Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Nat West easier than I thought


Explorer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6233 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all

Firstly I must say thanks to all on this site. I am NOT a computer person but the info I have got from this site has been everything in taking on Nat West.

Easier than I thought because two letters from me and the famous Mr Higley has offered to refund all the charges I claimed, over £3,500 on my small business account. I don't know if to accept this or to continue to attempt to get the over £800 interest which the CAG spreadsheet calculated for me. I don't know if things will change & banks will stop paying out.

I am a natural coward, but I can say to others that the CAG system WORKS. Thank goodness.

Good luck to all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi explorer, welcome on board and congratulations on your early result!!!

 

If you've been offered all charges back after the LBA, you must accept this. The courts would look at your case unfavourably if you refuse their offer - it would be seen as being done just to get the interest.

 

Main thing is - you've been offered a full refund - which is an absolutely brilliant result. Well done!!!! Best wishes, hedgey xxx :p

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang on a minute, Hedgey. I may be misunderstanding things here, but as I read it Explorer is simply being offered a refund of the charges themselves. He has every right to also require a refund of any interest that he has been charged on those penalties. He doesn't have to accept a refund simply because it refunds the principle. The interest has been charged unlawfully too. That can be recovered as well if explorer wants to.....Or am I missing something here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on what the interest is though doesn't it?

 

If it's the overdraft interest from when charges sent explorer overdrawn/over the overdraft level - then it's fine. If it's contractual - somebody else'll need to answer.

 

However, if it's the 8% interest - this can only be awarded by the courts anyway and to turn down an offer merely to get the 8% added on by the courts would be looked at unfavourably.

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, completely agree.

 

I guess the key is what Explorer is happy with at the end of the day.

 

That said, there's absolutely no doubt that the NatWest interest charged on the panalties can be recovered. Natwest will roll over.

 

Agree too that it's less clear-cut on contractual interest. I'm trying to decide myself at the mo whether to go for it. (Contractual in my case is >£10k)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sickofbanks, Never assume Nasty West will rollover. I am into my 6th year fighting Nasty West. Yes 6 years. If they detect any chink in your armour they will attack you very quickly. So beware don't drop your guard.

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang on a minute, Hedgey. I may be misunderstanding things here, but as I read it Explorer is simply being offered a refund of the charges themselves. He has every right to also require a refund of any interest that he has been charged on those penalties. He doesn't have to accept a refund simply because it refunds the principle. The interest has been charged unlawfully too. That can be recovered as well if explorer wants to.....Or am I missing something here?

 

 

I think explorer is refering to the statutoty 8% awarded at court stage and i agree with hedgey u should accept this offer

 

any comments welcome

 

scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello All

Sorry to be so long coming back. The interest I am talking about has not been charged by Nat West, it is the interest figures generated in the CAG spreadsheet.

I am afraid I am not a computer person, let alone a spreadsheet person, let alone an interest calculating person, let alone a ................. Shut up me before I get depressed.

I have nothing to be depressed about, I have a letter from the bank offering all the penalties back !

A bird in the hand.

I will think about it a bit & read over this site to try & understand a bit more.

Thanks all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best thing to do, Explorer, read up and understand a bit more.

 

But if the interest is the 8% calculated on the CAG spreadsheet, you'd be as well to accept the offer, as Scott and Hedgey said above, cos the 8% can only be awarded at court stage, so if they've offered full refund of everything else now then take the money, might look bad on you later on if you don't.

 

And you don't want your bird in the hand to flap its little Nastywest wings and bugger off now do you.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again

Explanation from spreadsheet template on claiming interest charges. Sorry as you can see I am not a computer person. You are lucky I have not accidently pasted family photos.

 

Interest is charged by the bank on any overdrawn balance. It is argued that had the penalties not been

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

charged the balance would be less overdrawn or even not at all, giving rise to a lower interest charge

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

or none at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again explorer!!

 

When you say it's the interest generated by the CAG spreadsheet, do you mean when you've entered a charge it says number of days since offence and then gives you an interest figure (8%) at the side of it?

