Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Alex the Lad v. Abbey


alex_the_lad
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5301 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi All - been following this thread with great interest!

 

With great respect to Alex, whose thread it is, I find this whole Abbey spreadsheet thing a great [problem] on their part to avoid giving out the full info required to put a full and formal Court claim together! On top of that I've just read todays OFT statement as per Julie's link (above), which seems to say that they're going to nothing quickly (for a multitude of reasons!). All of which seems to leave us - the long suffering customers - with ever greater problems to overcome in order to recover what is rightfully ours, and having to do so without the formal intervention of the OFT (at least in the short / medium term), which intervention we surely have a right to expect!

 

What is the point of the OFT if they are not going to react quickly and efficiently to what has now become a massive problem with this country's banking system??????????

I do my best to be helpful, but at the end of the day I'm not a professional - please seek further advice if you're not sure. On the other hand, if I have helped, please click my scales - thanks ;)

 

Current Claims (all for friends!) -

 

Abbey - over £4k - Court claim issued & AQ filed ('Tish vs Abbey'). Alloc'n Hearing 21 Sept - Claim stayed 29/8/07.

Cap One - just under £2k - WON (just over 2k!)('Tish vs Cap One')

Cap One - just under £1000 - WON (just over £1k) Nov 07 (JimmyBoy vs Cap One)

Lloyds TSB - £3.5k - Court claim issued, defence rec'd and AQ filed; Alloc'n hearing 7th Sept Claim stayed 29/8/07! (JimmyBoy vs Lloyds')

MBNA - over £1k for mis-sold PPI - WON - approx £1500(IpswichWitch vs MBNA . . .)

Link to post
Share on other sites

well folks , i too recieved the spreadsheet (jan 04 - dec 06) and its where most of my charges were taken.

i put them all on my summary using the 28th of each month as the date as this seems to be the date for nigh on the rest of them. ive just sent it off today . hope i havent dropped a clanger already ! :eek::confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said in my earlier post - although its fairly simple to estimate the date when the charges were taken, I am at a loss as to how to work out overdraft interest on charges when we do not know what the o/d balance was and how much interest was charged that month!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think abbey are up to something myself. I have been suspecting this for a while. (before starting my claim) I started all this before they started to send out these spread sheets. But when i recieved statements for last year. Januarys ones only added up to about 80 pounds. When my husband and i were in a branch for hours trying to sort out why we had called Abbey nearly everyday over the christmans period to see how much money we had in our account and everyday we were told we had some.Then we went massivley overdrawn. And between our joint account and his the charges were about £500 for that month alone!!! They told us they could only refund one charge every 6 months as a good will gesture! When the statements came through they weren't nearly that!!! But how do i prove it? and my husband has had LOADS of charges refunded on his account that he doesn't remember asking for!!

Sorry to hijack your thread but i thought it was relevant to what you were all saying.

What is going on at Abbey? I'd love to know!

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are running scared and taking a calculated gamble that if they refund enough charges most people wont bother chasing after them through the courts for the rest

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll second that.

 

I think they're beginning to lose the plot quite frankly, their behaviour is becoming even more inconsistent that it used to be. Sending 2 years on a spreadsheet when they know full well that's not compliant with a SAR. Maybe they hope nobody would notice :-D

 

Having said that, my local CC told me today that my case is being transferred to Leeds where there is a judge who does nothing but bank charges claims. Guess we're keeping him busy. ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, I too have just recieived my Abbey spreadsheet dated January 2004 - January 2006, and an accompanying letter from Pam Speed promising the last 14 months transactions within the next 5-7 days. Letter also states that anything prior to Jan 2004 will follow as soon as possible - I'll believe it when I see it. I'm not convinced though about the totals they've given as they seem a lot less than I thought they would be (about £462). Strangely, it shows that I have had no Unauthorised Overdraft Fees or Unpaid Standing Order Charges and only 3 Unpaid Direct Debit Charges... in two years! Something funny is going on....AND I never got my £10 refunded either!! The 40 days expire on the 14th May - should I send a 'polite' reminder of this along with my concerns that the list does not seem entirely accurate or should I sit and wait to see what the postman brings me next? :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have just rung customer services at the ICO as I feel increasingly uneasy about this spreadsheet thingy. I explained that as Abbey hadn't sent me any copy statements, I had nothing to check their charges against, and that they only totalled the charges for each month and didn't provide exact dates. I'm sorry to say they weren't very helpful :mad: and as I understood the conversation, it would seem that they do not regulate the format in which the banks provide the information :o . She did say however, that they have had many complaints about this, and equally from people who have received 6 years statements but not a concise list of charges as requested. Her suggestion? Write again, enclosing yet another £10, specifically requesting copies of all statements AND exact dates of charges for the last 6 years(which is pretty much what I thought I'd originally done :confused: ) Oh well, here we go again...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ever think they are washing their hands of it? if that can't point us in the right direction, who can? I thought the SAR letter everyone has been using states that we require a fully comprehensive list.:confused:

