Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Before 6 years ?


kathh
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6080 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is probably a stab in the dark, but I know people who have won with personnal accounts.

 

Can I do anything with a Business Account which ceased 6 years ago ?

 

I started my Company in 1995, my Company earned a lot of money quickley (which was my downfall), and in 2001 I became bankcrupt because of ill advice and a downturn in trading.

 

It has all been finalised now but I am interested the in amount of charges that were put on me during the latter part of my Companies life.

 

Can I ask for statement going further than the 6 years ?

 

Will being previously bankrupt affect any claim if I have one ?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I`m attempting to go back as far as poss with a personnal account started 1983. not heard anything yet, but you should be able to access your info on the same terms I would assume. The person to help you would be scotty, he`s been there and done it, (read his thread, its a must!) if not nattie will have the info you need. This site has all you need, just ask.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kath, welcome on board the nat west forum.

 

I can probably shed a little light on this one for you. If you became bankrupt in 2001, any potential claim on bank charges incurred up to the date of the bankruptcy are ultimately classed as your 'assets' at the time of the bankruptcy - even though they were unrealised. As such, they 'belong' to your creditors.

 

However, as your bankruptcy was six years ago, I really do think you should contact the Official Receiver who dealt with your bankruptcy to ascertain what your outstanding debts were at that time. If the charges you incurred were more than the outstanding debts, you should definitely try to reclaim them. Also, given the time lapse between the bankruptcy and now, I also feel it's worthwhile getting some specialist advice if possible - as it may well be that you have something to gain here.

 

Good luck, hedgey xxx :p

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest, I went Bankcrupt for a lot of ££££'s .

 

A lot more than I was overcharged, but I am more annoyed at the Banks misadvice as to what type of account I should have been in (as awell my Accountants lack of advice).

 

In all honesty, I was not looked after properly and I didn't help myself either.

 

I think it's a case of you learn something every day.

 

And I've learnt and have come out of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is probably a stab in the dark, but I know people who have won with personnal accounts.

 

Can I do anything with a Business Account which ceased 6 years ago ?YES

 

I started my Company in 1995, my Company earned a lot of money quickley (which was my downfall), and in 2001 I became bankcrupt because of ill advice and a downturn in trading.

 

It has all been finalised now but I am interested the in amount of charges that were put on me during the latter part of my Companies life.

 

Can I ask for statement going further than the 6 years ? YES

 

Will being previously bankrupt affect any claim if I have one ?

 

Thanks

 

 

hI

 

CLAIM CLAIM CLAIM

 

gO GET YOUR MONEY LOOK AT CONTRACTURAL INTEREST

 

Im sending u a PM

 

scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NATTIE

I am not allowed to quote/paraphrase on how far back statement and charges history natwest have as i could be in breach of the computer misuse act 1990,(i believe). So 1991 the data is some form exists.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting cold feet

 

I'm not sure, but think I have all my accounts from 1995-2001 in my loft. I kept them while I closed the Company and went into bankcruptcy incase I needed them.

 

Planning on buying a torch this weekend and seeing if I have the statetments.

 

Not sure what to do, not sure If it's best to leave sleeping dogs lie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will deffinately see if I've got the statements in the loft but not sure what I'll do.

 

A bit complicated, the Company was a Partnership.

 

Although we left on great terms, we have drifted apart and havn't spoken for while, which happens in life.

 

I would deffinately contact the other Partner before starting the claim.

 

What would happen if I/We did get paid out, would it be paid to the Company name which no longer trades ?

 

If so, how do you then cash the cheque ? ( I still get a statement from another account which says the Compay has £10.xx in it, which I don't know what to do with.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will deffinately see if I've got the statements in the loft but not sure what I'll do.

 

A bit complicated, the Company was a Partnership. 1 partner can claim as long as he/she was a cheque signatory

 

Although we left on great terms, we have drifted apart and havn't spoken for while, which happens in life.

 

I would deffinately contact the other Partner before starting the claim.

 

What would happen if I/We did get paid out, would it be paid to the Company name which no longer trades ? it can be paid to a signatory IE MR J Bloggs

 

If so, how do you then cash the cheque ? ( I still get a statement from another account which says the Compay has £10.xx in it, which I don't know what to do with.)

or pay it into this account then transfer it then close the account

It is worth while reclaiming

uve got nothing to lose but plenty to win

Scott

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kath, before you take any steps at all to reclaim your bank charges, please contact the Official Receiver for full and accurate advice. The rules for bankrupts/discharged bankrupts are completely different - and I only know this because my husband is a discharged bankrupt.

 

I'd really hate you to go through the hassle of reclaiming only to find that you have to hand the money over to the Official Receiver/outstanding creditors if you win. It may be that after all this time you can keep the cash - but you must check with the OR first, particularly as you went bankrupt under the old rules.

 

Please contact them urgently before taking this any further - I know I seem cautious, but it's the best thing to do right now.

 

Good luck, hedgey xx :p

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NATTIE

I think you need to heed Hedgey's advice rather then maybe the bullish(ie vitriolic go for it) words that is on here. I have seen this advice and would hate you to go to all the expenses of a sar to find that you cannot claim. As Hedgey has advised PLEASE contact the Official Receiver.

 

HEDGEY HAS YOUR INTERESTS AT HEART. Once you have please post on here and we can offer all the advice if the Official Receiver states you can go ahead.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But bankruptcy affects you for several years after you've been discharged. It's not a simple case as closing a file - you must know this yourself having been through the process?

 

And regardless of whether the file was closed, at the time you was declared bankrupt your potential claim on the outstanding charges was a potential 'asset' to be distributed to your creditors. Just because the claim was not pursued at the time, it is still classed as an asset.

