Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi All. A family friends car was having issues when she was on a trip visiting family up north at the begining of January.  She ended up leaving it at my friends garage in the same location, who parked it on his forecourt to investigate the issue, howver he said most likely it is beyond economical repair as its a serious gearbox fault. In the meantime i replaced her car with one of my spare cars. The insurance on the car then expired in at the end of January.  When the insurance expired, I sent a paper V890 paper as i didnt have her V5 Reference number in hand to do it online (i have a copy of this).  She didnt mention she hadnt recieved any confirmation as she didnt know if she would get one.  She then cancelled her road tax at the end of March (i think) as she was paying by DD. She then was travelling up north so didnt get her ,ail until last week. She recievd a letter dated 09/04/2024 stating she had failed to insure the vehcile and there was a £100 fine which could be reduced to £50 if she respons by 11/05/2024.  As soon as we noticed, i got her to dig  out the V5 and SORN'd the vehicle.   My friend has been a bit slow in checking the fault, however i suspect it will still be scrapped and is still on his forecourt. Is this possible to appeal?
    • worthy to not forget Just to let you know this bunch Kensington have been fined £1.225m by the financial regulator for treating borrowers who were in arrears unfairly. Claim those charges back plus the interest and tell them not to add any more to the account. There are a few news stories here you can get the info for a letter to send to them. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8615870.stm  
    • Hi All. I went to visit a family friend in Rochdale on a new housing estate opposite a old row of houses. The location is Royle Road, Postcode OL11 3PE. I was originally parked in parking bays outside the old houses, then moved the car, when I noticed my tyre was flat, so parked on what looked like double yellows to use his air pump to check and inflate the tyres before we left the house.   In the time i went inside to sort the pump and power supply i got a PCN.  The tyre then got changed (has a puncture) and we left. PCN Number:         RE######## Date:             04/05/2024 Time:             20:36 Observation:         20:34 to 20:36 Reported location:     Royle Park Road Reason:        Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (Code: 01) I believe this PCN is not correct and has grounds to appeal: 1. My friend who moved into the property around 6 months ago, swears that even though it has old double yellows marked, they are not current or council marked.   He said the property development company had said they had marked them for ease of access during development. 2. The road i was parked on was Royle Road.  The PCN was issued for Royle Park Road, which is about 400 yards up the road. 3. There are no sign posts or marking showing parking  restriction hours in the entire area (there maybe on Royle park Road). I have attached a map of the Location where i parked as a red dot. I have 2 questions: a.  Is there a way to check where double yellow lines are marked on some register to check if they are current? b. Can my grounds of appeal simply be, wrong location, wrong offence? Thanks in advance. Map_20240505.pdf
    • you made it very confusing, though i doubt any of it was ever read by the delivery franchise for DPD. your saving grace might well be you didn't select your own address (though if you are all the same postcode..??) and neither mentioned a safe space other than another neighbour. but with the actual delivery address on the parcel, it appears the driver had a choice of 3 addresses, all under the same post code with differing house numbers. so chose the label one but left it on your doorstep. play it carefully and along with the photo and the retailers requirement you should be ok.   dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

My Capital One/Bryan Carter CCJ......


Vampyra
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5025 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I spoke to the court this morning about who to send the letter to regarding this CCJ and the lady in the court was very abrupt. When I told her I had proof and would send that in that we paid it on 15th September she said "oh we don't look at your proof we ask the solicitors who will give us an accurate assessment of what was paid and by whom. If they never sent you a certificate of satsfaction it's probably because you never paid. We only accept confirmation of payment from the solicitors as defendants have been known to doctor documents incorrectly stating they paid when they didn't".

 

I'm gobsmacked! 80

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I can't find out anything about this Bryan Carter outfit.

 

I would complain to anyone who might be interested.

 

Nitrous Oxide has posted saying they claim a small portion of the outstanding balance in CCJ action to recover their fee, which is very interesting as it connects to what we discussed before.

