Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Dx100uk according to the ICO office, who I spoke to at some length earlier today after getting the email from the court, Equita are the data controller if they have instructed the contracted EA. The ICO have noted the case, and stated very clearly that the court has the higher standing in terms of dealing with, and punishing either party if they fail to adhere to the district judges order and any action they take will not be criminal.    but they also stated very clearly that with what I’ve told them, and on the basis of accepting what I’ve told them as gospel (which it is with written confirmation from both the courts and the police) then there is some major red flags being raised on both sides with them blaming each other.    they’ve advised me to essentially keep my powder dry until there is a charging decision and an outcome from the seperate proceedings with the EAC2 complaint, and then come back to them with the case and they will be in a stronger position to act against Equita and the EA as there will be established facts and evidence that have already been laid before a court.     
    • urm.. i seem to recall another assault case whereby the approved bailiff company claimed the body camera was nor theirs but a pers one of the bailiff, i think they got in serious trouble for it. i believe that breaks certain gov't approval for a bailiff company/firm regulations/laws  if memory serves me right?
    • have a look at  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/451423-pra-letter-of-claim-old-barclaycard-debt/?do=findComment&comment=5256506 the docs in this thread are what you should get. if the agreement the correct date for signup and does the PRA or BC cover letter use the word reconstructed? dx
    • sounds like lesley. They'll respond some rubbish I'm sure.  
    • Even if they have crawled back under the stone, remember they have six years to bring a claim. Let them know if you ever change address.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lolia V Lloyds TSB


lolia
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6210 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

Am farely new and have decided to start my own thread.

I have been browsing for a while and have read the FAQs and other threads.

 

I have already calculated my charges £2065 and sent off the first letter asking for my charges and the LBA was sent on the 2nd of april.

I just discovered today that I made a mistake in these letters. I used a spreadsheet and at somepoint in the middle my sort code and account number were incremented by 1(an excel feature) for about 11 rows thereby giving wrong sort code and account number. the charges column is ok. My question is can I send another LBA letter with the amendments plus I have since incured another £70 in costs or do I take the next step of making a court claim?

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi & Welcome!:)

Was your correct account number on the actual LBA letter? If so I wouldn't worry about it and carry on with your claim.

You can add any charges on up to the point of filing your Court claim.

Good luck, let us know how you go on.

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all just an update. i have been reading a lot while I wait for my 14 to start my claim. i have had nothing form Llods at all but on Saturday recieved a letter that seems unconnected.

 

Basically saying they owe an appology and a refund of £166.36 (£140 charges £26.36 interest) by 27th to put things right. I have read similar threads.

My question is:

my claim is for £2135. from the similar threads I will deduct £140 from my total claim icluding interest. My LBA was sent on the 2nd April. Do I need to send then another letter to let them know this or do I proceed to make my cl aim as it is lond overdue now?

 

Thanks in advance

Lolia

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello again

 

I was all set to start MCOl and decided to chek my account to make sure that the £166.36 has cleared before deducting. It cleared in the account today but the noticed that yestrday they refunded £750 to my account as a goodwill gesture. I havent recieved any letter regarding this.

I have read somewhere on other threads that i forgot to subcribe to and remember a mention of a letter accepting this as partial payment. can someone please direct me to the template letter.

Also do i need to wait a bit longer to start the MCOL to give then a chance to reconsider? If so how long?

 

many thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Rejection letters here:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/25716-rejection-settlement-offer.html

I would just carry on with your claim, deduct the £750 off though.

If you are doing MCOl, this link should help:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/71369-getting-mcol-right.html#post614610

 

Barty:)

 

 

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to confirm. I will remove the 750 + 140 from my total claim and then calculate the interest on that right?

You can do it like that but that's not what i actually meant.

 

Enter the £750 as a -(minus) figure at the bottom of your spraedsheet on the date it was credited. It will then create a small -(minus) interest figure too..

 

The whole point is to show in black and white that you have taken this into account. If you just deduct £750 off your charges and then file for the remainder,when it comes to settlement they will try to deduct the £750 again, which means more hassle.

 

This way you're still only filing for the remainder but they can see you've deducted the £750

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...