Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

rockinrodders V Cap One inc contractual claim


rockinrodders
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6115 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

I received an offer of settlement from Cap One solicitors today, the same day as I received the acknowledgement from the court.

 

They offered fees plus all purchase interest and court interest plus court fee, total £550 but said that they had paid off the balance of the card which was £214 and send a cheque for the difference.

 

My claim was for around £2k because i included contractual interest.

 

They did not mention the default removal which was part of my claim.

 

The card was originally settled £214 short as full and final settlement in 2003 and this is confirmed by experian and equifax, so I don't believe they can now reopen the closed account and offset part of the settlement.

 

Do I accept the cheque for the difference as part settlement or do I just reject the offer outright and proceed to court.

 

I'm not really too bothered about the money but I do want the default removed as it was for £500 of which £380 was charges and therefore the debt was overstated greatly.

 

What does anyone think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i got a letter like yours and am in a quandry as to whether to go any further.Did not get the cci it was £1300 difference only paintball has answered my thread if i get anymore advice will let you know as answers for some of us on this forum are few and far between.Was yours a big difference in money? If it is just the default and you are not in great need for the mone I would press them for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sowerby, the contractual interest came to £1700 nearly as all the charges were 2001/2. The claim was for just over £2k. So £1400 different to their offer.

 

I checked their figures which didn't include contractual and they calculated 8% court interest at just £58 since 2002. Even on the basic non-contractual spreadsheet it comes to nearly £200

 

So their £140 short of a normal settlement with just 8% stat anyway plus with the £214 they have paid to the closed account, the claim is short over £300 of the standard fees plus 8% claim.

 

I'd happily forget the contractual but Im not getting skanked on the court interest AND the default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i think they may come to a mid way settlement as i rang them and they said i had to put in writng to them that i was not happy with the payment.So dont write anything off yet try sending them a letter i am going to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

rockinrodders, stick to your guns about the default, do not accept any money and if they send a cheque return it, tell them the default is linked to your claim and you will only stop the claim when they have done so, make sure you get everything in writing. They will remove it, I got mine removed plus the late markers on my credit file, my hubby also got his removed. As for your offer letter, I am afraid it is the same one I got. Two months after I refused their offer I did eventually manage to get them to enter into a dialogue, at the moment they have offered another £200 as a GOGW.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Doo, I have written a rejection letter and told them to try again. I'll send it tomorrow. I told them politely to check their sums as well, as the 8% stat they offered instead was even wrong, not that I'd be taking it anyway!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I Returned the AQ to the court last week. Court manager said it was business as usual and hadn't heard of any cases being stayed there because of the OFT case.

 

Cap One entered a defence which had been cut and paste from another case. the amounts were wrong, even the claim amount etc.

 

They then went on to say they were defending on the basis that the case had been settled in full.

 

It was probably the right defence but for the wrong case.

 

I rejected the offer weeks ago anyway as they cut me short, they offered charges plus purchase but only £53 for stat 8% interest. The spreadsheet worked out stat 8% as £180.

 

Also the amount they said they had paid me was £250 more than the cheque that they sent because they had offset the rest against the partially settled account. I have a letter from them proving that the account had no outstanding balance and that no payments were outstanding because a few weeks ago I called someone else at Cap one and asked for a letter saying to confirm this. I received a letter from them saying:

 

Thank you for contacting us about the default that we've recorded on your credit file.

 

This default is recorded as satisfied, which means that no further payments are due. This willl remain on your credit file for 6 years from the date of the default. blah blah blah

 

Anyway, I returned the AQ to the court and asked the court to strike out the defence on grounds of abuse of process due to the fact that they couldn't be bothered to write a defence specific to the case. I also included the documents showing the correct amount of the claim, the actual amount of the cheque they sent none of which tallied with their paperwork.

 

I wrote back to Cap One as well and enclosed a copy of the AQ and restated that I had rejected their offer as it had cut me short £150 on interest and £250 paid into the closed account because they had admitted there was no payments due on the account in which they had offset it.

 

I said that if they corrected that and removed the default we had a deal, if not its up to the judge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok... well done. The default has to be completly removed with no trace at all. Keep us posted.

 

Uk

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I received a letter from the court last week with another AQ form attached, requesting a £100 AQ fee. I had already paid this and sent the form back weeks ago, the letter was dated 12th August but not received till about the 23rd. I called the court and told them I had already paid and returned and they agreed. They said my original was in their office being typed up when it should have been in front of the judge, so the letter was sent out automatically but now my case cannot go in to be allocated by the judge until the 6th September as he does it monthly.

 

Should I be sending nudge letters to Cap One or just wait for the court to set a court date?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Called the court again to chase it up today and they reckoned they had not got my AQ and the judge had ordered the case to be struck out if it was not received. I said that they had cashed my cheque back in August and that they had confirmed receipt 2 weeks ago. Then she checked the system and realised that they had received my AQ back at the start of August but it had been lost in their office whilst being typed up. She apologised and asked me to send her another copy. I sent that today and she promised to put it in front of the judge tomorrow.

 

She said Cap One had still not sent theirs in despite the judge giving them an extra month to do so and sending them a reminder, so hopefully they'll accept my request for judgement by default.

 

I did speak to somebody from Cap One, who phoned after I emailed them. They agreed that their calculations were wrong as I pointed out. They agreed to increase the settlement to include this and to include the removal or all adverse information including the default.

 

I told them I needed a cheque in my hand and a written confirmation of the default removal before telling the court they had paid up.

 

If they me mess about, I'll keep pushing for the default judgement as that includes contrctual interest and not just the purchase we agreed on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bob, The request for judgement form was on the bottom of the notice of issue I got right at the start of the court case.

 

The lady at the court told me this was fine. She was putting my case before the judge today. Hope he accepts my directions to throw out the defence for failing to return their documents despite being given a months extension.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...