Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi With the Section 21 Notice I do hope the Landlord issued you with: Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the Property How to Rent Guide A current Gas Safety Certificate (if gas in the Property) If above have not been provided to the Tenant by the Landlord then they can't use a Section 21 Notice until the above have been provided (note you don't warn the Landlord of this until but put it in your defence) Have a good read of this link: Evicting tenants in England: Section 21 and Section 8 notices - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Information for landlords in England on tenant eviction: assured shorthold tenancies, including eviction notices, Section 21, Section 8, accelerated possession, possession orders, bailiffs  
    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
    • Hello All,  I’m hoping someone can help me urgently here. Firstly, I’d like to say I have read multiple other threads and have some what an idea of what I should be doing, however my case might be slightly different so coming with my own questions here.    my situation is I lived in Dubai and had a credit card and a loan, loan with HSBC and credit card with Emirates (or the other way round), I lost my job and was forced to leave the country as I was staying in the country on my companies visa.    since coming back, after a few years 2 different debt collections agencies have been approaching me (one being IDRW and the other J&P). I’ve never answered IDRWW and they constantly chase me by calling and messaging me and my employer. My current company is ok with this as I explained the situation but I’m soon to be joining a new company who definitely won’t be ok with being messaged and called. I’m afraid to continue to ignore them as they may message and calm the new employer as they have before and I’ll lose my job. However, it seems clear from these forums that dealing with the debt collection agencies is never a good idea. You shouldn’t agree to the amount or pay anything.    j&p caught me on my phone but I still haven't sent them any money or confirmed the amount they’re saying is owed, they keep pushing to pay off the “principal” amount by making monthly payments, from reading these forums it seems like if I make one of those payments (they have provided bank details for ENBD), then it’ll just be paying off interest and not actually clearing the principle debt and the bank won’t even approve receipt of payment or that it’s coming off principle.    this is my predicament as ignoring them might not be an option if they chase my new employer. Maybe there’s a way to ensure the debt collection agency don’t contact my new employer?? I don’t know? Massively appreciate peoples help here. Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCA Agreements (Mark II) PLUS any other topic


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4944 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have drafted a letter, I know that I could use some legal jargon to throw some weight to the case...... Any input gratefully received...

 

Thanks xx

 

Dear

 

I refer to your letter, dated 22.5.07 where you informed me that you were unable to provide me with a copy of my Consumer Credit Agreement, which I requested under section 78 of the consumer credit act. I acknowledge that you have sent to me a copy of the terms and conditions of your credit card. This however does not fulfil your obligations as a lender. You point out in your letter that MBNA has responded in full to the request I made under section 78. I totally and utterly dispute that fact, you have not provided me with a copy of my CCA, and until you do the status of my account with you remains in dispute.

 

I would like to point out to you that I am in the process of reclaiming unlawful charges from MBNA, to date the amount I am pursuing is £xxxxxx, which is made up of £xxxxx in charges and £xxxxxx in interest, charged at the rate that you are charging me. I also require all defaults listed against me to be removed .

 

I am totally aware that MBNA not being able to provide me with a copy of my requested CCA is an offence in the eyes of the law, making the debt unenforceable. I am also aware of the steps I can now take in reporting this non compliance.

 

I ask that you now settle my claim without further delay to prevent this situation being taken any further. I look forward to hearing from you within 14 days of the above,

 

Regards,

 

just a few changes

 

Z

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 550
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

just a few changes

 

Z

 

In addition to Zubo's changes, I would also change "a copy of my CCA" to "a true copy of my executed agreement". This is only because CCA stands for Consumer Credit Act and as such you have put in a CCA request for your true executed agreement.

 

Other than that Standing, you're good to go!!!:)

 

Good luck, I have everything crossed for you and look forward to your next post!!

 

Regards,

 

 

Corn x:)

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My next post!!!! I have just come home after an evening on Bacardi, Lime and Soda...... Maybe tomorrow morning will be a better time... Just wanted to say thank you, I appreciate the amendments to the letter, but will re-read the posts added this evening tomorrow morning.... I want to get them back any way I can now..... fair means or foul, so they say xxx

I won against MBNA, Nat West , Barclays, Barclaycard and PPI payments from Barclaycard

Abbey National still to go.... what will I do with my spare time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Section 59 is by no measure going to replace the loss of the section 127 (3-5) safeguards but for certain types of regulated agreements it could be just what we are looking for and there is also the added bonus that if it does apply it would make the agreement void not unenforceable but as if it had never existed, food for thought.