 

If they are inundated with loads of complaints, shouldnt they be kicking Shabbey up the derriere to stop this from happening, Shabbey are causing more work for everyone:mad:

 

I worked in a bank for work experience many moons ago, and I remember being taught how to use the microfiche and print items off, and it wasnt that hard and didnt take much time to do. what are Shabbey playing at? Maybe they are dragging their heels waiting to see what the outcome is on Monday with the Tom Brennan Case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

. . . .If they are inundated with loads of complaints, shouldnt they be kicking Shabbey up the derriere to stop this from happening, . . . . .

 

Of course they should - thats why they are there, or so we are led to believe!!!!!! However they seem totally afraid to do anything that might upset the banks!

 

Surely, under a formal S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), the bank are legally obliged to provide ALL the information they hold about you? This includes, as per the Information Commissioner's ruling, All statements, ALL interventions upon the a/c and whether they are manual or automated, ALL communications with the customer that are recorded on their filing systems, etc etc. If they are failing in this, they could, and should, be sued in Court for failing to meet their obligations under the Data Protection Act.

 

Or have I picked up the wrong end of the stick?

I do my best to be helpful, but at the end of the day I'm not a professional - please seek further advice if you're not sure. On the other hand, if I have helped, please click my scales - thanks ;)

 

Current Claims (all for friends!) -

 

Abbey - over £4k - Court claim issued & AQ filed ('Tish vs Abbey'). Alloc'n Hearing 21 Sept - Claim stayed 29/8/07.

Cap One - just under £2k - WON (just over 2k!)('Tish vs Cap One')

Cap One - just under £1000 - WON (just over £1k) Nov 07 (JimmyBoy vs Cap One)

Lloyds TSB - £3.5k - Court claim issued, defence rec'd and AQ filed; Alloc'n hearing 7th Sept Claim stayed 29/8/07! (JimmyBoy vs Lloyds')

MBNA - over £1k for mis-sold PPI - WON - approx £1500(IpswichWitch vs MBNA . . .)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dizzy Delilah, why not start your own thread so we can hop on board and help out.

 

That said, I am of the opinion (mine only) that if you sent a properly worded S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) request following the template letter from this site then you could argue that Abbey have not fulfilled their obligation as you should be entitled to ALL transactional information (that means payments etc as well as charges), copies of letters they sent you & any you wrote to them, any manual interventions on your account and if not they should say so and even transcripts or copies of recorded conversations with you, if any took place. You paid a fee for this info and they have not supllied it so I don't see why you should pay again. Plus Abbey are not obliged to fulfil a SAR if it is requested within 1 month of a previous request. (another delaying tactic do you think?)

 

I'd be tempted to write to Abbey telling them that they have not fulfilled your request as per your SAR and your entitlement under Data Protection Act, and that the clock is still ticking for them to comply.

 

HTH. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If only someone who works for Abbey could hop on and tell us what is going on!!!!

 

I am in two minds on whether to take on Abbey, I must admit the thought kinda scares me to death!!! Nevertheless, I shall continue reading the threads to get some inspiration!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take them on im going all the way with this,i too think they are up to something as well,there are three stages to paying out they will only pay the full amount you ask for at the final stage and that is the court stage,up until then they hope you will have bottled it,do not be scared when they offer you the goodwill gesture they have already admitted they are in the wrong then they will tell you that is it no more money to come,take it all the way shabbey are the slowest to pay up but what i've read from other forums they will pay up

Link to post
Share on other sites

If only someone who works for Abbey could hop on and tell us what is going on!!!!

 

I am in two minds on whether to take on Abbey, I must admit the thought kinda scares me to death!!! Nevertheless, I shall continue reading the threads to get some inspiration!!!

 

MBK, I agree with tigger1,

 

Take them on, it is scary but there are people on this website that will. and do help you every step of the way. Its about time the banks stopped ripping people off. We can all hold our hands up to taking a small part of blame for going overdrawn, but it is easily done, it doesnt mean though that the banks can exploit this and rip us off, sending people further into debt.

 

No-one expects their debit card to be accepted at a shop if there is not enough funds to pay it, the banks knew this and still let transactions go through, as they knew they could make a lot of money for each one they honoured. They did this to us 2 months running, each time they honoured 7 transactions. they should be made to pay people back for doing it.

