Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Too strange to be a co-incidence?


djdave
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6113 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm helping my other half reclaim her charges from Capital One, and also asking them to consider temporarily lowering her repayments for a while.

 

To their credit, they're actually being reasonable, but that's another story.

 

What's strange is that we've not had any kind of junk mail for years, and yet since we started dealing with Cap One she's had mailshots from Yes Loans and (today) Debt Reducers.

 

I can't find anything which links them with each other, nor with Cap One, but it just seems very odd that the moment we start tackling her finances we start getting junk mail from these parasites.

 

Now of course I'm not making any allegations (!) but would be interested in people's comments.

 

:)

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did she tick or cross the "don't send me any marketing stuff and don't pass my details on to any of your associates" box when she applied for her credit card? If she never it may be that they then pass the info on, I always try and tick or cross the boxes when I apply for anythings, also a member of the mail preference service which cuts junk mail down :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure in this case, but we're in MPS and both routinely tick the "no junk" boxes.

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

djdave, I got a CCJ in late 2005, had I have not been so ill I could probably have stopped it...but thats another story! Anyway about 2 weeks after the CCJ being granted (if thats the word!) I started getting a constant stream of loan offers from companies I'd never heard of...they all referred to bad credit history, etc...and were all addressed to me personally...Ms Zimmie @ your address. I have always been convinced this stream of 'generous' offers was connected to my CCJ. In an effort to stop this unsolicited mail I registered with the Mailing Preference Service, I have since still had a few. I used to rip my name & addy off & put them in the recycling bin. I have now decided to keep anymore and send them to MPS with a complaint.

I strongly suspect that details of my CCJ have been viewed by disreputable finance companies, who have decided that they can help me in my unfortunate circumstances :rolleyes:

I totally agree with you djdave...it seems very suspicious!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm helping my other half reclaim her charges from Capital One, and also asking them to consider temporarily lowering her repayments for a while.

 

To their credit, they're actually being reasonable, but that's another story.

 

What's strange is that we've not had any kind of junk mail for years, and yet since we started dealing with Cap One she's had mailshots from Yes Loans and (today) Debt Reducers.

 

I can't find anything which links them with each other, nor with Cap One, but it just seems very odd that the moment we start tackling her finances we start getting junk mail from these parasites.

 

Now of course I'm not making any allegations (!) but would be interested in people's comments.

 

:)

 

Yes it is rather bizarre.

 

I too get letters offering me loans, car HP all sort of things to get me further into debt. Now, how do they know i am having money troubles? This information can only come from the banks / credit cards. Nobody else knows about my situation! When i was ok financially, like you, i never got bothered.

 

What my intention is now is to try and find out where these lenders got my details from, when i find out they have come from the bank or credit card co.s there will probably be hell to pay!

 

That is one thing i implicity said to the banks and credit cards companies DO NOT share my information with others.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ian cognito

This IS strange, I have paid off my Cap One credit cards and have since stopped getting junk mail from them, I am not in any arrears with any payments, nor am I overdrawn at the bank, however, since I started claiming back my bank charges, I have had loads of junk mail from loan and debt companies???

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Sorry to drag up an old thread, but I have a question.

 

Anybody who also received junk mail offering loans while they were dealing with their creditors, please try and remember if you had applied for a credit report in the weeks previously.

 

If so, could you post your experiences here. And have a look at the thread below - it's possible that there's a link.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/112671-r-subject-access-request.html

 

:)

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

A couple of years ago I worked in the accounts of a firm and they dealt with buying and selling marketing address lists. As others have advised join the mail preference service (telephone preference service also available) and if any slip through the net either forward to mps or strike through your name and address writing RETURN TO SENDER and put back in postbox, it will cost them and then they will manually remove your details from their lists (which they sell) so it doesn't cost them again as the letters are returned to them and not their clients.

I love CAG!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...