Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Re: Cca Request To Connaught Collections


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6052 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Latest Is I Have Sent A Letter To Their Founder And Director Mike Cleary , Who Apparantly Read The Last One That Was Sent To Him By Someone Else On Here And Actually Sorted It Out , Sent A Proper Letter Not Template Back , So I Have Sent Him Copies Of Everything I Have Sent And Received So Far And Also The Information That They Are Acting Unlawfully By Persuing Me After The 12 + 30 Days Are Up Until They Produce The Agreement , They Acknowledged That They Had Received And Read The Cca Request By Sending Me Back A Letter Dated 13 Th April 2007 So 12 Working Days Put It To 30th April 2007 ,1 Calender Month From Then 30th May , So Time Up Yesterday When I Sent The Correspondence To Him , Will Keep You Updated As To Response , Fingers Crossed That He Can At Least Be Nice And Reasonable Unlike The Intimidating And Bullying Staff At Connaught And 1st Credit !!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all , in an update sent a CCA non-compliance letter to 1st credit and this is the response I received , Dear Miss lisam , re: Complaint

 

Thank You for your letter of the 7th June 2007.

Our records show that you requested a copy of the agreement via Connaught Collections Ltd and a request was made to our client . We still await the same but have contacted our client again in this regard.

A letter of assignment of the debt was sent to you by post when we initially purchased the debt but should you require another copy please let me know . For your information as per the Law Of Property Act 1925 we are not obliged to send a copy of The Deed of Assignment itself.

We would decline your offer to refund you the payments made so far as payment is still due albeit at this stage unenforceable in a court of law. We are also not prepared to remove any entries on your credit file or offer compensation for the processing of the data . This information was provided by our client .In the event you remain dissatisfied with our response , you may refer the matter to the Financial Ombudsman Service within six months of the datof this letter . a copy of their leaflet is enclosed .

 

So what do i do now , i want to get this default removed so can anyone help with the next stage , their 12 +2 +30 days for CCA agreement to be sent was up on the 1st June 2007 , please help ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Complain to the F.O.S. and information commissioner.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and the OFT ......

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes victory I think , got a letter this morning as follows ,

Dear Miss Lisam696969 ,

Re : Complaint

1st Credit ref:******

Account The Associates a/c no *******

 

Thank you for your faxed letter of the 13th June 2007 .

We have contacted our client again for a copy of the agreement but as they are unable to provide us with an immediate copy , we have marked our files accordingly and have requested that the credit reference agencys remove our entry .

We are aware that we are unable at this stage to enforce the debt in a court of law . However we still invite you to make an offer of repayment.

 

yours sincerely ,

 

complaints officer.

 

do i leave it there or ask for written confirmation that the matter is closed so they can't come after me at some later time any help be appreciated .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Woo hoo, that's good news! I presume this came from Connaught. I would ignore them now. Write to 1st Credit though and point out that they have advised Connaught the alleged agreement is unenforceable and so they also need to remove all reference to it with the CRA and confirm they will take no further collection action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes and don't forget they can't enforce it rhough common law either - so don't let them try that one on you

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Their usual tack when acknowledging no enforceable agreement is then to say that however they have had legal advice that they are still able to pursue you for the debt under Chitty's rule of common law. Unfortunately for them they need to sue their solicitors because there is a House of Lords ruling Wilson v Minister for Trade and Industry (para 30) that says they cna't and that is binding on all lower courts.

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just be aware that they may return the debt to Citicard if the sale agreement allows them to.

 

1st Credit only acknowledge that they cannot enforce the debt at this point. You could try writing to them to say you want an assurance that they will not reopen but if they don't or won't give it then I cannot see how you can force them to do so.

 

Does anyone else out there know any better?

 

After 6 years it will become statute barred anyway and in the meantime it is off your personal data with all CRAs. Make sure you check that though. Don't just accept it at face value.

 

If you want to make sure everything is tidy you could write and say you will not be making any future payments but you don't have to do that if you don't want to.

 

Anyway, well done again. Stick around and give some help to others if you can. If you feel able to make a token donation that would be very welcome as we don't get many.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats great thanks very much , will be sticking around as i am in the process of fighting it out with littlewoods to remove a default that they admit i don't or haven't ever owed any money on good eh !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

got a letter yesterday telling me they had enclosed a copy of my application form as requested , so i had a look and it is a copy of my application form clearly states at the top application form for associates visa , has my signature on it but box for bank signature is blank no signature and according to a legal eagle freind a few other things that make it not a cca or not enforceable but i know a few people on here have had application forms and that they are legit so any advice appreciated , have sent them a letter telling them that this is not what i asked for under cca request and that it is not a properly executed copy of my agreement any further help be appreciated , thanks the fight go's on , lisa

Link to post
Share on other sites

help 1st credit have sent me an agreement or so they say it is a credit application form and has no signature from them in the sigend on behalf of bank so i have sent a letter back saying not what i asked for try again kind of thing can anyone halp please !!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi lisa i cannot help you on that one but my case is very similar to your own , there idea of a CCA was my application for my abbey account which came from 1st Cheddar (credit) and this morning i have received a connought letter about an SD, i called them and told them to stuff it (ok so not in those words) telling therm that my debt is statute barred and that as !st credit could not/would not produce a CCA that it was unenforcable, connought are going back to 1st credit for information

i will watch your thread with greaat interest as it seems a visa versa of my own

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I Faxed Them Letter This Morning Telling Them That Even If The Application Form Is A Creidt Agreement As They Say It Is , There Are Still Several Parts Of The Form That Do Not Stand Up To Scrutiny , I Have However Offered Them 33% Of The Alleged Debt As A Gesture Of Goodwill If They Agree To Remove Their Entry On Credit Files Immediately , So I'll See What Occurs The Letter Was Sent Without Prejudice Plasterd All Over It And I Admit No Liability And This Letter Cannot Be Copied Or Used In Any Action Etc Etc , And Also That I Will Vigorously Defend Any Action They Take , Which I Will , But Got Settlement From Lloydstsb For Bank Charges This Morning And If I Can Get This Default Of My Record Sooner Rather Than Later Then It'll Mean A Clean Slate ! Even Though It'll Mean Lloyds Paying Tham Of And The Fact That Over 50% Of Thedebt Is Charges Which I Am Trying To Reclai Mat The Minute From Citi , Does This Have Any Impact By The Way ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't offering them 33% acknowlege the debt? If all they supplied was an application form, why did you not just stick to your guns?

 

Sorry to ask but I am still new here and learning.

 

Good Luck, Kind Regards BigAndy

The Grand essentials of happiness are: something to do, something to love, and something to hope for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't offering them 33% acknowlege the debt? If all they supplied was an application form, why did you not just stick to your guns?

 

Sorry to ask but I am still new here and learning.

 

Good Luck, Kind Regards BigAndy

 

 

Without prejudice on the top of the letter means it can't be produced in court so therefore it doesn't count as acknowledgement. However it really doesn't matter because if the debt is unenforceable then the CCC can't pursue the debt through ordinary contract law because of the House of Lords ruling in Wilson v Minister for Trade & Industry. No enforceable CCA = no debt.

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi they have written back saying that it is and can i tell them why it is not a valid agreement , so i wrote back nad told them it was up to them to prove it was a valid agreement not me to tell them why it wasn't , also sent an S.A.R , does this sound okay any help really would be appreciated any better letters etc to write , oh and they refused offer of 33% !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...