 

Good luck everyone, and lets hope we get our money back quickly, and hope they stop their delay tactics.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I wonder if anyone can help. Basically I've been caught up with some family stuff over the last couple of months and have really only got back around to taking on Abbey. Basically the situation is that I sent my S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter on 13thMarch and have a summary of transactions from 2001 until Dec 2003 and then individual statements from Jan 2006 to present. For that missing chunk in the middle I just have that spreadsheet summary that loads of people get. Basically should I request the statements again or can I 'get by' with the spreadsheet? If I should re-request would the following letter be okay to send?

 

I thank you for your assistance in sending details of my banking records. However I am disappointed to note that the information about my account’s history appears to be incomplete. I, therefore, respectful request that you send me a statement of transactions relating to the account for the period January 2004 to January 2006. The table listing a summary of charges levied for this period, which was sent on 17th April 2007, is not sufficient for my purposes. Further I expect that you hold more information with regard to my banking records for this period than is given in that summary table and as such I do not feel you have satisfied the
Data Protection Act 1998 Subject Access Request that I originally made on 13th March 2007.

 

 

I enclose a postal order in the amount of £10 to cover the maximum statutory fee applicable for this type of request. I antispate a prompt response in this matter and expect to receive the information in the next 40 days.

 

 

If there is specific information that you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

 

 

Yours sincerely,

Thanks in advance for any help.

:) Captial One - Won!

:) Egg Card - Won!

:confused: Abbey National - Stayed pending Test Case Judgement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you not already sent then £10? if so, you dont need to send it again, just the non compliance leter and the stuff you are looking for :-)

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi! I sent them the tenner when I sent my SAR letter, but they refunded it. So wasn't sure what to do - I figured if they wrote back to request the fee then it would just waste more time. Also is there already a non-compliance letter template floating around or do you think my letter covers it?

 

Thanks!

:) Captial One - Won!

:) Egg Card - Won!

:confused: Abbey National - Stayed pending Test Case Judgement

Link to post
Share on other sites

:confused: Hi! I'm in need of some advice! Sorry if I'm repeating my older posting but I need some clarification. Basically having made my request for statements on 13th March - so far I've got the print out of all transctions from Nov 2000 to Dec 2003, individual statements from Jan 06 to present ad then that spreadsheet summarising charges levied month by month that covers the period Jan 04 to Jan 06. I really want the individual statements for this period. Is there a standard No complience letter I can use and if so who is the best person to dept to sent it to?

 

Thanks in advance

:) Captial One - Won!

:) Egg Card - Won!

:confused: Abbey National - Stayed pending Test Case Judgement

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks for the advice in the previous posting, but still no statements! Basically I still haven't had my statements for Jan 04 - Jan 06(I just got a spreadsheet summary of all my charges for that period), but I have a summary of charges for the period. I really just want to get on with making a claim 'cos it already substancial - circa 5k. My question is this - should I wait for the statements or just start proceedings based on what I've had from them all ready? Also the summary table just lists the month when the charge was made not the actual date - so from a point of view of working out the interest on the spreadsheet what do I do? Do I guess a date - looking at the rest of my statements the charges are normally applied around the 22nd of every month, do i give them the benefit of the doubt and use the last date of the month or, on the basis that I made my SARS request on 13th March and they haven't supplied me with the info I'm entitled to, shall I use the first date of each month. Any advice would be valued!

:) Captial One - Won!

:) Egg Card - Won!

:confused: Abbey National - Stayed pending Test Case Judgement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Alex,

 

On checking statements i had, all my charges came out on the 26th each month.So check statements you have and see if there's a set date that your charges come out.

I have used the 26th on my spread sheets since that seems to be the day they take them from my account.

 

chhers Barbs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there alex the lad'

few weeks ago i had the same problem. the way that i thought would be the best way around it was to use the last day of the month even though most of my charges came out on either the 13th,14th or 15th of each month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I did..... I sent off my first letter, stating in the first paragraph that I reserved the right to amend the final figure when the rest of my statements came through, which I also pointed out was now in default and I would be following it up.. I emailed [email protected] who was quite helpful, I also phoned Abbey up and chased up the statements, they came in time for the LBA, upon which I amended the amount.

NOT that it hurried things up at all, I am now ready to take this to court, and have not had any sort of offer! However I felt happier knowing I was underway

Good luck and keep in touch

I won against MBNA, Nat West , Barclays, Barclaycard and PPI payments from Barclaycard

Abbey National still to go.... what will I do with my spare time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice guys - I was starting to feel down about it all. Good luck to you guys with your claims - I'll keep a watch out for your threads to see how things are going. Best of wishes

:) Captial One - Won!

:) Egg Card - Won!

:confused: Abbey National - Stayed pending Test Case Judgement

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...