business claim 1992 and onwards

[sharpgun]

back now hedgy. opened post to find cobbetts defence again with a allocation questionare is this good news. it says if i submit by 1 /10 it will only cost £100?

[hedgey06]

Glad you made it back ok!

 

The fact that you've received an AQ is definitely a step in the right direction - means your claim hasn't been stayed to date. And the £100 is added to your court fees at a later date as well.

 

If you need any links for completing the AQ let me know (although if you click on the nat west sticky for nat west claimants, most of the info you need is there).

 

I've also sent you a PM about your PoC/cobbett's defence. Nothing to worry about for the mo!

 

x

[sharpgun]

hedgey im gonna need help from now on hopefully from you, the aq comes in a pink form. how do i fill it in? by hand or attachment?

[hedgey06]

I'm here all the way mate

 

Have they sent you the N149 or the N150?

[sharpgun]

n 150

enlighten me

[sharpgun]

which football team do you follow?

[sharpgun]

do u like footy?

[hedgey06]

Man City! Hubby's a die-hard blue till he dies (according to his mantra!) Unfortunately for him two of the lads are die-hard Man Utd fans............... gutted he is! How about you?

 

OK, if it's N150 - you need to complete a lot more info than you do with the N149. I'll include my sig on this post - so if you click on it you'll get the AQ links that you need (including the attachments) by clicking on the Nat West Claimants link. However, if you PM me with your email I can send you a couple of them completed (saves you time!)

 

You can download the N150 to your own PC from this thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/11644-allocation-questionnaires-guide-completion.html but, unfortunately, you can't save the changes (same as the N1). So it's best to get everything spot on in a word document and then copy and paste onto the N1.

 

The settled claims can be found in the litigation section - just follow the guidance for Nat West claimants in my sig for how to do this.

 

How's that for starters?

[sharpgun]

morning hedgey

have quickly looked through the link u gave me i think im gonna need to be walked through it, some of it is easy but other sections r confusing , you might think im stupid here but what do you mean by my sig?. i also need to know were to insert the pre six years paragraph. i have to do this this week as im off flying from next sunday for a while.also just looked on the nat west forum and my thread is not coming up on there which i think is quite good as they will be looking.

[sharpgun]

hello any one,

help needed just recieved an application notice to strike out. I havent sent my aq yet whats going on?

 

HELP:confused:

[sharpgun]

i have asked and asked,

im going elswhere

[caro]

What does your application to strike out say sharpgun? It should show some reason for the application, and it's impossible to advise you without more information.

[sharpgun]

caro,

have pmd u 3 messages did u reciave them?

[caro]

I didn't get the 3rd but have sent you my email addy. Give me a bit of time to go through and see if I can come up with anything.

[sharpgun]

hi caro

just sent-mail with third section

[sharpgun]

question,

have got aq to send back but then received an application notice what do i do?

[sharpgun]

got to go out now be back later

[caro]

Are both accounts for the business? I think you should still do the AQ as ordered by the court.

[caro]

I don't think you have too much to worry about sharpgun. It seems to me that they are applying for the strike out on the grounds of the case being over the 6 year limit, as they stated in their defence. It is up to the judge to decide on that issue, but it may be worth asking the court if they intend to hold a hearing to decide whether to allow the strike out, in which case you will have the opportunity to explain why it should be denied. As a business claim there should be no question of the case being stayed if the application to strike out is denied.

[photoman]

Caro

 

Wondering whether you may have an opinion on this, or if you could bring it to the attention of those who may?

 

It appears that the Banks are of their own accord requesting to have stays lifted on claims that involve Business account claims???

 

See our thread. Particularly towards the end of the thread (pages 37, 38 etc)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o....ml#post1139291

 

They themselves are requesting the stays to be lifted, stating that it is due to the fact that the OFT case does not encompass Business claims.

 

This is VERY peculiar behaviour?

 

Would appreciate any views?

 

Photoman

[caro]

The link isn't working Photoman, but I know that some have applied to have the stays removed, but as I see it, it's in cases where there should never have been a stay in the first case, ie business claims.

 

I've not been about much the last week or 2 though so maybe I've missed something.

[sharpgun]

hi caro

i need some help with the aq is that possible?

[caro]

Have a look at this thread, and if you have any problems post them here. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/11644-allocation-questionnaires-guide-completion.html

[sharpgun]

so the fact that they are trying to strike out on the basis its over 6 years, would that imply that should it not get struck out they are on a dodgy wicket?

[sharpgun]

how would you contact the court by or by letter?