the service i had with them should i pay them 2 extra months on top of what was outstanding ? personally i think not, well they aint getting it anyway but i was wondering where to go from here its now with a DCA any help would be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

your contract is for a minimum of 12 months. After that you keep it open unless you give them 1 month notice. I would say you are liable for the £35 you didnt pay them and 1 more month on top for your notice period. They pass all outstanding debt to a DCA and they will put their cut on top. I would be tempted to pay up as they will show a default othrwise which is not worth it.

Hope that helps a bit

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

to be honest i couldnt care less about a default ive got a whole shed load of em and one more aint gona make the slightest bit of difference im on the verge of bankruptcy anyway i just wanted to stick it to em.

 

Apart from that read the post i didnt cancel it they did so why the hell should i pay ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear about your dreaded bankrupcy. I did read the post.....it said any help would be appreciated. They suspended the service they didnt end the contract. As to your question "why the hell should I pay?" If you have used the service then I think you should pay if you can. Did you contact them to say you had lost your job? The DCA will contact you to arrange a payment plan that is affordable for you. Cant figure out why they added 2 months on if you were out of contract. Have you had an upgrade?

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry yes i did say any help would be appreciated and i certainly do appreciate the help i get on this site, the thing is i just dont see why i should pay the extra months when i was getting nothing from them

in there terms and conditions it says

 

b) We may end this Agreement immediately by writing to you if:-

• you do anything (or allow anything to be done) which we think may damage or affect the operation of the networks or you become bankrupt or make any arrangement with creditors or go into liquidation or become subject to an administration order or a receiver is appointed over any of your assets;

• you do not do what you have to do under this Agreement (e.g. you fail to pay any charges) and do not put it right within 7 days of being asked by us in writing to do so

 

seems to me that they deliberately dont go by what they say in the terms and conditions so they can make a bit more money out of you, why should i have to give one months notice is this fair ? does it really take them one month to turn your phone off i dont think so.

regardless of the contract i was not in reciept of any services so therefore why should i pay im going to send them a letter anyway stating my case and disputing the amount with an offer to pay the month that i owed see where it gets me i was just curious if there was anything in the utcc's that might apply here or any other applicable arguments or am i basically banged to rights.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's their side of the deal - your side (which you agreed to) is to keep your side of the bargain. One of the reasons why pre-pay is so popular is that you do not have to bow down to the operator and watch them wreck your financial reputation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...