 

If this is the case, this is definitely the interest that can only be awarded by the courts (s.69 at 8%). And again, please accept the offer that nat west have sent to you. A full offer to refund all charges at LBA stage is a great result and is what we all should be aiming for!! This thread (I think!) explains about accepting nat west's offer to refund all charges at LBA stage (about three quarters of the way down!!) http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o....tructions.html

 

So congratulations............. a really good win for you!

 

Hedgey xxx :p

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again

 

I'm getting confused now...depends which template you've used, if you've used the one detailed by Hedgey above, then definitely accept the offer. It doesn't get better than this at LBA stage. Hope they decide to cough up my charges at LBA. I'd be accepting the offer quicker than you could say "where do I sign" .

 

Congratulations - enjoy your money

 

Wendy x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am making myself look like a half wit now, good job I am annoy mouse !

 

Am using Spreadsheet 6 Interest calculation in the "Bussiness Claims Basic guide " this calculates the 8 % BUT you don't use that untill the court claim ie columns R & Y. BUT you do claim interest which is an estimate of the extra interest which the bank charged you which they would not have charged you if they had not charged the penalties and made the overdraft bigger.

 

I have just read through what I have just typed and it does sound drivel. I may have to go and lie down !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Awwwwwww.......... here you go mate - mop yer brow on me hanky!!!!

 

In which case, it sounds as though you've quite rightly hidden the 8% interest column and the additional interest is overdraft interest which you're perfectly entitled to reclaim.

 

Two schools of thought on this - and it's up to you whether to proceed. First school of thought is to say go for it, file at court and go after the overdraft interest as well.

 

Second school of thought is (the one I subscribe to!!!) would the money have stayed in yer account long enough to earn you this interest or would yer have spent it?? And before anybody shouts at me - cos I know this one's been argued to death!!! - I'm just giving him/her both sides!!!!! Don't shoot me down in flames!!!!!

 

I think this one's purely your decision now explorer. If you decide to go for the overdraft interest as well - you'll get loads of support on this forum to do so.

 

Decisions, decisions!!!!!

 

Hedgey xxx :p

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm ... I had some interest on my account once, 2p I think was the most I ever got. On this premise I personally decide not to go for the interest, not really cos I was being noble, just cos it was a bit complicated and wouldn't have amounted to much anyway. Also, my dosh is never in my account long enough to get interest so thought it might be something that natwest could jump up and bite me on the bum with!

 

Depends how much it is I suppose - is it a life changing amount and worth the extra aggro, time trouble etc.... or, if you hadn't claimed the interest in the first place, would you be happy with the offer that's now on the table...

 

Whatever decision you make, rest assured that it will be your decision and the right one for you at the time.

 

Wendy

Link to post
Share on other sites

No No No No Yes

i appreciate both sides, thanks

It would not have stayed in account long enough to earn interest but as per spreadsheet they would have had to charge me less interest.

Will do as I said and think, which is quite an effort in itself.

 

Thank you for offer of Hedgey's Hanky but some personal hygiene risks there.

You may have had to incinerate hanky.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol explorer............. what you like!!!!!

 

Please say no more on the personal hygiene stuff........... way too much information there honey!!!!!

 

Happy thinking!!!!!!! xxx :p

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In reply to Wendy there,

Yes Yes Yes Yes No

You are quite right, the decision is if it is worth the extra aggro and risk of spoiling the offer I have already got. The interest would be just over £800, but a few months ago I had no idea that there was any chance of claiming back what I have been offered. There are plenty of people on this site much further away from an easy settlement as per the one I have been lucky enough to get.

Thanks for the info.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should explain myself here, I am indeed a simple country fellow, only very much a beginner at this sort of forum business, and I think that it is possible that my little hankerchief jest may have been slighty misinterpreted. I do apologise for this and hope that no one finds my remarks more repulsive than they were intended.

Re the Vicar of Dibley, I have to try to imagine who I am talking to on this forum stuff, well you remember the Parish Council meetings they used to have....?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure do remember those meetings...I look nothing like Dawn French (somewhat taller and scraggier..) but have the same warped sense of humour I think!

 

And I'm sure no offence taken by anyone, if there was we'd soon let you know, shy retiring lot that we are!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...