Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Like
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6213 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone, I could do with your help and support please.

 

I am in a situation where I feel powerless, intimidated and depressed.

 

I was moved into temporary accommodation approx 4 years ago (May 2003). My wife, daughter (1) and I were moved from my parent’s house approximately 15 miles away into another borough where we had no family or friends for support.

 

The tenancy was in my wife’s name and I completed a housing benefit form in front of the rent officer who took it away. 5 months later my family was being evicted due to no form being received. I made a complaint at stage 1 which was upheld and apologies were made as my case was incorrectly closed and files were misplaced.

 

Approximately 9 months later from the beginning of the tenancy, I completed another assessment and this was acknowledged 1 year later!! However no rent had changed although my full time income was fluctuating and increasing year on year. I did not think anything of it, I was under a lot of pressure and my wife had just been diagnosed with a terminal illness.

 

After 2 ½ years into the tenancy I was asked to send further pay slips and further copies of tax credit awards which had already been sent in over the past months. After sending these into the housing office a letter was sent to my address requesting an overpayment of approx. £14k. I was furious and angry and frustrated. In the letter they state that due to not declaring my income until 2 ½ years later the benefit was reassessed and that I had been overpaid.

 

I sent in letters requesting an appeal and also a letter explaining all the information that I had sent in with dates and copies of correspondence. After my wife had died last year a friend spoke with someone at the council to inform them that I could not contact them at this time. A year later which was last week, I was sent 3 separate invoices that looked identical to the 14k but totalled approx £500. I sent in these invoices and asked for clarification.

 

They replied to my query by sending me the original 3 invoices for £14k.

 

I feel that I should not have to pay this debt as it was an error on their part and I made the council fully aware of my circumstances and so they should be held fully responsible for this overpayment.

 

My intentions are to ask for a complete breakdown and complain to the chief exec and then to the LA ombudsman.

 

I would be grateful for any advice!!

 

Thanks

 

Leo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome,

i think you will be best off sending a dpa sar to the council quoting your ref number and enclosing a £10 cheque.

They will have to by law give you all the details they have on you over the last 6 yrs.

I would also see a solicitor if you can, the first half hour is free, if you dont know one contact the CAB for one.

Good luck!

See if reading this thread helps?

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bailiffs/78406-housing-benefit-bailiffs.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act. It costs £10 in the form of a cheque or postal order, and entitles you to every single item of data that the council hold about you personally, including in your case a list of payments, any previous complaints/mistakes made, notes on your account written by the account operatives...you need to send it Special Delivery, to ensure that it's signed for. They have 40 calendar days to reply.

There's a link here to the basic one used for banks. You just need to change the details to suit your situation, and substitute the account numbers for your reference number.

Good luck; come back when you receive a response.

  • Haha 1

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The tenancy was under my late wife's name but also signed by myself. Documents used to come in my wifes name but now come in my name. Will this mean that they will only give me documents with my name on it?

 

leo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Leo,

 

Re: Housing benefit.

 

If the overpayment is substantial, and resulted from the local authority incorrectly assessing accurate information provided by a person, s/he could argue that, given her/his lack of understanding of how benefit is calculated, s/he could not reasonably have been expected to notice the error. A judicial review (R. v Liverpool City Council ex parte Griffiths, March 14 1990) of a local authority's attempt to recover an overpayment ruled that it was not recoverable because it was not reasonable to expect the claimant to work out her housing benefit entitlement. Such arguments may be strengthened by reference to the quality of the information provided by the local authority to the client about her/his benefit, and/or the client's difficulties in understanding the information.

 

As you had much going on in your life and the local authority were made aware of this, I as you would approach the local authority ombudsman regarding this. You have tried to deal directly with the L A but they have failed you. I would also complain to the L A using their complaints procedure quoting 'maladministration' and 'standards of service'. The L A will know what you mean when you use these terms. Also include as much evidence as possible including photocopies of letters etc if you have them. Looks like you have grounds for challenging this decision.

 

Good luck.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your advice! I have sent off letters today to the Chief executive of the LA demanding that the debt is written off due to maladministration of officers and negligence. Copies have also gone to local MP and departments. I have given 14 days for response and then i will pursue further with LA Ombudsman.

 

I have also sent off for the DPA!

 

I will get back to you with the outcome!

 

thanks again everyone!!

 

Leo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all

 

Progress so far!!

 

£10 returned to me for the DPA, been informed by letter not required for this service as they do not charge.

 

Dated 25/04/07 sent a final reminder for the overpayment of 11k (1 of 3 invoices totalling 14k) to be paid else legal action will be taken!!

 

Letter Dated 26/04/07 from Office of Chief Executive who replied that reply will be given within 15 days and passed onto stage 2 of complaints procedure.

 

Dated 26/04/07 letter informing me that a reply will be given by 17th May and being dealt with at stage 1 of complaints by senior officer.

 

Abit confused as to what is going on but seems that there is no communication between departments as decisions are being made that seem inconsistent and letters are being sent out without knowledge of what is going on with my case. I have already made a complaint at stage 1 although i could not respond to their letter at the time. Is my first complaint void due to no response??

 

DO I need to contact overpayments team and tell them or should they not know that a complaint is being dealt with??

 

Leo

Link to post
Share on other sites

They should know, but it might be worthwhile phoning them anyway - you can't always rely on the left hand knowing what the right is doing under these circumstances.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...