Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That isn’t actually what the Theft Act 1968 S1 actually says, BTW. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1 (1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it;   The difference between what you’ve said and the Act? a) intent to permanently deprive rather than  just depriving (which is why the offence of “taking without consent” was brought in for motor vehicles, as otherwise "joyriders" could say "but I intended to give it back at the end") b) dishonesty : If I honestly believed A's pen belonged to B, and took it and gave it to B - B might be found guilty of theft but I shouldn't be. 
    • Received a call and follow on confirmation email from the police about my cabinets! They wanted to confirm that I was prepared to support police action for the matter and that I would be happy to provide a statement and attend court at a later date!!! I think that something might actually get done - it won't get my cabinets back I know that but hopefully it will put a stop to this so called courier doing this to people!
    • Around a month ago I had to send a sympathy card to a friend in GB. Logistically it made sense to buy a personalised one on eBay and get it sent straight to my mate, rather than faffing around getting it sent to me.  This mighty purchase set me back all of £3.05 (including postage costs). I was taken aback that, when it was sent, I got a tracking number.  For a flippin' three-quid card!  I had no idea that technology had moved on so much and that tracking was so easy.  The shop has feedback for 16,300 purchases so tracking must be easy & automatic. It's unlikely your case will get to court, but in cases that do this got me thinking that we need to aggressively challenge the PPCs where they have lied about the timescales of sending their rubbish and have no proof at all of posting - when it would be so easy to provide it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

bayman vs mortgages plc


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6237 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hello all, i have recently fallen on hard times and so have collected some 4 months of mortgage arrears. the mortgage company has taken me to the county court for a possesion order, what is this and does it mean i am going to lose my house?, i have now proposed weekly payments of |£500.00 which i have maintained for 2 weeks but the court date is monday and they say i have to bring the account within 2 months of arrears which i am unable to do: HHHHEEELLPP!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need professional help and not advise from this site really as it is far to important an issue

You could be in danger of losing your home !!!!:eek:

Ask a lawyer or your local citizens advise for help as they can often negotiate with your mortgage company for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bayman - this is serious and you should seek professional advice as soon as possible. However, I appreciate that it will not be possible before Monday.

 

First of all, try not to panic - it is unlikely that you will lose your home but there are certain things that you must do. The first of which is attend the hearing on Monday. This is very important. If you do not attend then the Judge will have no option but to grant the lender possession - you absolutely must attend!

 

There is the very slight possibility that the lender will not attend and will be relying on the fact that you will not - do not however, rely on this yourself - you need to attend.

 

You can rely on s.36(2)(b) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 which allows the court to suspend the possession order for such a term as the court considers reasonable. If the debtor can repay with in the reasonable time no possession order is granted. If you can maintain the payments at the current level then you should do so.

 

Under s.8 AJA 1973 in exercising the powers under s.36(2)(b) the court only has to consider the sums payable in arrears and not any term which may render the full amount repayable.

 

What amounts to a reasonable period will depend on the circumstances of the case and can include the whole remaining term of the mortgage as occurred in Cheltenham & Gloucester v Norgan. This case also stated the factors the court will take into account when deciding what is reasonable, these are, ability to make payments now and in the future, likely duration of financial difficulty, reason for arrears and the period of agreement remaining.

 

Essentially, if you can show you can pay off the arrears over the remaining period the court will not order possession.

 

If you have not already done so then you should complete and take three copies of this form with you.

 

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/HMCSCourtFinder/GetForm.do?court_forms_id=363

 

Make sure you complete it fully and give the lenders representative and the Judge a copy.

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies, we have filled out the defense forms, i will lose money if i take the day off to attend, which i can ill afford to do, i am stuck between the rock and a hard place, i know it is important i attend but it would be difficult, i dont know what to do for the best. We have made the proposal of payment which would bring the account back inline within 6 months, i was suffering from clinical depression which is why i wasn't working and the account got in arrears, would a judge still give the case to the lender with this in mind?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless you are there, or someone is to represent you, how can the Judge do anything else? The lender's solicitor will not speak for you, their job is going to be to recover their client's security.

 

You really should consider what is important and a few hours off work in order to present your case to the Judge should be more important than the possibility that this case could go against you.

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats one of the problems, its not a few hours off work, i would lose the rest of the week or at least 3 days, could the court still go against me even though i am making what i consider to be a reasonable offer of payment

Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously I do not know your personal circumstances but the hearing will not last longer than half an hour in most cases and as I have stated, unless you can appoint somebody to represent you or attend yourself, the Court will have little option but to act in your absence - stating what they will do is pure conjecture, but a fair bet would be that they will comply with any reasonable wishes of the lender as you will not be there to object.

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bayman

 

I have been through this with this company. I had a court hearing in January when I relied on the support of Citizen's Advice. They used a local solicitor & I got a delayed possession order. They then applied for & got an eviction order, due 11.00.tomorrow! These guys have NO heart at all. They go for the jugular! I found help at an unexpected quarter & went to court on Friday. They sent their solicitor from Eversheds, who argued well, but the judge was on my side & I got a 6 week delay. PM me for more info BUT YOU MUST ATTEND!!

 

Mad

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the advice chaps, i went to court this morning and got a delayed order, i have 6 months to pay the arrears. The lady who was representing the mortgage company turned up late and the information/figures she ahd were inaccurate which the judge didn't look to kindly on and adjorned the hearing for 15 mins and told her to get her facts straight!!!. I can say that it wasnt as scary as i thought it would be and the judge was genuinely intent on listening to my situation, Thanks again guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...