Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Data Protection Act charge info request


plasticpaddy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6309 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just phoned up First Direct and asked for:-

a) the rate card for charges (I couldn't find it on the site).

b) a list of my charges between Jan2000 and Dec2003 (I have the rest).

 

The FD guy didn't know anything and couldn't even find the info of charge costs on his own website, so a [free] leaflet of the fees is being sent in the post.

 

He also had to ask somebody else (his boss?) about my Data Protection request who replied by fobbing me off with the line that I would be charged for any "duplicate statement requests".

 

I argued that I was only requesting personal information as was my right under the Data Protection Act and that they couldn't charge me for that info and that this was NOT a request for duplicate statements.

 

They disagreed and told me to write into Customer Services and complain. So here is the draft of my letter:-

 

---------------------------------------------

 

Customer Relations Manager

first direct

40 Wakefield Road

Leeds

LS98 1FD

 

Data Protection Act disclosure request

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER:

Sort Code:

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Please supply me with a list of bank charges applied to my bank account between January 2000 and December 2003. This should include all occasions where I have been charged for exceeding an overdraft limit and/or excess overdraft limit, for ‘bouncing’ a cheque and for the failure of a direct debit or standing order.

 

You have, according to the rules of the Data Protection Act as I have been advised of them, a period of 40 days in which to both acknowledge and act upon this request

 

Please not this is NOT a request for duplicate statements or correspondence of any sort. But a request for personal information (in the form of charges) only, and therefore under the provisions of the Act I cannot be charged for this service.

 

----------------------

 

More later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but they can charge you upto a maximum of £10

The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First Direct have just told me they are not obligated to give me this info.

 

I told them under the Data Protection Act that they are. Am now awaiting a call from a 'team leader'.

 

Obviously if they still refuse I will compain to the Information Commissioner’s Office.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An application form for this information has been sent to me in the post.

 

First Direct have confirmed the cost is £10, which is the maximum (suprise suprise) they can charge.

 

Have doublechecked that they are not also trying to charge me for the application form as well!!

 

More later

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just went along to a local HSBC branch and innocently asked for a printout of my statements. They replied they' could charge "£1 a page" but usually do it for free....

 

However I had to get First Direct to contact the branch directly so I could be identified properly (HSBC don't have my security details).

 

On Monday I'll pick up a copy of all my old statements for no cost.

 

This means I save the £10 Data Protection Act request fee as well as up to 40 days in time.

 

BTW a colleague of mine who is a HSBC customer went to another local branch and they printed out six years of his statements straight away. And again for free.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

I went to the Tsb on Friday and requested details of all charges on my account from Feb 01 to Dec 02 (that is when I closed my account), I was charged the maximum fee of £10 and was told the information would be forwarded to me.

I also went to Nationwide (I currently bank with them) and requested details of all charges on my account since it opened in Oct 02 I handed them my request letter and £10 fee and was told there was no charge for a printout of my charges, I asked the girl if she was absolutely certain and she said we charge for duplicate statements but not for a copy of a printout showing charges, she gave me back my £10. Is this a stalling procedure and will they ask at a later date for my £10 and start the 40 day response date start from then?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/06/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support their.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6309 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...