 

They claim only a small portion of the debt thereby recovering their fee. By submitting to this claim as many do, you acknowledge existence and liabilbity of the debt without determining ownership, thereby allowing the legal owner to revive the claim at a later date, and there's not a thing you can do about it. Stitched up like a kipper.

 

Clever one!!!!

 

 

Sorry to bump an old thread, I have only just seen this!

This has recently happened to me! I defaulted on a Kays catalogue debt, and in June this year, I got a court letter, filed by Brian Carter solicitors.

I am asking the court to lower the amount they wanted (£50 a month)I am a single parent on benefits and no way can I afford that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They claim only a small portion of the debt thereby recovering their fee. By submitting to this claim as many do, you acknowledge existence and liabilbity of the debt without determining ownership, thereby allowing the legal owner to revive the claim at a later date, and there's not a thing you can do about it. Stitched up like a kipper.

 

 

This has been quoted around CAG on many occasions but I believe it is wrong.

If BC claims for part of the debt they are not claiming for their fees (although court fees and solicitors fees may be added to amount claimed). I'm not sure what you mean by 'submitting to this claim' - are you suggesting that if you don't defend it you acknowledge the existence of the debt? That is one conclusion but not the only one.

If you have judgment awarded against you for part of the claim the original creditor cannot 'revive the claim' for the remainder at a later date as that would be in direct contravention of S35 of the County Courts Act.

County Courts Act 1984 (c. 28) - Statute Law Database

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I wanted to add to this as I am going through the process of trying to get the CCJ removed.

 

I have sent an explanitory letter to the court telling them about the circumstances around the CCJ, that my defence was never shown to the court and that the CCJ was paid 3 days before the deadline. Plus it would appear from an SAR that Cap 1 never received any payment from Bryan Carter and Co and are now trying to chase me via Lowells for the debt.

 

The letter and evidence of payment arrived at the court and they sent it to BC. The court told me if BC agree it was paid they will mark it on my credit file as inactive - it's currently showing as active and has been for over 3 years!

 

However, they said if BC tell them it wasn't paid, they will not mark it as paid, even though they have evidence it was paid.

 

I would then have to fill in an N441 for the case to be reviewed. I would again have to supply evidence and ask for a judge to assess the case.

 

I will be writing to Cap1 for a definative answer as to whether they received any monies from BC and to also inform them they cannot claim for the rest of the debt as BC had claimed for part and you are not allowed two bites at the cherry.

 

I will take this all the way and may even consider, if appropriate claiming compensation for the CCJ being left on my credit file as Active for over 3yrs. If it gets removed I might go for compensation for it being on my file for 3 years!

 

I don't expect it to be easy but I'm gonna give it a good bloody go!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi,

 

I have been reading through the theads on Bryan Carter with interest, they are trying to take my husband to court next week... so I am about to send the CCA request letter...

 

But on another note, I have a CCJ for £125 for a Kays Catalogue dept that Bryan Carter chased fortunately this has been 6 years and is now not shown, but by your threads it seems highly likely that was Bryan Carter recovering their costs... are they allowed to apply a CCJ to your name under your creditor?:Cry:

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I have been reading through the theads on Bryan Carter with interest, they are trying to take my husband to court next week... so I am about to send the CCA request letter...

 

But on another note, I have a CCJ for £125 for a Kays Catalogue dept that Bryan Carter chased fortunately this has been 6 years and is now not shown, but by your threads it seems highly likely that was Bryan Carter recovering their costs... are they allowed to apply a CCJ to your name under your creditor?:Cry:

 

Thanks again

Hi,

You will get a better response if you start a new thread or PM a mod to move the post for you.

You ideally need to send a CPR letter as it's now in court. How long a go did you take the card out. Have you ever CCA'd them before and got a reply?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
Oh yes I also found a letter from BC after the ruling saying I had to start paying installments of £250 per month - which was not the case. All evidence I feel.

 

I also sense an SAR to BC coming on! ;)

 

Bumped a very old thread, sorry. But wanted to ask Vampyra how she got on with this? Did you ever get the CCJ removed? Am in a similar situation so would be good to know. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...