 

Anyway here is a synopsis of the work I have done so far

 

Under the section 59(1) of the consumer Credit Act 1974, agreements to enter into prospective agreements to be regulated by the act are void.

 

This would be a pretty wide ranging and would effectively cripple any agreement that was signed by the debtor first and then sent off to be executed on the signature of the creditor.

 

In order to for this to work there has to be a list of exemptions which stipulate agreements that are not covered by the section.

 

These exemptions are listed in the,” Consumer credit (Agreement to enter Prospective agreements) (Exemptions) Regulations 1983/1552.

From our point of view the main points to note are these;

1 The section will not apply to any agreement that is signed on company premises.

2 The section will not apply to any document that has not had antecedent negotiations orally when in the presence of the debtor.

3 The section will not apply if the information presented in the Quotation regulations contain clearly and as a whole in the document. (This is the most interesting one)

 

In other words this only applies to a cancellable agreement.

I am informed by the OFT that this also includes cancellable agreements courtesy of the Distance selling regulations(Post 2004).

 

The potentially most useful part of the above is point 3.

 

The Consumer Credit Quotation regulations 1980/55 which must be included if section 59 is not to be applied consists of everything that you would expect to see on a regulated agreement together and as a whole and is contained in schedule 1 to the above regulations.

 

This means that if this information is not contained in the document when it is signed by the debtor the future agreement is void. This explains the comments in the letter from the OFT.

 

The quotation regulations have as you would imagine had quite a few amendments since 1983 most of which it seems to me are to keep them in line with the agreement regulations and the seem to integrate with the agreement regulations in 1983 in the consumer credit (Advertising and Quotations)(Amendments)Regulations 1983/110.

 

The SI for these amendments are;

SI 1999/2725

SI 2000/1797 and 2004/1484 which are entitled the Consumer Credit Advisements regulations.

I have not gone through all of these yet but I can see no problem thus far.

 

Best Regards

 

Peter

  • Haha 1

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have tweaked around with my letter, gaining some bits from other letters posted on our forums. Does this sound ok? I want to get it in the post tomorrow,

 

Dear Mr. Cross,

 

In reference to my request (dated 11th April, 2007) for a true executed agreement, under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77-79).

 

I thank you for your letter in response dated 22nd May 2007, but I feel I have to draw your attention to the points you made and now, how I view the situation.

 

Firstly, I quote “ We are unable to retrieve any copy applications made with Abbey prior to the conversion to MBNA that happened during 2001” my original request was for an agreement not an application form, the agreement I am to be supplied with, must be signed by myself and contain all the legal requirements for it to be executed correctly in accordance with the Consumer Credit Act 1974. The copy agreement I am to be supplied with, must be a true copy of the one signed by myself and Abbey National.

Secondly, and again I quote “For the avoidance of any doubt, we would like to confirm that MBNA has responded in full to the request you made under Section 78; and in any event, your credit agreement remains valid and your obligation to repay remains intact”. I totally and utterly dispute that fact, you have not provided me with a true copy of my CCA, and until you do the status of my account with you remains in dispute.

I am totally aware that MBNA not being able to provide me with a copy of my requested CCA is an offence in the eyes of the law, making the debt unenforceable. I am aware that not supplying me with a true copy of my CCA is a criminal offence; I initially sent to you a full request on the 11th April, 2007. I am also aware of the steps I can now take in reporting this non compliance.

I would like to point out to you that I am in the process of reclaiming unlawful charges from MBNA, to date the amount I am pursuing is £3504.02 which is made up of £2017.00 in charges and £1487.02 in interest, charged at the rate that you are charging me. I also require all defaults listed against me to be removed.

I look forward to be receiving your response.

Yours sincerely,

I won against MBNA, Nat West , Barclays, Barclaycard and PPI payments from Barclaycard

Abbey National still to go.... what will I do with my spare time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to jump in on this thread but just a quick question with the time frame of the CCA request.

