Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later the your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. So if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place and park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and then unload the children followed by reloading the children getting seat belts on etc before driving to the exit stopping for cars, pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
    • Hi  no nothing yet. Hope it stays that way 😬
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

rockinrodders V Cap One inc contractual claim


rockinrodders
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6115 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

I received an offer of settlement from Cap One solicitors today, the same day as I received the acknowledgement from the court.

 

They offered fees plus all purchase interest and court interest plus court fee, total £550 but said that they had paid off the balance of the card which was £214 and send a cheque for the difference.

 

My claim was for around £2k because i included contractual interest.

 

They did not mention the default removal which was part of my claim.

 

The card was originally settled £214 short as full and final settlement in 2003 and this is confirmed by experian and equifax, so I don't believe they can now reopen the closed account and offset part of the settlement.

 

Do I accept the cheque for the difference as part settlement or do I just reject the offer outright and proceed to court.

 

I'm not really too bothered about the money but I do want the default removed as it was for £500 of which £380 was charges and therefore the debt was overstated greatly.

 

What does anyone think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i got a letter like yours and am in a quandry as to whether to go any further.Did not get the cci it was £1300 difference only paintball has answered my thread if i get anymore advice will let you know as answers for some of us on this forum are few and far between.Was yours a big difference in money? If it is just the default and you are not in great need for the mone I would press them for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sowerby, the contractual interest came to £1700 nearly as all the charges were 2001/2. The claim was for just over £2k. So £1400 different to their offer.

 

I checked their figures which didn't include contractual and they calculated 8% court interest at just £58 since 2002. Even on the basic non-contractual spreadsheet it comes to nearly £200

 

So their £140 short of a normal settlement with just 8% stat anyway plus with the £214 they have paid to the closed account, the claim is short over £300 of the standard fees plus 8% claim.

 

I'd happily forget the contractual but Im not getting skanked on the court interest AND the default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i think they may come to a mid way settlement as i rang them and they said i had to put in writng to them that i was not happy with the payment.So dont write anything off yet try sending them a letter i am going to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

rockinrodders, stick to your guns about the default, do not accept any money and if they send a cheque return it, tell them the default is linked to your claim and you will only stop the claim when they have done so, make sure you get everything in writing. They will remove it, I got mine removed plus the late markers on my credit file, my hubby also got his removed. As for your offer letter, I am afraid it is the same one I got. Two months after I refused their offer I did eventually manage to get them to enter into a dialogue, at the moment they have offered another £200 as a GOGW.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Doo, I have written a rejection letter and told them to try again. I'll send it tomorrow. I told them politely to check their sums as well, as the 8% stat they offered instead was even wrong, not that I'd be taking it anyway!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I Returned the AQ to the court last week. Court manager said it was business as usual and hadn't heard of any cases being stayed there because of the OFT case.

 

Cap One entered a defence which had been cut and paste from another case. the amounts were wrong, even the claim amount etc.

 

They then went on to say they were defending on the basis that the case had been settled in full.

 

It was probably the right defence but for the wrong case.

 

I rejected the offer weeks ago anyway as they cut me short, they offered charges plus purchase but only £53 for stat 8% interest. The spreadsheet worked out stat 8% as £180.

 

Also the amount they said they had paid me was £250 more than the cheque that they sent because they had offset the rest against the partially settled account. I have a letter from them proving that the account had no outstanding balance and that no payments were outstanding because a few weeks ago I called someone else at Cap one and asked for a letter saying to confirm this. I received a letter from them saying:

 

Thank you for contacting us about the default that we've recorded on your credit file.

 

This default is recorded as satisfied, which means that no further payments are due. This willl remain on your credit file for 6 years from the date of the default. blah blah blah

 

Anyway, I returned the AQ to the court and asked the court to strike out the defence on grounds of abuse of process due to the fact that they couldn't be bothered to write a defence specific to the case. I also included the documents showing the correct amount of the claim, the actual amount of the cheque they sent none of which tallied with their paperwork.

 

I wrote back to Cap One as well and enclosed a copy of the AQ and restated that I had rejected their offer as it had cut me short £150 on interest and £250 paid into the closed account because they had admitted there was no payments due on the account in which they had offset it.

 

I said that if they corrected that and removed the default we had a deal, if not its up to the judge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok... well done. The default has to be completly removed with no trace at all. Keep us posted.

 

Uk

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I received a letter from the court last week with another AQ form attached, requesting a £100 AQ fee. I had already paid this and sent the form back weeks ago, the letter was dated 12th August but not received till about the 23rd. I called the court and told them I had already paid and returned and they agreed. They said my original was in their office being typed up when it should have been in front of the judge, so the letter was sent out automatically but now my case cannot go in to be allocated by the judge until the 6th September as he does it monthly.

 

Should I be sending nudge letters to Cap One or just wait for the court to set a court date?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Called the court again to chase it up today and they reckoned they had not got my AQ and the judge had ordered the case to be struck out if it was not received. I said that they had cashed my cheque back in August and that they had confirmed receipt 2 weeks ago. Then she checked the system and realised that they had received my AQ back at the start of August but it had been lost in their office whilst being typed up. She apologised and asked me to send her another copy. I sent that today and she promised to put it in front of the judge tomorrow.

 

She said Cap One had still not sent theirs in despite the judge giving them an extra month to do so and sending them a reminder, so hopefully they'll accept my request for judgement by default.

 

I did speak to somebody from Cap One, who phoned after I emailed them. They agreed that their calculations were wrong as I pointed out. They agreed to increase the settlement to include this and to include the removal or all adverse information including the default.

 

I told them I needed a cheque in my hand and a written confirmation of the default removal before telling the court they had paid up.

 

If they me mess about, I'll keep pushing for the default judgement as that includes contrctual interest and not just the purchase we agreed on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bob, The request for judgement form was on the bottom of the notice of issue I got right at the start of the court case.

 

The lady at the court told me this was fine. She was putting my case before the judge today. Hope he accepts my directions to throw out the defence for failing to return their documents despite being given a months extension.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...