Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

why cant you claim interest straight away


anthony3393
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6228 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

many people have been fined lets say 20 pounds around four years ago i dont know in real terms what 20 pounds in todays money is worth nor do i know how to calculate it, but im sure £20 pounds in todays money is worth less than £20 four years ago. so i am at a loss to understand why everyone cannot claim this unless it goes to the small claims court

 

if this has already been answered i am sorry but i have searched until my head has become foggy for the answer to my query

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Anthony,

 

Welcome to the forum.

 

Please take time to read the faq's

Please find your banks forum and start a thread;;

(your user name) V (banks name)

use the template letters.

 

LINKS....

FAQs....

Templates Library....

There is also live chat, visit if you need any quick advice.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/chat/flashchat.php

Finally good Luck.

Happyolddog.

 

If my advice helps please tip the scales, left.

Link to post
Share on other sites

many people have been fined lets say 20 pounds around four years ago i dont know in real terms what 20 pounds in todays money is worth nor do i know how to calculate it, but im sure £20 pounds in todays money is worth less than £20 four years ago. so i am at a loss to understand why everyone cannot claim this unless it goes to the small claims court

 

if this has already been answered i am sorry but i have searched until my head has become foggy for the answer to my query

 

You can claim interest straight away if you claim for contractual interest. This is more complicated to reclaim and you would need to understand the process before trying this.

 

If you chose not to try for contractual interest, should they not repay all your charges before you file the claim with the court the court the court awards you 8% .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anthony

 

You must study the FAQs carefully as everything is explained there.

 

This section deals specifically with interest

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/25457-guide-reclaiming-bank-charges.html?garpg=4

 

Basically, if you put all the details into the advanced spreadsheet then all the interest (overdarft and the 8%) is automatically calculated for you.

 

With the letters you request the overdraft interest as well as the unlawful charges. The 8% interest doesn't get added on in the initial request letters as they may offer to settle before court stage. However, if you file at court then the court will allow you to add the 8%, calculated by the spreadsheet on a daily basis since they took each item of your money.

 

Varangian Guard

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok i know it says do not ask for interest on your bank charges until and if it goes to court and i accept what CAG say if you do include interest in your prelim and LBA letter it will be obvious to the banks that i dont know what im doing, but i just wish to know the reason why you cant claim interest early on, because i think its only fair that i should be able to get interest even if it is settled before court action is taken so that depreciation is taken into account

 

let me put it like this imagine you fine 1million people in the country 30 pounds each then 3 years later you have to pay them all back £30 pounds each or they will take you to court so after havin all that money in my account for 3 years earning interest so it doesnt depreciate, i pay everyone back £30 and after every one is paid i have a surplus and the reason i have a surplus is cos even though you pay every one back the same denomination you fined them techniacally the 30 pounds you refund everyone with is worth less than the £30 fine they paid is that fair !!!

 

please do not reply with an answer along these lines you cant claim interest until it goes to court and then you claim 8% as my question is why cant you include the interest right off the bat and is it only me who understands my reasoning

sorry for the slightly sarcy tone but i have already posted on this issue before and know one seems to have really listened to my point

Link to post
Share on other sites

Threads merged.

 

The point about 'standard' interest is that it is actually Statutory Interest and is awarded by the court, at their discretion.

 

GaryH has explained that you can claim for interest straight away, but this is if you claim for contractual interest. It can be far more complicated and indeed can even be a 'risky' claim to make, but you are only asking about "why not straight away", so I won't go into that here.

 

Another site does suggest claiming straight away. We believe this is misguided because it may form the opinion of some users that they are in fact entitled to it, and so then refuse offers that do not include interest. This would be a very worrying set of circumstances and places the user at risk when it does reach court.

 

I hope that this shows you why.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats great now i know why its best not to go for interest unless it reaches court and i think CAG has made the right choice in directing us that way. but i do think it should be put in in the FAQ as many people must not, like me understand why they are told not to claim for interest in the beginning. thanks very much for your reply and il get my prelim letter sent out tommorrow cheers anthony

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...