Sent (RD) on the 18/04 allow 2 days posting and a further 12 days = 02/05

After 30 days = 01/06

 

The DD comes out on the 28 or 30 of each month, I've heard nothing... would it be risky cancelling the DD now? Otherwise they won't realise until a month after that?

Help me to help others!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I might change my brothers number to mine, as I would like to help him out with all this. When they call should I just say I have yet to receive my CCA and as such do not acknowledge this debt.

Oh also should I quickly phone them and get an up to date balance? and settlement figure so they don't add any interest or charges?

Help me to help others!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Me again.....

Have been reading through other threads this evening and came across something was relevant to me..

 

I requested CCA from templates on this site to Barclaycard (also MBNA, but that's another story)

The Barclaycard account is 5 years old, and the reason I was after a copy of my CCA is because I dispute the fact I asked for PPI... anyway.... I have read on someone elses thread that what they have sent me is not the true copy of the CCA that I asked for.. They have sent me a copy of of a priority application form "simply sign and return" It is not signed by Barclaycard, I do not appear to have dated it

Does this sound like they have conformed to my request or not? The small print is too small to read, but it is in one box about two inches deep and four inches across, maybe this description sounds familiar to anyone else who has received it.

 

Any advice appreciated

I won against MBNA, Nat West , Barclays, Barclaycard and PPI payments from Barclaycard

Abbey National still to go.... what will I do with my spare time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

have they complied ?

 

from what you have said........NO

 

prepare to start having fun with them...:)

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Me again.....

Have been reading through other threads this evening and came across something was relevant to me..

 

I requested CCA from templates on this site to Barclaycard (also MBNA, but that's another story)

The Barclaycard account is 5 years old, and the reason I was after a copy of my CCA is because I dispute the fact I asked for PPI... anyway.... I have read on someone elses thread that what they have sent me is not the true copy of the CCA that I asked for.. They have sent me a copy of of a priority application form "simply sign and return" It is not signed by Barclaycard, I do not appear to have dated it

Does this sound like they have conformed to my request or not? The small print is too small to read, but it is in one box about two inches deep and four inches across, maybe this description sounds familiar to anyone else who has received it.

 

Any advice appreciated

 

Hey there - i think it's safe to say that an application form can never be a properly exectued agreement. I found that out after i started receiving them in reply to my CCA's. I even rang the NationalDebtline and she was very quick to agree that an application form was not compliant to a CCA request! Had no feedback really requesting an agreement so have sent off Trading Standards reports this week.

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - just after some advice please regarding CCA request.

 

I'm helping my Dad at the moment and he requested a CCA from MBNA. They did send him a copy of a totally illegible agreement (you can't even read any of the small print nor the bit where is states 'regulated under the Consumer Credit Act..) but no terms and conditions. It does contain my dad and mums signatures and is dated.

So we wrote back and told them it was illegible and they had not fully complied.

They sent us back

- exactly the same illegible agreement with an undated handwritten note saying 'please find enclosed the copy of the application as requested'

- two other pages of someone else data :o

- three pages of t&cs which do seem to contain the prescribed terms (these can just about be read)

- no statement of account

 

My issues with them are

a) its illegible

b) they sent someone else data

c) how do I know if these t&cs relate to my Dads account?

 

My question really is what now? I know they have breached the Data Protection Act and was just wondering what anyone thinks are next move should be. :)

 

any help from the 'experts' would be very much appreciated, thanks

PLEASE sign this petition to reduce amount of time CRAs hold your data

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/CreditRA

 

I HATE MBNA :evil::-x:mad::-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Redsue

Not an expert, but here's a couple of things.

 

1) Who was the signatory of the info provided to you?

2) Immediately inform the ICO that info for another customer has been sent to you - they've broken DPA regs, and committed an offence under the second and sixth principles

3) I would reply, informing them that they have supplied someone elses info, that it's been reported to ICO, and state that as the info was relevant to the other customers agreement, they have still not complied with your request, they now have xx days to comply.

4)The prescribed terms must form the agreement document, not be added on using T&C's.

Look at the other persons agreement date, now look at the T&Cs with them, check that for a date.

Are the dates in the range for your Dads agreement?

 

This is ridiculous.

Got to complain to the ICO, to MBNA (William Wareing, Senior Legal Assistant) or (Mr S Bailey, Customer Advocate Office Manager)

and state the above, really lay it on thick, and demand the correct info.

