Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Don't think there is an earnings reporting form online. There is a website to report changes link below https://www.gov.uk/carers-allowance-report-change
    • Savers who rushed to open Santander's 5.2% easy-access account in September will see the rate on their account drop from Monday.View the full article
    • OpenAI and Reddit reach deal that will give ChatGPT access to content on the social media platform.View the full article
    • Even if that was not a PCN on your car, can you still swear that a PCN was not placed on your car ? NO Even if they showed you a copy of the PCN they sent, can you still wear that they actually sent the first PCN to you? NO Why are still quibbling  when the real argument is why they have broken the Act by telling you that you hadn't paid when in reality they shouldn't have sent that letter out probably until Monday which  would have been deemed received  on Wednesday? If you are that bothered about it, just leave out the start about the windscreen ticket since it isn't why you are complaining.
    • I am sorry that you have come across excel -possibly the most inhumane of all the rogues that ruin parking in private car parks. i am more sorry that I have missed your thread until now. As I understand it, their artic. was parked in front of their parking sign and the Blue badge places forcing you to stop somewhere else in the car park to observe the rules. On realising that even the Blue badge places were paid places and that you did not have the correct coinage you quite rightly decided to leave. Thus you had read their terms and until you have read them and signified your acceptance by either paying or staying, you are not classed as being parked.  You have a MINiMUM of five minutes  leave. Sadly Excel do not understand any words greater than two syllables which is where their problems start. Their greed, ignorance, inhumanity, etc etc all carry on from there. However they do know that Judges do understand what minimum means and are well aware of the Equality Act  so I wouldn't be too worried about what excel  will do. Plus we still have to see their PCN and when it comes to producing a Notice that complies with the Act relating to private car parks they do not excel at that. I hope that the Iceland MD will cancel the ticket. You still have a couple of other routes you could try. The first one is your Member of Parliament will probably be happy to help as they will need all the votes they can get with an election looming. Plus your local newspaper may also pitch in after hearing your story to go after Iceland and excel. [You may notice I have not merite them with a capital E as it is definitely undeserved.]
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

benjfrst V Lloyds


benjfrst
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6231 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, new on this forum but havent felt the need to post till just now as there is so much good information here, thanks for letting me be a silent participant until now.

 

I am currently at the stage of Litigation, and lloyds have until the 5th of may to acknowledge my claim.

 

my very recent problem i have is

 

1) I went 1.25 over my authorised overdraft limit on the 12th of april but i was 461 pound in credit on the 13th of april after getting paid. I was 1.25 other my authorised limit for less than 24 hours and I have now been charged a penalty of 30 pounds

 

2) On friday the 20th of april Lloyds were unable to make a standing order that i set up online because i wasnt paid on this day (i know i can claim this back from my employer but bare with me) I have now recieved another penalty of 35 pound for this.

 

 

Now am I completly P!ssed off about this.

 

1) how can they jusify a penalty of 30 pounds for a 1.25 slip up on the wrong side of my overdraft?

 

2) I set this standing order online to pay into my dads account, no other company is involved, there is nothing on my statement to say the bank attempted to make the standing order, i only made the standing order because it was easier to do then to write a cheque, I cant possibly see why they would have to charge 35 pounds for not making it, would they charge you 35 pounds to attempt to make a cash withdrawl at the cash machine of money you didnt have? no you'll just get a 'sorry you dont have sufficent funds'

 

I have rang customer services and they refuse to waiver the charges. Even after I explained the frankly shocking nature of circumstances and that I have just started a litigation against them.

 

I simply cannot afford to have 65 pound stolen off me at this time. (It will take a coupe of weeks to process my complaint through my employers to get my 35 pound back)

 

The charges will be TAKEN from my account at the beginning of May.

 

No what I am planning to do is close this account of Friday.

 

What I hope somone can help me with is will this affect my current case against lloyds, and can you see them refusing to close the account whilst these charges are unpaid? This is what the woman at customer services suggested!?

 

They will have to sue me to get that money there is no way on this earth I am paying more charges!!

 

Please help any adice welcome and I will promise to be more vocal from now on and contribute to this great forum:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Benjfrst, not much help now, but if you had done a bank transfer, you do it on the day you choice when there is money in the account.

They can't justify there charge's which is why we are claiming them!

Have you opened another account? I can not see LTSB letting you close an account which as far as they are concerned you owe money on,:rolleyes: even if someone on the phone did suggest it.

open another account have everything transferred to it leave nothing in the LTSB account and go from there.

I don't beleive it will have any effect on your current claim,( no doubt I will be corrected by someone with more knowledge than myself if I am wrong, but that is what this site is about:D ).

Hope I have been some help.

Read read and read some:p more

Happy claiming

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your reply, i do have another account with barclays which i have never actually used but it is still current.

 

I can switch over everthyhing fairly easy and leave a balance of zero but if i dont close the account down Im sure they will just dip into my overdraft to take the charges out. At a loss of what to do now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK benjfrst, I know for a fact they will not close the account till all monies owed have been paid:( transfer all credits etc to your barclays account NOW, and request the od is taken off, no longer needed. this has no effect on your case, once they take the charges you start over again reclaiming them:D then you pay that in and close the account.

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...