 

To not inform the OR fully before you claim and/or during the claim could be viewed as with-holding information which could have quite serious consequences for you.

 

The chances are that after all this time, you may be able to keep any reclaimed bank charges. However, YOU MUST CONTACT THE OR. I'D ALSO STRONGLY ADVISE YOU TO CONTACT A SPECIALIST BANKRUPTCY PRACTITIONER TO OBTAIN THE CORRECT LEGAL STANCE ON THIS AS WELL. I personally feel you need some qualified advice on this.

 

Best of luck, hedgey.

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, finally I went in to the loft to look for Bank Statements.

 

Without going into any great detail, I guess between 1999 to 2001 I (we) were charged over £3,000 in Cheque Returned Fee's and Unpaid Cheque Fee's (that's without the 8% interest before going to Court).

 

Still abit unsure about letting sleeping dogs lie etc.

 

Have contacted my long and distant Business Patner (who went the IVA way) and they are happy for me to pursue matters.

 

About myself, I do not work or claim benefits, just look after the kids now and have been Discharged from Bankruptcy since 2005.

 

I do not feel worried about the Official Receiver but am more worried about going through the process and it being a waste of time.

 

My main queries are :

 

Will the Banks pay out back to 1999 ?

 

If they do pay out, how do I get payment to me and not the Company which dosn't exist anymore and at my home address and not the previous business address?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I can't believe it, finally went through the process of sending the prelim letters and lba, I was due to use MCOL this weekend when I received an offer of £654 (claim is £3,900) on Thursday as a gesture of goodwill.

 

Now with the High Courts ruling this week I don't know what to do.

 

I really need the money and would have probably borrowed the money to pay MCOL but am now tempted by the offer.

 

Is there any way I can word the letter of accepting the offer as only part acceptance but want the rest or I'll go to Court.

 

Also, at this stage is it worth spending £200 going through MCOL with whats going on.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

there's a template letter in the step by step insturction to accept a part settlement but continue with the claim but if it's NW, they aren't going to pay the offer out unless you accept it as a settlement

 

the advice re the OFT is continue your claim

 

your decision whether to settle, normally I'd say continue with the claim, you should get all of it eventually

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice, I think I will borrow the money to pay for MCOL and hope for the best.

 

I am looking at trying to claim for another account, but in the current situation, I would like to ask for advice. Can you please advise me if it's worth trying to claim for a new claim.

 

1) Can I still ask for 6 years statements (S,A.R.) ?

2) Do I still go through the Prelim and LBA process's ?

3) If it gets to MCOL stage, is it worth paying/pursuing ?

4) If it gets to Court stage, is it worth paying, will it happen or be stayed ?

 

Ultimately, I don't know whether to start a new claim.

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the advice when claiming against NatWest is to use the N1 form rath3er than MCOL, MCOl only allows a shortened POC, you have to post SOC anyway so might as well do the N1 with a proper POC

 

I don't understand the second claim, is it for another account with NW?

 

If so the SAR should ask for your entire banking history, ie all accounts although you should specify the account numbers, then you can claim them all at the same time on the same claim, I'm claiming three accounts on one of my claims, it might be worth delaying the first claim and starting it again when you have all the statements for NW, you wouldn't have to stump up for two sets of court fees and possibly two sets of AQ fees

 

if the second account is with another bank then it has to be done all over again and separately

 

no-one's sure yet about the OFT case, the official advice is to proceed with claims, NW especially will not settle until you have a court dat and the court date is real soon, they might make you and offer before that but not for more than a third of your claim tops

Link to post
Share on other sites

Previous advice still stands............. I hope you've contacted the Official Receiver with regards to the bank charges on the account that was included in the bankruptcy. You may come unstuck if you haven't and it may not be worth trying to find the cash to file your claim via MCOL.

 

I'll back out at this stage. Best of luck. :)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

After the offer of £654 on 29th July (claim which will end up nearer £5,500 after interest if I took it to Court and won, which is doubtfull at the moment), I received another letter from them today with the same offer and the same 8 weeks to reply.

 

I have been keeping an eye on threads to see if I should pay the £250 to go to Court as at the moment it dosn't seem worth it as it looks like it would be Stayed anyway. And was going to leave it untill the last minute to decide.

 

I presume now I have another 8 weeks to decide (if I can afford the wait) just incase something changes over the next 2 months ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can only go to court to recover a loss that you've actually suffered. If the whole bank account was written off when you went bankrupt then preumably you didn't actually pay the charges, i.e. they just got added to an overdraft that as ultimately written off as part of the sequestration. The fact that they haven't upped their offer suggests that they are perfectly well aware of the situation and are just waiting to get you into court... I think you can expect a pretty hard time from the judge - with negligeable chances of getting any actual cash - if you proceed with court action on this. :(

After the offer of £654 on 29th July (claim which will end up nearer £5,500 after interest if I took it to Court and won, which is doubtfull at the moment), I received another letter from them today with the same offer and the same 8 weeks to reply.

 

I have been keeping an eye on threads to see if I should pay the £250 to go to Court as at the moment it dosn't seem worth it as it looks like it would be Stayed anyway. And was going to leave it untill the last minute to decide.

 

I presume now I have another 8 weeks to decide (if I can afford the wait) just incase something changes over the next 2 months ?

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice, but surely If it did ever eventually get to Court It would get Stayed anyway.

 

And In the event of US ALL WINNING it would just be a mass payout without questions asked ?

 

And If questions were asked, could I not say that the charges that were made were their part of me going into Bankruptcy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...