Is the agreement supplied to your Dad headed 'Agreement under CCA 1974' or is it application form?

 

Perseus

If my advice has helped, please click on my scales. Thank you!

MBNA - CRA file to be cleared then finished!

__________________________________________

Abbey Personal - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court

__________________________________________

Capital One - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court

__________________________________________

GMAC - Sent DCA SAR 9th March 07 - confirmed not legally assigned.

Waiting for GMAC to provide breakdown of charges and CCA under s79

__________________________________________

Alliance & Leicester - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - just after some advice please regarding CCA request.

 

I'm helping my Dad at the moment and he requested a CCA from MBNA. They did send him a copy of a totally illegible agreement (you can't even read any of the small print nor the bit where is states 'regulated under the Consumer Credit Act..) but no terms and conditions. It does contain my dad and mums signatures and is dated.

So we wrote back and told them it was illegible and they had not fully complied.

They sent us back

- exactly the same illegible agreement with an undated handwritten note saying 'please find enclosed the copy of the application as requested'

- two other pages of someone else data :o

- three pages of t&cs which do seem to contain the prescribed terms (these can just about be read)

- no statement of account

 

My issues with them are

a) its illegible

b) they sent someone else data

c) how do I know if these t&cs relate to my Dads account?

 

My question really is what now? I know they have breached the Data Protection Act and was just wondering what anyone thinks are next move should be. :)

 

any help from the 'experts' would be very much appreciated, thanks

 

They did this to me Redsue, sent out an application form and when pressured, under separate cover they sent two different sets of T&C's from 2003 (the application was from 1996), therefore they could, in my opinion, belong to somebody else, they certainly were not from the 1996 application, that's for sure.

 

I would report to the usual relevant authorities and write to MBNA and point out that they have breached the DPA by passing you somebody's elses data and that it does not comply.

 

Idiots:rolleyes:

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Corn , how are you - Pers has told me a lot about you!

 

Hello Chargedup, all good I hope!!:rolleyes:

 

Nice to meet you, are you by any chance living under the same roof as Pers??!!

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am that person! (for my sins).

He spends so much time on here, I thought it was time I got involved - not that I'm checking up at all ;) .

 

I know, he's SO rude!!!! :D;)

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey steady! I resemble that remark...

 

My issues with them are

a) its illegible

b) they sent someone else data

c) how do I know if these t&cs relate to my Dads account?

a)adds to the un-enforceability of the agreement

b)breach of DPA and 6th principle and still makes agreement unenforceable

c)You dont, until they supply specifically your dads agreement and T&Cs relative to it, they are in default of your request.

Idiots indeed Corn!

If my advice has helped, please click on my scales. Thank you!

MBNA - CRA file to be cleared then finished!

__________________________________________

Abbey Personal - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court

__________________________________________

Capital One - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court

__________________________________________

GMAC - Sent DCA SAR 9th March 07 - confirmed not legally assigned.

Waiting for GMAC to provide breakdown of charges and CCA under s79

__________________________________________

Alliance & Leicester - Final LBA 28/5/7 - then Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks very much for your help guys - I'm drafting a strongly worded letter to MBNA at the moment on behalf of my dad - will keep you posted

Out of 3 CCA requests to MBNA for me, my hubby and my dad not one has been fulfilled correctly.

I had a fresh print outs of current t&cs after about 60 days, my hubby had a letter saying they would respond by 11th April (still waiting) and my dad gets an illegible agreement, someone elses agreement and who know whose t&cs.

Sack the Data Controller :rolleyes:

pi$$ up and brewery spring to mind

PLEASE sign this petition to reduce amount of time CRAs hold your data

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/CreditRA

 

I HATE MBNA :evil::-x:mad::-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello fountains of knowledge :D

 

Would someone be so kind as to pop over to my thread (http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/90156-alphageek-capital-one.html) and give an opinion on whether what CapOne sent me corresponds to a properly executed agreement or not?

 

The T&Cs they sent me for a start have £12 as the charge when they charged me £20 when my account was initially opened.

 

I have already sent my prelim, I just want to turn the screw a little by sending them a CCA Default letter if you all think it's appropriate to do so. :D

 

Thanks.

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...